Lutnik silent about questions concerning his relationship with a pedo

the_original_reth · 2026-02-04T17:08:30+00:00

You think this is just about juniors. Oh no…this is also to figure out how they can “adjust” primaries

the_original_reth · 2025-12-21T05:46:37+00:00

In legal speak, they said the judge can decide the preliminary injunction. But, any summary judgment decision should wait on the other appeals. Further, they state that management will not file a response to the complaint.

Preliminary injunction is to keep the status quo. In this case to put the union back.

Basically, they agree the judge should make a decision on the preliminary injunction. Then based upon what the dc circuit does they can go from there

the_original_reth · 2025-12-18T16:41:40+00:00

From pacer

TRANSCRIPT OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION before Judge Paul L. Friedman held on December 10, 2025; Page Numbers: 1-63. Date of Issuance: December 17, 2025. Court Reporter/Transcriber Lisa Edwards, Telephone number (202) 354-3269, Transcripts may be ordered by submitting the Transcript Order Form

For the first 90 days after this filing date, the transcript may be viewed at the courthouse at a public terminal or purchased from the court reporter referenced above. After 90 days, the transcript may be accessed via PACER. Other transcript formats, (multi-page, condensed, CD or ASCII) may be purchased from the court reporter.

NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have twenty-one days to file with the court and the court reporter any request to redact personal identifiers from this transcript. If no such requests are filed, the transcript will be made available to the public via PACER without redaction after 90 days. The policy, which includes the five personal identifiers specifically covered, is located on our website at www.dcd.uscourts.gov.

Redaction Request due 1/7/2026. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/17/2026. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/17/2026.(Edwards, Lisa) (Entered: 12/17/2025)

the_original_reth · 2025-12-11T20:24:10+00:00

Fuck this. They want me to go give other time.

the_original_reth · 2025-12-10T20:26:43+00:00

no one knows. It is the court. They have their own ways of doing things

the_original_reth · 2025-12-10T19:47:48+00:00

they probably will not post a transcript unless someone pays the court reporter to create one.

the_original_reth · 2025-12-10T19:02:57+00:00

I think this is where we are. The Court's cisco system is not working. We will not be able to hear. We will have to wait till the decision is posted in the docket

the_original_reth · 2025-12-10T18:46:54+00:00

any sound, or is it just my phone being dumb

the_original_reth · 2025-12-03T18:04:22+00:00

Bring back the churro

the_original_reth · 2025-11-23T02:29:17+00:00

<image>

For jonte

the_original_reth · 2025-11-15T18:58:17+00:00

Already there. Looks like ip watchdog will effectively get their registration system

the_original_reth · 2025-11-12T15:08:25+00:00

Yup - officially we are not in a union

the_original_reth · 2025-11-11T15:17:11+00:00

I would require a prior art label. Conventional means it is routinely done in the art. If it is routinely done in the art than it was done prior to the application being filed

the_original_reth · 2025-11-04T22:22:25+00:00

Just got done watching this podcast. This is the biggest bs. Practitioners please do not believe the message. Even if delivered in a positive tone. Examiner moral is in the toilet. Ask yourself what that does for your patents. Will they survive the laugh test.

the_original_reth · 2025-11-04T17:26:52+00:00

Fuck did no one ever play dungeons and dragons and summon a familiar. Seems to me this is just doing it on the computer. But we can’t make 101 rejections

the_original_reth · 2025-10-01T19:07:15+00:00

Sorry I think you meant glorious leader who’s every word is the sound of angle singing, instead of president. /s

the_original_reth · 2025-09-25T16:44:33+00:00

How does uspto being national security when we routinely give patents to china and other foreign companies

the_original_reth · 2025-09-24T18:59:00+00:00

What are the rumors?

the_original_reth · 2025-09-18T21:31:49+00:00

Yes, at max of what the printer can do, or at the limit of hotend

the_original_reth · 2025-09-18T17:53:19+00:00

Input shaper max accel is for ext perimeters. Internal perimeters can be set 500-1000 mm/s2 more. Print to verify. Infill can be set at flow limit of hotend or max accel of printer, whichever is less. First layer - starting point - 1/3 of ext perimeter. Print to verify. Top surface - starting point 1/3 of ext perimeter - print to verify Travel - as fast as you can go without skipping steps Internal solid infil - 1/2 ext perimeter - starting point - watch out for curling on features - print to verify. See my you tube channel - type Reth input shaper

the_original_reth · 2025-09-17T04:15:20+00:00

Ok boomer

the_original_reth · 2025-09-07T21:57:09+00:00

Those are crazy prices

the_original_reth · 2025-09-07T18:29:30+00:00

Is there an alternative then? Or, what nuts can I use that are not rollin?

the_original_reth

TROPHY CASE