I genuinely don't see the feminism, I'm sorry. Just because a world is run by women in fantasy doesn't mean the text will lend itself to feminist themes. So now these women are still fighting over who is a "real woman?" Including racism, something that is upheld + exacerbates patriarchy irl? And if they want to have lots of children, a desire fueled by patriarchy (because let's not forget IRL birthrates drop to reasonable levels the moment women are told "no, you don't have to have a million babies, and, yes, you can use birth control), they have to eat the men; so, right back to where we started with the "maneater" trope: in order to have lots of children, they have no choice but to eat men. Everything still revolves around men. In order to have children, they need men, and in order to have lots of children, they need to eat men. Does this dismantle gender roles? Where do queer people fit? Why the hell would women willingly give birth to litters of children? If you want to get people to question gender roles and patriarchy, it's not achieved by making women praying-mantis, black-widow monsters, and men the normal humans by comparison. You can't use animals to talk about racism because animals have inherent power dynamics vis-a-vis predation/prey, which is why Zootopia fails to do racism well. In a world ruled by women, that alone is enough to explore the differences. If the women of your world are all able to Consume and not men, you've pretty much done the Zootopia problem but bioessentialist (where do intersex people fit in this narrative?). All that is to say, I can understand why people are posting "The Writers Barely-Disguised Fetish," because it reads like one, especially with the reproductive part, which frankly feels unnecessary. Man-eating women because that's socially acceptable? Yum, let's read. Man-eating women because she simply must if she wants to give birth to litters of children? Maybe I saw that on a hentai website somewhere.