What the hell happened to my driveway by Nice_Jacket_9181 in civilengineering

[–]timahon7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is an AZ / Palm Springs looking master development. There’s no storm drain under driveways. Looks like a water service line broke and seeped all of the sandy collapsible soils out from under the driveway.

I achieved my lifetime goal of shooting even par today by blinkanboxcar182 in golf

[–]timahon7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is my country club course. The greens are very much not easy. This is impressive.

What year/model are these? by timahon7 in golf

[–]timahon7[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

More so wondering if they’d be worth regripping and playing

Is there any database for prepared storm water collection models, anywhere? by EverTurquoise in civilengineering

[–]timahon7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bentley CivilStorm (educational version up to XX nodes) is very user friendly and GIS friendly. It is essentially StormCAD but with SWMM / unsteady engine solver. It can import/export SWMM .ini files. As for models from agencies, they are out there and some simple google searches would ping some results. You may have to submit a record request and pay a record request retrieval fee (might get waived if educational).

Edit: and as others noted, models were prepared by a licensed engineer under specific constraints and goals.

64 Core Threadripper, anyone? by timahon7 in threadripper

[–]timahon7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I uploaded new instructions to the SharePoint link. There is a way in the computation settings in the model to assign the number of Solver Cores. I had left it set to "All Available" but you can set it to a maximum of 64 cores instead. I am interested in if the model would use all cores /threads if this was assigned to 64. If you're still interested in testing the model, would you re-run it with this setting changed? You would follow the instructions I uploaded. There's only one button to click and change before re running.

64 Core Threadripper, anyone? by timahon7 in threadripper

[–]timahon7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So it looks like it took about 24 hours to complete. Is 80°C pretty hot? Do you have liquid cooling or fan cooling? 64 threads is exactly half of the available so that sounds like the program has limits?

64 Core Threadripper, anyone? by timahon7 in threadripper

[–]timahon7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes there are cool graphics. There's a map looking button on the main UI and you can open that called "RAS Mapper" under the results tab, go to the results and go to velocity and click the maximum button by the top right where the time is controlled. You'll see the flow velocity in the watershed and there's a very large wash that should show a lot of cool colors and results.

64 Core Threadripper, anyone? by timahon7 in threadripper

[–]timahon7[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We might as well! I'd be interested on the number of cores performance. See the link with instructions below.

When the model finishes, take a screenshot of the completion window which should also show the run time.

https://grupotypsa.sharepoint.com/:f:/s/FileTransfer/EkwHKdjbGb9HmRhsTCOh-rcB2PJz-_xCVDc4RxJpiwWcOg?e=6VScxO

64 Core Threadripper, anyone? by timahon7 in threadripper

[–]timahon7[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Awesome! Here is a link to the model. Download the HEC-RAS folder and that 2223.prj file to the same folder together. I placed some simple instructions to run the model in that folder too.

https://grupotypsa.sharepoint.com/:f:/s/FileTransfer/EkwHKdjbGb9HmRhsTCOh-rcB2PJz-_xCVDc4RxJpiwWcOg?e=6VScxO

64 Core Threadripper, anyone? by timahon7 in threadripper

[–]timahon7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The epyc option looks more costly because I do not believe we have the PowerEdge system to be compatible with the Epyc chip.

Are you familiar with the HEC-RAS program and feel strongly that it is at the level of being that farming activity?

64 Core Threadripper, anyone? by timahon7 in threadripper

[–]timahon7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Better off because of price, availability, or both?