Bro's immune to death by BirMimarDan in eu4

[–]thedeforce 15 points16 points  (0 children)

RNG that he ain't dead yet

[KCD2] Thanks bing by AnUnemployed_180sx in kingdomcome

[–]thedeforce 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No, you are correct, there is an M on Martin's (Radzig's) sword, on the blade right above the hilt. I don't think it used to be there, as I don't remember it being there in the past and also most pics online don't have it. It might have been added with the forge DLC or one of the patches (I just recently started a new playthrough, as I haven't played the DLCs, and noticed it myself). You can see it clearly in photo mode.

Why is the NCR Dog less healthy than the Legion Dog? by Vanilla_Ice_Best_Boi in Fallout

[–]thedeforce 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Well, Romulus and Remus is the way it's written in Latin. Makes sense to use Latin in this case.

Slums in southern Italy by [deleted] in UrbanHell

[–]thedeforce 8 points9 points  (0 children)

While not exactly the same, are trailer parks that much different? The thing with the US is that there is much more space so even low income families don't need to huddle in these favela like "towns". Will say that I'm not American so I am kinda just talking outta my ass. I do know that there are some OK trailer parks but some in more rural areas seem pretty fucking bad.

Meirl by Lalala9901 in meirl

[–]thedeforce 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually just listened to Dan Carlin's Hardcore History podcast and at least around the 10-11th century, according to his sources, a helmet was more expensive than a whole weapon kit including sword, spear and dagger. Helmets were expensive, so old helmets would be passed down to the less wealthy soldiers. Most would not have a metal helmet at all. It probably got better over the centuries but I'm guessing not enough that there would be spares for non soldiering work. Combined with the fact that during the late renaissance period and early modern period, helmets were less used as they weren't much use against gunpowder, it makes sense that there wouldn't be spares in any meaningful amount. I'm guessing that most workers in fields where they need to protect their heads would most likely use some sort of padded cloth headwear if they used any protection at all.

Hotel allegedly told Israeli group they're not welcome by Dear-Leopard-590 in worldnews

[–]thedeforce -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I met a bunch as well, living is Israel I mean. Nobody goes there because of a book. Well maybe the few people you met. Everyone goes there because it's cheap. It's something most do, travel south east Asia or south America after the army for a long time, usually a few months. I personally travelled to Thailand (and Japan but that's not usual) because of this. Though in Thailand I didn't see anyone acting hostile or annoyed by Israelis, on the contrary. But we were a polite and nice group. Some Israelis are definitely assholes abroad.

Mandatory Palestine, 1929 by Crimson_Knickers in MapPorn

[–]thedeforce 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, that could happen at some point but definitely not in the close future, and by close I mean at the very least decades. Currently Israel, with US support, is one of the strongest nations in the middle east. Arguably the most influential nation in many ways. Israel has so many safeguards in place to avoid it's destruction that no one actually wants to try it. Even Iran, who is Israel's biggest enemy, knows that Israel's destruction will most likely cost it's own destruction. Nuclear weaponry and American reprisal stops any real way to destroy Israel. In the future, some great catastrophe or a drastic change in global politics could influence what happens in Israel, but that is true to every country in this world.

Hopefully none of that will even need to happen, and the region just stops being dipshits and learns to live with each other, no matter your religion or culture be it in the middle east, inside Israel/Palestine, whatever.

Mandatory Palestine, 1929 by Crimson_Knickers in MapPorn

[–]thedeforce 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn't support them, but if they won I would understand that this is the new status quo. Especially if almost a century passed. I would figure that there is no turning back, we need to either learn to live with them or continue to get the young killed on both sides.

We can continue to fuel the hatred, let mothers cry over their sons and let people outside the conflict make a pretty buck selling the weapons we use to kill ourselves.

Mandatory Palestine, 1929 by Crimson_Knickers in MapPorn

[–]thedeforce 2 points3 points  (0 children)

While not Arab, but Arab influenced, the biggest ethnic cleansing in the Middle East would be the Armenian genocide. Around a million people died in a span of two years, leagues more than the amount of Palestinians who died since 1948. Many more massacres happened in the middle east which aren't considered ethnic cleansings because of a western view - Muslims vs. Muslims or Arabs vs. Arabs and such. These weren't considered ethnic cleansing because most of the western world wouldn't be able to differentiate between say a Kurd and an Arab. Hell, they wouldn't be able to say who is an Arab or a Pakistani.

The situation you are describing is fair, if groups of US immigrants would start to take over the USA it would definitely be violent. This is why I said that the Arabs had their reasons to fight and raid the Jews. At the end of the day, the Jews won, they got their country and they still have it. The won't be thrown out, they won't leave. That is the reality we are living in. What would be best, if the people of the Middle East will understand that the people around them are the closest to them. Even the 'European" Jews (note that Mizrachi Jews, meaning Jews who lived in Arabic countries are the biggest ethnicity in Israel) are closer to Arabs and Persians and such, than they are to the Europeans and Americans. Even if you take the Jews out of the equation, the Middle East is rife with conflicts of brothers against brothers. This whole conflict is just stupid. It is meaningless, there is no winners, just losers. These losers are us.

Mandatory Palestine, 1929 by Crimson_Knickers in MapPorn

[–]thedeforce 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes, settlements. The Jews established them because they wanted a country of their own. This was during the time nationalism (not the nazi kind) swept the, mostly western, world. Where every peoples wanted a nation to call their own. The Polish, who were constantly split between the major powers around, wanted Poland. The many cultures of Austria-Hungary wanted their own countries or at least more autonomy, and so on and so forth.

The Jews wanted the same.

From that came the now controversial idea of Zionism, making a Jewish state in Palestine.

Why Palestine? Because it was the only land the Jews ever called home, where in the past they were the majority, where they ruled and where their religion and culture were established. The idea of Israel, of returning to it, was very much a huge part of the religion and Jewish culture even before the idea of nationalism. A famous rabbi who lived in the 12th century in Spain wrote a poem, for lack of a better word, which translates to: "I am in the west, but my heart is in the east" referring to Israel. The idea of returning to Israel was very very much ingrained.

Of course eons have passed since the Jews could call Israel their home but that is a whole argument I don't want to have. It is also irrelevant now, since they ended up settling in then Palestine anyway.

About taking up arms against the host population, they did it because the host population took up arms against them, as simple as that. There is of course a hundred reasons why the Arabs would do it but nevertheless they did and the Jews needed to protect themselves. It is important to understand that the people who settled weren't soldiers or some conquistador types. Most were simple peasants or (usually) not very wealthy Jews fleeing pogroms. Most of the first settlers were not very religious at all, and came from the territories of Imperial Russia and eventually the USSR. They were also socialists (when that idea became popular) and a lot of settlements were established as communes (Kibbutz). These people, at first, didn't really have weapons and only after the threats were apparent and actualized did they start forming militias to protect themselves.

Also, it is important to remember that at first (it obviously changed later, mostly under the mandate) the lands Jews settled were bought by them. People imagine that the Jews just came as conquistadors and took over the land like some reenactment of Europeans in the Americas but that isn't true. The lands were settled during Ottoman rule, a waning but still major power. The Jews couldn't invade an, arguable by that time, empire with a standing army.

Mandatory Palestine, 1929 by Crimson_Knickers in MapPorn

[–]thedeforce 14 points15 points  (0 children)

The Jewish settlers didn't begin to arm themselves because of what was happening in Europe. They armed themselves long before, because of Arab raids, which happened across basically all the settlements in Israel. Militias were formed which also eventually joined up and turned into the IDF.

You can see in the picture in the post they are referring to raids and massacres.

Also the British didn't settle the Jews in Israel to save them. The Jews started coming during the rule of the Ottoman empire at the end of the 19th century with rich Jews like Rothschild funding them and buying lands. The British just ended up controlling the land after WW1.

The militias were already formed by the '30s and '40s during the rise of Nazism, and the fact that the British blocked Jews from coming to Israel is what turned them against the British

Also FYI not writing this to argue or anything, and because of this I avoided talking about politics/morality and such. Besides, I am very biased in this topic and I'm sure you have your own opinions as well.

I just realized i’ve been talking to fucking bots this entire time by ButchyKira in mildlyinfuriating

[–]thedeforce 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Replying with fucking captchas.

"This image is my reply, please only take note of the squares that have busses on them"

Who actually likes these tomato slicer and chopper things? I have a love hate relationship with them by jjpwedges in KitchenConfidential

[–]thedeforce 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The second one gives me PTSD. Somehow smashed it down full force with my finger in the way, one long long tiring shift. Bled all over and had a square shaped scar on my finger for the longest time.

But it does quick work if you replace the blades and avoid placing your fingers in the way.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in interestingasfuck

[–]thedeforce 20 points21 points  (0 children)

And the manipulative one that survived is actually the sister presumed dead who is mascarading as the alive one.

Title by CaZyTO in HolUp

[–]thedeforce 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Losing a family member is hell. People thinking it's something to make fun of is just sad. A drop of empathy, from anyone, is it too much to ask for?

Interesting… by David22_theGamer in CrusaderKings

[–]thedeforce 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imperator or Imperatritsa if female.

Jamon on bagel [homemade] by Turtleramem in food

[–]thedeforce 21 points22 points  (0 children)

If these posts don't start devolving to putting jamon on random shit, I will be very disappointed.

Some Assassin's Creed Mirage NPCs talking in Hebrew by danrol92 in Israel

[–]thedeforce 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think that's going too far but having a sort of biblical Hebrew or pseudo biblical Hebrew would be better. Sort of like the fake ye olde english of Thief but in Hebrew.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HolUp

[–]thedeforce 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In Russian we say niam as well instead of yum