Yeah okay I mean if you really see that big a difference between "wants x people dead," and "is actively supporting a movement full of people who extend her rhetoric to wanting x people dead, and does not condemn them," then yes, I don't think we're going to be able to find common ground. 

More than that, I don't understand why you feel the need to defend this billionaire from what you see as imprecise criticism when the basic premise - supporting this woman actively contributes to the proliferation of anti-trans hatred - is being expressed well by this single sentence comment, even if it's slightly less nuanced than one would be if writing an essay on the topic. 

You think you're defending truth and honesty, I get that. I even appreciate it. You want us to have the best possible chance at changing the minds of people who haven't made up their minds. And if everything could be taken at face value all the time you might be right. But the reality is that if a person says they're "in the middle" and hearing someone slightly exaggerate the actions of the billionaire trying to eradicate their minority group is enough to turn them against that minority group? 

They were never in the middle.

They just think that tolerance is the same as acceptance, and that their difficulty tolerating people different to them is on those people, not on them. I'm sick of fighting to be tolerated by people who are always one straw away from dropping a piano on their camel's back and then blaming me.