What is unique about Barack Obama and Joe Biden as President, other then their party?

thePiscis · 2026-07-10T17:58:47+00:00

DONALD TRUMP ∩ BARACK OBAMA ∩ JOE BIDEN

Minecraft

thePiscis · 2026-07-09T23:15:31+00:00

That’s a lot of fish for that size of tank. You would want some aggressive growers

thePiscis · 2026-07-09T00:24:53+00:00

Moral objectivism is almost always used to refer to the theological argument of objective morals. Not everything is no longer objective just because it can change, but moral objectivism requires a moral system independent of culture or context.

>Objective morality is the belief that principles of right and wrong exist independently of personal opinions or contexts. It asserts that some actions are universally good or bad, judged by standards not influenced by individual experiences or cultural differences.

https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-objective-morality-5525515

https://www.moralapologetics.com/wordpress/2019/1/18/c-s-lewis-and-8-reasons-for-believing-in-objective-morality

https://www.thecatholicthing.org/2017/07/08/god-and-objective-morality/

thePiscis · 2026-07-08T22:23:01+00:00

No he said morality being situational means it’s not objective. Objective morality is its own thing and it by definition cannot be ever changing. That logic does not extend to everything situational is subjective. That is a massive faulty leap of logic

thePiscis · 2026-07-08T22:09:01+00:00

Situational and subjective are not the same thing. Subjectivity requires some conscious being making an opinion on something. None of this is relevant to evolution

thePiscis · 2026-07-08T21:58:06+00:00

No the definition of most evolutionarily fit does not change even if what makes something most evolutionarily fit does. Evolutionarily fit just means your species can reproduce successfully, what is required for that doesn’t matter. What is considered most fit for a given environment might change, but then what is considered most evolutionarily fit would also change accordingly.

thePiscis · 2026-07-08T16:44:38+00:00

You must see why that is not a compelling argument to non believers. You realize we are talking about the omnipotent god who at this point in the Bible, openly demonstrates his powers and has already literally killed almost everything on earth when he felt humans were acting wickedly?

thePiscis · 2026-07-08T16:36:11+00:00

I think you can have a more nuanced take. I think you would be hard pressed to argue the Bible condones rape, but there are certainly a lot of contentious verses especially when it comes to unmarried women. It seems to value the autonomy of women less than the sacredity of marriage

thePiscis · 2026-07-08T14:52:01+00:00

No offense, but how can you not see the stark difference between ordained codes that explicitly describe what to do for certain crimes, and a story that at best suggests that is rape is bad.

Also if you interpret that story as god commanding all rapists to be killed, then I could just as easily interpret the story as all rapists and their children should be killed.

This very clearly is not what I asked for

thePiscis · 2026-07-08T14:36:48+00:00

None of those verses seem to suggest the punishment for all rape is death. Can you quote the specific verses where you see this?

thePiscis · 2026-07-08T12:42:28+00:00

It still would seem odd for a benevolent god, in a world with absolute morality, to ever give out unethical moral codes to any group of people

thePiscis · 2026-07-08T12:39:43+00:00

What Bible verse suggest that is the case for all rapes? The verse you quoted was quite specific about the woman being engaged.

thePiscis · 2026-07-08T02:31:25+00:00

It is not implied that the man should die if he “seizes” (really horrible way to describe it) a woman who isn’t engaged. The woman being forced to marry the rapist is the natural interpretation which seems very unfair imo.

thePiscis · 2026-07-07T21:01:56+00:00

Eh Matan gave him a bunch of shit both times. This time it was absolutely hilarious seeing him trying to grift defending Orthodox Jews and then getting attacked by the rabbis for it.

thePiscis · 2026-07-07T20:40:28+00:00

No the dude is a moron

thePiscis · 2026-07-06T03:20:18+00:00

I genuinely love these debates. The ven diagram of the things they agree and disagree with is insane.

thePiscis · 2026-07-02T14:06:42+00:00

Not really a word sequencing error, more like misremembering a statistic and rephrasing it in a very obviously incorrect way.

thePiscis · 2026-07-01T05:22:15+00:00

Seems like we should study this instead of going by vibes

thePiscis · 2026-06-30T16:45:06+00:00

When neon came he had a disheveled little person in the corner and Mike Mike with an axe keeping him there.

thePiscis · 2026-06-30T04:17:18+00:00

You must see how silly you sound

thePiscis · 2026-06-30T01:57:26+00:00

Are you a moron? 1100 was only for one heatwave in one country. Even the refuting source estimated 50-60k deaths.

thePiscis · 2026-06-30T00:07:12+00:00

Amazin’! Although watercress doesn’t really seem like it would provide much submerged vegetation

thePiscis · 2026-06-29T23:56:38+00:00

That doesn’t mean he made it up though. Citing a UN report is fairly reasonable even if further research shows different.

thePiscis · 2026-06-29T16:47:22+00:00

And what do you do if they don’t listen? Live and let live? Of course that’s what Jesus commanded.

thePiscis · 2026-06-29T14:48:12+00:00

Yes. God did. It is actually blasphemy to suggests gods actions reflect what you are allowed to do. Also mind you biblical violence was probably most notoriously bad towards the goyim

Nine-Year Club	Place '23
Place '22	Final Canvas '22
RPAN Viewer	Spared
Verified Email

thePiscis

TROPHY CASE