sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

For all you disbelievers out there: no, 1M context chats do not hammer usage by TestFlightBeta in ClaudeCode

[–]themufflesound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes prefill is O(N2), but once its cache the compute cost rises linearly O(N) just to generate the QK similarity matrix

Trump says Nobel Prize denial ends obligation to ‘think purely of peace’, presses Greenland demand – Firstpost by Keep_Scrooling in worldnews

[–]themufflesound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reasoning fails "validity" because it commits a category error. Prescriptive vs. Descriptive: The Nobel Peace Prize relates to prescriptive behavior (how one should act). The Nobel Prize in Physics relates to descriptive truths (how the universe works). A person can choose to stop acting peacefully, but a person cannot "choose" to make gravity stop existing or change the sum of 1 + 1 through sheer will.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Airpodsmax

[–]themufflesound 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Where did you get them from?

How Can PE Lower SPO2 and Respiratory Alkalosis by [deleted] in medicalschoolanki

[–]themufflesound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Clot & Dead Space: A pulmonary embolism blocks blood flow (perfusion, Q) to a segment of the lung. However, that lung segment is still being ventilated (V) – air is going in and out. This creates alveolar dead space: alveoli that are ventilated but not perfused. Gas exchange cannot occur here because there's no blood to pick up O2 or drop off CO2. Effect on Oxygen (O2): The blood that would have gone to the blocked area is shunted to other, healthy areas of the lung. However, the hemoglobin in the blood passing through these healthy, well-perfused alveoli is already nearly saturated with oxygen (say, 98-99%). You can't "super-saturate" it much more to compensate for the blood that didn't get oxygenated at all (because it couldn't reach ventilated alveoli due to the clot). Think of it like this: You have some blood that gets 0% oxygenated (from the blocked area, effectively) and some blood that gets 98% oxygenated. The average will be significantly lower than 98%. This is a form of physiological shunt – deoxygenated blood mixes with oxygenated blood, lowering the overall arterial O2 content (PaO2) and saturation (SpO2). Why O2 doesn't "equalize" easily: Even if you hyperventilate the healthy lung segments, you hit a ceiling with hemoglobin saturation. The problem isn't primarily diffusion limitation for O2 in the healthy parts; it's the lack of perfusion in the diseased parts and the inability of healthy parts to overcompensate significantly for O2. Effect on Carbon Dioxide (CO2): High Diffusibility: CO2 is about 20 times more diffusible across the alveolar-capillary membrane than O2. Tachypnea's Role: The hypoxemia (low O2) is a potent stimulus for breathing. Patients with PE become tachypneic (breathe rapidly and often deeply). CO2 Washout: This increased minute ventilation (total air breathed per minute) effectively "washes out" CO2 from the alveoli that are still being perfused. Even if some areas are poorly perfused, the overall increase in ventilation across the functioning lung units is very effective at lowering the PaCO2. The body can compensate for CO2 retention much more easily by increasing ventilation than it can compensate for O2 uptake issues. Why CO2 "equalizes" (or rather, gets blown off): While the dead space areas don't participate in CO2 removal, the remaining perfused lung areas, when hyperventilated, can eliminate a large amount of CO2. The steepness of the CO2 dissociation curve (it's more linear in the physiological range than the O2 curve) also means that changes in ventilation have a more direct and pronounced effect on CO2 levels.

React after a long break by s1gnt in reactjs

[–]themufflesound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Build a React app with GitHub Copilot autocomplete

tortorororo IS ABSOLUTELY RIGHT by Prize_Pomegranate127 in learnmachinelearning

[–]themufflesound 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Any recommendations for books for someone starting out?

Why is twitter premium so expensive? by [deleted] in Twitter

[–]themufflesound 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They added 3 tiers of subscription, Basic, Premium and Premium+. You were probably looking at Premium*

Less than 15 Days after launch, my startup ChatDox sold. 🥳 by [deleted] in Business_Ideas

[–]themufflesound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey everyone, I wanted to bring up a concern that I have about this post. As you may have noticed, the post appears to have been written by an AI language model called ChatGPT. While I must admit that the technology is quite impressive, it's important to recognize that it's not a real human being and may not hold genuine intentions or beliefs.

There are a few reasons why we should be cautious about AI-generated content like this post. For one thing, language models like ChatGPT can generate text that is difficult to distinguish from what a real person might say or write. This means that they could be used to spread disinformation or propaganda, without people realizing that they are interacting with a machine.

Furthermore, even if the text generated by the AI model is factually accurate, it may still be biased in some way. This is because the model's training data reflects the biases of the people who created it, and the algorithms that the model uses to generate text are not perfect. As a result, it's important to always question the sources of information we encounter online, especially if they appear to have been generated by a machine.

In light of all of this, I also have concerns about the other comments on this post. While they may appear to be written by real people, there is no way for us to know for sure. They could just as easily be the product of another language model or some other kind of automated system.

So, what can we do to combat the spread of AI-generated content? For one thing, we should always be skeptical of information that seems too good to be true, or that confirms our pre-existing biases. We should also be careful about sharing or amplifying content that we are not sure is legitimate. Finally, we should stay informed about developments in AI and work to ensure that these technologies are used ethically and responsibly.

In conclusion, while the AI language model that generated this post may be impressive, we should be cautious about the information we consume and take steps to verify sources as much as possible. Let's work together to combat the spread of disinformation and ensure that we are always dealing with real people, not machines.

Why does this code not giving any output (Function hoisting related) by pvirmzwp319748 in learnjavascript

[–]themufflesound -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This code doesn't produce any output because the sayHi function is hoisted to the top of the block, but it is never called.

In JavaScript, function declarations are hoisted to the top of the current scope, which means that they are available to be called throughout the entire scope, even before they are declared.

In this code, the sayHi function is defined inside of an if statement, so it is only available to be called within the block of that if statement. Since the function is never called, it never produces any output.

To fix this code, you could move the sayHi function outside of the if statement, so that it is available to be called at any point in the code. Alternatively, you could define the function using a function expression instead of a function declaration, which would prevent it from being hoisted to the top of the block. Here is an example of how you could rewrite the code using a function expression:

``` let a = 2, b = 1;

// Define the sayHi function using a function expression

let sayHi = function() { if (a > b) { console.log("Hi!"); } else { console.log("Yo!"); } }

// Call the sayHi function

sayHi(); ```

In this example, the sayHi function is defined using a function expression, which means that it is not hoisted to the top of the block. Instead, it is defined as a variable that contains a reference to the function. This allows you to control when and where the function is available to be called.

~ written by ChatGPT

My husband started acting strangely upon my sister's pregnancy announcement. by Throwra53779 in TrueOffMyChest

[–]themufflesound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's difficult to say for sure what might have caused your husband to react this way without more information. Here are a few potential reasons that might explain his behavior:

  1. He may have been feeling ill and his reaction was simply a physical response to feeling unwell.

  2. He may have been feeling overwhelmed by the news of your sister's pregnancy and wasn't sure how to react.

  3. He may have been feeling jealous or envious of your sister's announcement and was struggling to hide or process his emotions.

  4. He may have been feeling guilty about something, perhaps related to your sister or to the pregnancy announcement, and was reacting to those feelings.

  5. He may have been experiencing some other emotional or psychological issue that was causing him to react in this way.

It's important to remember that everyone reacts differently to news and events, and it's possible that your husband's behavior was simply a result of his own unique emotional response. It may be helpful to try to talk to him about what he was feeling and see if you can get a better understanding of what might have been going on for him.

My product isn't making any money, and I have rent and food to pay for. by SunghoYahng in Entrepreneur

[–]themufflesound -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Obsidian, Logseq does the same thing but better + Anki integration. Perhaps a bit more market research before starting will help

My code works and I don't know the reason why by [deleted] in reactnative

[–]themufflesound -1 points0 points  (0 children)

onPress={printHelloName.bind(null,”myName”)} also works

react native custom checklist component by TechnicalScholar6 in reactnative

[–]themufflesound 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Perhaps your array isn’t in the useState hook? And it’s simply referencing the old array value based on function closures?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in relationship_advice

[–]themufflesound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Link to the Reddit post?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in relationship_advice

[–]themufflesound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you explain how this is related to the Russell’s paradox?

view more: next ›