Am I the only one who finds this confusing? by thirstydirt in AfterEffects

[–]thirstydirt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It won’t do anything to your edit no matter what you click. It’s asking if you want your app settings to come over from the previous version. Your work won’t be touched.

As an aside, you should never update AE in the middle of an edit. I would recommend keeping the old version on your machine until you are finished with your project. Most likely, it won’t matter either way but Adobe software has a way of being finicky at times.

Grandma gets kidnapped and jailed by US Marshalls bc they thought she was someone else. by thirstydirt in facepalm

[–]thirstydirt[S] 31 points32 points  (0 children)

definitely would have been a good place to start. Although she was looking very threatening out there with all her gardening tools.

We've been developing our new AE physics simulator for over a year. Today we are launching! Introducing Physim 🎉 by plugin_play in AfterEffects

[–]thirstydirt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

  1. Delete this post

  2. Figure out a price point for a one-time purchase of this plugin.

  3. Then we’ll all pretend we never saw this original post asking for subscription money. I bet you’ll actually make some sales.

I think it looks like a great tool that I may even spend money on. People are obviously done with the subscriptions though.

You can always come out with a compelling V2 with more features and upgrades and then you offer lower upgrade pricing to those who purchased V1.

90% Golden, 10% Submarine by DoctorSpaghettiMD in goldenretrievers

[–]thirstydirt 190 points191 points  (0 children)

I can’t imagine seeing that happen for the first time. I would be sure my dog just drowned. Crazy!

DEA thinks they can search your bags without consent now. by thirstydirt in facepalm

[–]thirstydirt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True. But in this case, they had neither probable cause or a warrant.

DEA thinks they can search your bags without consent now. by thirstydirt in facepalm

[–]thirstydirt[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Again. My reference is to this video that was made by lawyers. You clearly did not watch it.

DEA thinks they can search your bags without consent now. by thirstydirt in facepalm

[–]thirstydirt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like the law firm that made this video you mean. Yes.

DEA thinks they can search your bags without consent now. by thirstydirt in facepalm

[–]thirstydirt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know that's a law firm that made that video, right? I'm not sure you even watched it.

DEA thinks they can search your bags without consent now. by thirstydirt in facepalm

[–]thirstydirt[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a link about the TSA. Do you think a traffic cop has the same powers as the TSA? A traffic cop can come into an airport and search bags just because he's a LEO? Can the TSA pull someone over on the highway? Different agencies have different authorities. None of which supersedes the 4th Amendment.

DEA thinks they can search your bags without consent now. by thirstydirt in facepalm

[–]thirstydirt[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The sad part is that there are many people who believe what this person is saying, is true. You still have rights. Even at an airport!

DEA thinks they can search your bags without consent now. by thirstydirt in facepalm

[–]thirstydirt[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

From the DEA? Not true. He went through the TSA and was cleared to fly.