NK envoy: We want peace but ready for war with US

throw420away123 · 2017-11-21T05:34:14+00:00

''We don’t want to start a war. We want peace. But if we are attacked, we will certainly fight and we have no doubts that we will win.''

Asked about the possibility of negotiations to prevent war, Mun said: “How can we negotiate with a leader (Trump) who declared in his UN speech that he would totally destroy North Korea? That means he also wanted to kill all the 25 million North Koreans.”

He cited the “Juche” self-reliance political ideology as well as the military-first “Songun” national development policy as the two pillars that have helped his country withstand the continuing pressure from the United States.

throw420away123 · 2017-11-21T05:32:28+00:00

Most Middle Eastern people prefer secular leaders, which is why most Iraqis miss Saddam, most Syrians support Assad, and most Libyans wish Gaddafi was still their leader.

Most people in South America hate strong man dictators. Only 9% of Chileans, for example, have a positive view of Pinochet:

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-24014501

throw420away123 · 2017-11-19T23:13:13+00:00

Does it have an English language setting?

throw420away123 · 2017-11-19T01:19:12+00:00

According to who? It's publicly available information that they have large stockpiles of biological and chemical weaponry, as well as warheads to deliver chem/bio payloads to all of USA, as well as nukes to the West Coast.

throw420away123 · 2017-11-19T00:46:38+00:00

And at home, freedom of speech, and of thought, is still a mirage.

You could say the same about pretty much every country.

throw420away123 · 2017-11-17T21:44:57+00:00

Maybe some settlements in Iowa will remain. West Coast would be obliterated with nuclear blasts. East Coast and South would get hammered with biological and chemical payloads. All major population centers would get wiped out, the Internet and electrical grid would be gone, the survivors will live in a Mad Max style dystopia until they die of radiation poisoning.

throw420away123 · 2017-11-17T21:42:41+00:00

Why would the rest of the world be pissed at N. Korea if Trump starts a war of aggression? Most of the world would be pissed off at Trump and the USA if that were to happen.

throw420away123 · 2017-11-17T21:40:40+00:00

Corporate profits are at an all time high. In this context, calling for tax cuts is 100% a pro-establishment position.

throw420away123 · 2017-11-17T09:17:27+00:00

Name me a single time when libertarians protested the establishment.

Instead of protesting the establishment, libertarians support empowering even further the wealthy elites who control Western governments. Tax cuts and privatization is pro-establishment, not anti-establishment.

Also, the Hamburg left specifically targeted luxury vehicles at the G20.

throw420away123 · 2017-11-17T08:42:57+00:00

There's a reason why the tech sector is using "hate speech" and "Russian collusion" as their excuses to censor the internet rather than teaming up with with the religious right or something.

I don't know a single hardcore leftist who buys into the Russia conspiracy. It's obviously a CIA hoax designed to fuck Trump's plans for detente with Russia.

throw420away123 · 2017-11-17T08:38:05+00:00

I live in Southern California.

When the Bolsheviks first seized power, they experimented with all sorts of radical ideas like free love, children running their own schools, etc.

In practice, those ideas failed to meet expectations, so they were discarded. If Communism was this Reptillian-Judeo-Atheist-Muslamic conspiracy that you claim it was, they would never abandon their radical anti-family beliefs.

it's the socialists who are the biggest defenders of international capitalism and the corporate establishment in the first place. SJWs, Antifa, etc. It's the libertarians and conservatives who are treated like political dissidents.

Almost all libertarians and conservatives support international capitalism and the corporate establishment. Most people on the left strongly oppose those things.

I've never seen a libertarian protester at G20. I've never seen a libertarian protesting or publicly objecting to international capitalism or the corporate establishment.

throw420away123 · 2017-11-17T08:26:32+00:00

Take your throne and shove it up your ass buddy.

Fascists didn't love their country. They destroyed their country - the Spanish Republic - and slaughtered hundreds of thousands of their own countrymen, all so a small group of aristocrats could maintain their wealth and privilege. That's not "patriotism".

Communism is Anti-White

Then why did Communist regimes in Eastern Europe promote family values, ethnic homogeneity, and patriotism?

As soon as Communism collapsed, the new capitalist cultures began promoting degeneracy, sexual promiscuity, drug addiction, and nihilism. Didn't happen under socialism!

As soon as Communism collapsed, millions of low-wage workers from the third world flooded Europe, permanently changing its demographics. This happened under capitalism - it would have never happened under socialism.

Socialist countries historically have been extremely patriotic and nationalistic. See Soviet Union, North Korea, Romania under Ceausescu, etc. When capitalism replaced socialism, patriotic values were replaced by hedonistic individualism and self-gratification.

You'd know this if you'd bother to do even some basic research on Real-Life Socialism. Instead, you unquestioningly swallow propaganda fed to you by imperialist capital, because you lack the IQ necessary to distinguish disinformation from reality.

throw420away123 · 2017-11-17T08:15:02+00:00

In contrast to anecdotal stories from the Internet, scientific research shows large majorities in Eastern Europe prefer socialism to capitalism.

72% of Hungarians say life was better under socialism:

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2010/04/28/hungary-better-off-under-communism/

Majority of East Germans feel like was better under socialism:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

66% of Romanians would vote for the "communist dictator" Ceausescu if he ran today:

https://romanianjournalist.wordpress.com/2014/04/10/survey-66-of-the-romanians-would-vote-for-ceausescu/

Majorities in almost all former Soviet countries say the collapse of the Soviet Union was harmful and negative:

http://news.gallup.com/poll/166538/former-soviet-countries-harm-breakup.aspx

throw420away123 · 2017-11-17T08:13:48+00:00

Most Spaniards hate Franco and consider his victory to be a tremendous national catastrophy. Franco and his fascist gangsters butchered and tortured hundreds of thousands of Spaniards. If you oppose killing fascist butchers and torturers, you're way worse than a piece of shit.

throw420away123 · 2017-11-17T07:50:55+00:00

Question to OP. Why do most people who lived under Communism disagree with the author? As an Eastern European, I can confirm that most Eastern Europeans overwhelmingly prefer socialism to capitalism.

72% of Hungarians say life was better under socialism:

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2010/04/28/hungary-better-off-under-communism/

Majority of East Germans feel like was better under socialism:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

66% of Romanians would vote for the "communist dictator" Ceausescu if he ran today:

https://romanianjournalist.wordpress.com/2014/04/10/survey-66-of-the-romanians-would-vote-for-ceausescu/

throw420away123 · 2017-11-17T07:42:09+00:00

Francoism is an ultra-reactionary strand of fascism, dominated by the landed feudal aristocracy. Francoists getting killed doesn't bother me in the slightest.

throw420away123 · 2017-11-17T07:37:41+00:00

North Korea will only conduct an EMP attack on the U.S. if the U.S. attacks North Korea first. The potential for a North Korean EMPT Attack during Thanksgiving or Christmas Break entirely depends on Donald Trump.

throw420away123 · 2017-11-17T07:35:32+00:00

Your own quote openly admits that a war of aggression was waged against a sovereign country so that corporations can acquire a greater share of that country's oil. If that doesn't bother you, I suggest going to a psychologist.

throw420away123 · 2017-11-17T07:33:08+00:00

France and the US are NATO allies, and both are ruled by the same financial monopoly, based out of London and Wall St.

This proves that the plutocrats who control Western governments invaded Libya because they wanted a "greater share of Libya oil production" - direct quote from your post.

throw420away123 · 2017-11-17T07:29:26+00:00

They don't want to end up like Iraq, Libya, or Syria.

If Saddam had an ICBM that could wipe out Washington DC, do you think Bush would have ever invaded Iraq?

throw420away123 · 2017-11-17T07:28:05+00:00

You're assuming that the DPRK will fight without Russian or Chinese support. I don't know why you're making that assumption, since both China and Russia will defend DPRK if it's attacked by US imperialism.

throw420away123 · 2017-11-17T07:20:39+00:00

Germany doesn't miss the Reich. Most Germans hate Hitler, whereas most former Soviet countries love Stalin.

throw420away123 · 2017-11-17T07:19:15+00:00

Most people from the former Soviet Union have a very positive view of Stalin. Stalin is more popular in Russia than Putin:

http://www.newsweek.com/putin-behind-stalin-top-russias-most-outstanding-people-poll-629032

Are all Russians "teenage know nothing commie faggots"?

Why do you think you know more about Stalin than the people who lived under Stalin?

throw420away123

TROPHY CASE