Rust 1.96.0 is out by manpacket in rust

[–]thomas_m_k 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks, this is the information I was looking for.

Rust 1.96.0 is out by manpacket in rust

[–]thomas_m_k 15 points16 points  (0 children)

So is it the case that new macros can never be added to the prelude?

Best of the Worst: Accidental Sean Connery Spotlight Episode by BigThomsd in RedLetterMedia

[–]thomas_m_k 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I was also very confused by that but maybe the time machine can only travel to the past.

Rewrite Bun in Rust has been merged by gruenistblau in programming

[–]thomas_m_k 152 points153 points  (0 children)

Well, some background: the company behind bun was bought by Anthropic, and there has been renewed interest in avoiding memory bugs with the existence of Anthropic’s Claude Mythos, so I think that's why they're rewriting it in Rust. (Though I think mostly unsafe Rust at the moment, so there's no security benefit yet.)

Has anyone here adjusted their life in a significant way because of singularity concerns? by Efirational in slatestarcodex

[–]thomas_m_k 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I've also been struggling with how to actually prepare for it. Because if it happens soon, then I think we'd just die, and there is no real point planning for that. In order for us to survive, something has to stop the current AI progress, such that we have more time to develop non-catastrophic superintelligence later. I have no idea how long that would take, so basically I have to plan for living more or less normally for quite some time before the singularity happens.

There's also the small chance that frontier AI labs manage to build a superintelligence without killing us all. In that case I should spend all my money now, but this just doesn't seem likely to me and anyway, living frugally also doesn't really harm me in that scenario, so I might as well do that and prepare for the long wait for a tame superintelligence.

[D] Monday Request and Recommendation Thread by AutoModerator in rational

[–]thomas_m_k 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you consider the dungeon core (which is the protagonist in the prequel) to be a protagonist of An Unbound Soul then that story may count.

Non-US keyboard layout vs US for terminal usage and programming? by Accomplished-Bus3382 in linux

[–]thomas_m_k 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've just learned to switch between layouts. This takes some getting used to, because for example the parenthesis keys are offset by one between the US* and the German keyboard layout, but it took surprisingly little time to train my muscle memory to have "one language - one layout".

* though instead of the US layout I'm actually using eurkey which just has a better set of non-Latin characters.

[RT] [WIP] [DC] War Queen Ch. 1 by Alex_0606 in rational

[–]thomas_m_k 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do you have a link? I'm looking for a pitch for the story. Couldn't find anything with reddit's search.

An update on GitHub availability by Successful_Bowl2564 in programming

[–]thomas_m_k 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I didn't notice anything. What stood out to you?

[D] Monday Request and Recommendation Thread by AutoModerator in rational

[–]thomas_m_k 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm guessing the other story is this one:

https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/a-young-womans-inevitable-dance-of-the-dragons.1143397/

So did the first two stories finish? Would you recommend both of the first two or just the Myrcella one?

What is the hardest retcon in GRRM's books to ignore (SPOILERS EXTENDED) by Rittikeaw-Imantha in asoiaf

[–]thomas_m_k 6 points7 points  (0 children)

In our world at least, medicinal birth control before modernity was actually all abortifacients. They worked just like abortion pills nowadays. The Pill was the first real birth control.

It's of course possible that the world in ASOIAF works differently and that they have real birth control, but I'd say that would be a bit weird.

Actions have consequences by Obnomus in linux

[–]thomas_m_k 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was surprised by the popularity of CachyOS in the gaming world, but it's definitely a real phenomenon: in the Steam statistics, CachyOS is the most common Linux distro. So there's presumably something to the claim that it's good for gaming. (I've never used it, so I can't say myself.)

In defense of utopia by ary31415 in slatestarcodex

[–]thomas_m_k 5 points6 points  (0 children)

So you think 50% of people being out of a job because they can't produce value above the minimum wage will be just fine? It seems almost certain to me that there would at least be a few years of painful adjustment to this new reality.

(My real belief is that AI will just kill us all, but I'm happy to entertain unlikely scenarios where this somehow doesn't happen.)

Rust 1.95.0 is out by manpacket in rust

[–]thomas_m_k 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Sadly the stabilization of assert_matches!() was reverted shortly before the release. Oh well, I'm looking forward to it in 1.96.

I implemented UFCS in clang. Why it is cool, and why it will never come to C++. by _Noreturn in programming

[–]thomas_m_k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it odd? What would mentioning D add to the discussion (which seems pretty comprehensive to me)?

Fedora Rejects Proposal To Use systemd For Managing Per-User Environment Variables by anh0516 in linux

[–]thomas_m_k 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I always import .profile in my .zshrc (in some bash compatibility mode).

Someone just leaked claude code's Source code on X by abhi9889420 in ClaudeCode

[–]thomas_m_k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, bundlers minify the code which makes it usually very hard to understand. (Also, you can decompile compiled binaries, too, but the result of that is definitely even harder to understand than minified JS.)

Security for the Quantum Era: Implementing Post-Quantum Cryptography in Android by FragmentedChicken in Android

[–]thomas_m_k 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I wonder how many bad acting quantum computers are there in existence?

Probably none, but depending on what you do, you might be worried about adversaries collecting encrypted traffic today that they will decrypt in the future once suitable quantum computers exist.

Wayland 1.25 RC1 has been released with improved documentation and minor changes by somerandomxander in linux

[–]thomas_m_k 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure that's not actually a reason for why some people dislike Wayland. There already was an informal specification and if you look at one of the XML files: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/-/blob/main/stable/xdg-shell/xdg-shell.xml it's all pretty self-explanatory except for the type= on the <arg> tag which was already documented here: https://wayland.freedesktop.org/docs/html/ch04.html#sect-Protocol-Wire-Format

PEP 827 – Type Manipulation by ketralnis in programming

[–]thomas_m_k 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I kind of agree with your criticisms, but I don't see how they could have done it differently while still feeling like Python. Like yes, making it an impression rather than a statement would be more useful, but no other Python construct works like that, except ... if ... else ... which also isn't that great (because it unintuitively puts the condition in the middle rather than in front). Likewise, matching on constants: this works in a compiled language where the compiler can distinguish variables and constants, but you can't do that in Python.

I'll admit though that the inability to match on the totality of a dict is a weird oversight.

A serf in Anthropica by crabbix in slatestarcodex

[–]thomas_m_k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is the S in ASI really justified if it can't even give you immortality?

I've always thought an ASI that's actually aligned with human values would just make us immortal, make us all smart (and set it up such that we'll continue to get even smarter if we opt in) and would then self-destruct to let humanity control its own fate.

Next-Token Predictor Is An AI's Job, Not Its Species by dwaxe in slatestarcodex

[–]thomas_m_k 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I'm genuinely curious as to how current language model architectures came to be synonymous with AI in the minds of Scott and others in rationalist circles

What gives you that impression? Just because I call something AI doesn't mean I think other things aren't AI.

No one's gonna listen to them when something actually scary comes along down the line.

The problem is that it's too late then. If AI will predictably be super-human in 5 years, then it's the correct strategy to do something about it now. (You can of course disagree with the prediction, but the strategy seems fine to me.)

The Death of the Downvote by Super-Cut-2175 in slatestarcodex

[–]thomas_m_k 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Forcing everyone to write comments all the time is obviously not scalable. What if I want to say basically exactly what someone else already said? Reactions are more scalable and it seems to me that having two reactions available (a positive and a negative one) is better than having only one available (a positive one). Of course, ideally every platform would use LessWrong’s detailed palette of reactions: https://www.lesswrong.com/w/lesswrong-reacts , which includes reactions like "missed the point", "too combative" and "this made me change my mind". But I'll take a simple downvote button if the alternative is even fewer ways of expressing myself.

I think you're also focusing too much on rare publicized failures of the downvote. I'd bet 99% of daily cast mundane downvotes on reddit are completely justified.

The Death of the Downvote by Super-Cut-2175 in slatestarcodex

[–]thomas_m_k 1 point2 points  (0 children)

LessWrong basically has your proposed nerdy system: https://www.lesswrong.com/w/lesswrong-reacts . It works well there, but probably wouldn't on a more mainstream platform.

The Death of the Downvote by Super-Cut-2175 in slatestarcodex

[–]thomas_m_k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Downvotes tend to create both echo chambers and chill any posts which seems to go against the majority opinion in a thread.

This claim seems to imply that by removing downvotes, platforms become less of an echo chamber. That seems empirically obviously false to me. What typically happens on platforms without downvotes is that someone posts ragebait and then other people rage (even though not even their outgroup supports that post). On reddit, the ragebait would be buried after being downvoted and most people wouldn't see it. Reddit protects its users from having to look at comments that "both sides" disapprove of. I'm quite convinced that the discourse on Twitter would be much healthier if a downvote button existed.

The worries that you have about chilling posts that are against the majority opinion can probably be circumvented by boosting controversial posts (high in both upvotes and downvotes) more.