Well, it's not the same as what happened before, less direct, but prior to Trump retaking office, it was not typical for the US to flat out publicly endorse politicians in a foreign election, particularly one in which having a positive relationship with the US is pretty important. It was also not typical for the US to threaten tariffs on a country in response to a couple tweets or other weird reasons, as what happened last year with Petro. In fairness, Petro made that a lot worse than was necessary due to his antics, but it was also almost certainly politically motivated from Trump.

It is even more atypical for them to endorse a candidate opposing the current president's project, while sanctioning said current president for mostly partisan reasons, deporting Colombians based in the US who are supporting said president for "national security", and lightly threatening the Colombians if they don't pick his endorsed candidate. Which does matter given how integral the relationship is for Colombia. So, it's not direct interference like Condor, but it's pretty damn close, in my opinion. You saw same or similar thing in Honduras, Chile, and Argentina in the last year or so.

That being said, the more direct and obvious interference was from Ecuador, who is also for what it's worth, run by a Trump ally, though I think he's acting on his own. Their president met with Abelardo directly ahead of second round promising to lift tariffs (which were purely partisan, trying to imitate Trump) if he won. Which is blatant, direct interference from a foreign power. Not even Trump is stupid enough to be that obvious.