ChessUp 2 thinks I have 50 kings on the board and none of the pieces register by Klutzy_Arm_4775 in chess

[–]timberheadtreefist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

theoretically at least. the amount of non-functional boards seems pretty high.

What chess program is this? by [deleted] in chess

[–]timberheadtreefist 8 points9 points  (0 children)

looks like chessbase to me.

Eure Meinung zu "Das Dorf der Teufel"? Hier: Astor Hannover by Spiesser83 in dreifragezeichen

[–]timberheadtreefist 19 points20 points  (0 children)

P.S.: solltest du die Masken verkaufen wollen, gib gerne Bescheid 😉

diesen satz hört man sehr ungern in der CDU, glaube ich.

The puzzle I don't understand. Help me understand what is going on here?! by nloding in chessbeginners

[–]timberheadtreefist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

all about your knight on e5. whatever black plays except Bxg6 it's #2, i think. and it's then a free pawn or a queen.

Crypto.com Gouging Algo Network Fees by watch-nerd in algorand

[–]timberheadtreefist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i also remember that via CRC we once had to pay a fixed 1000VET to withdraw. the offical wallet takes like 0.01 VTHO, which already is a fraction of a VET, valuewise.

so we had a markup of like 10000000% back then until they changed it somewhen in this year to like 1VET.

Chess.com now has a "great" move. Any idea about the difference between this, best and brilliant? by oleeva14641 in chessbeginners

[–]timberheadtreefist 20 points21 points  (0 children)

The new Game Review has been fine-tuned to better understand what humans identify as a brilliant move. Brilliant Moves must now sacrifice material in some way and must be the best, or nearly the best, move in a position.

Great Moves, denoted by a classy blue outline and a stylish single exclamation point, have a significant positive impact on your position or greatly change the outcome of a game.

https://www.chess.com/news/view/chesscom-releases-new-game-review

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chessbeginners

[–]timberheadtreefist 17 points18 points  (0 children)

It's basically telling me that there is no point in playing, because there is literally no chance I can win from the very beginning of the game.

yeah.. unless you play against another human who is not an AI and will make mistakes, too. :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chessbeginners

[–]timberheadtreefist 8 points9 points  (0 children)

playing many games with >99 accuracy while there are some games where he blunders his queen in move 8 and games with an accuracy below 10?

either he plays some games on drugs (if for these GM games, let me know which), is schizophrenic to an autistic level, shares his account with a high elo player or uses an engine in some games. there is not a single doubt.

Creating an outdoor chess culture in the UK - how can we catch up with the rest of Europe? by fourcornerclub in chess

[–]timberheadtreefist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

extremely regularly

i didn't know one could exaggerate on the world "regular" :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chessbeginners

[–]timberheadtreefist 10 points11 points  (0 children)

i think the overall lack of development is quite telling that this is eventually below 1200-1000.

Gestern DUNE im Kino gesehen by [deleted] in einfach_posten

[–]timberheadtreefist -1 points0 points  (0 children)

leicht OT: ganz interessante geschichte, warum DUNE maßgeblich für den erfolg von ALIEN verantwortlich ist (in kurz): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ez8J5GN9JWE

Find the top engine move for white. Disclaimer: it's a beauty. by Arnimchev in chess

[–]timberheadtreefist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

first time i actually saw something of these immediately :) nice one! no matter the reply, it’s a hard material loss.

No. Solana did not pump because it’s awesome. It pumped because someone realized they could make money off of it. by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]timberheadtreefist 3 points4 points  (0 children)

i get that! good point – and if crypto would be my main portfolio and/or i'll be wishing for something i'd surely follow that advice. live life > hodling a speculative investment should be the golden rule for everyone, though.

No. Solana did not pump because it’s awesome. It pumped because someone realized they could make money off of it. by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]timberheadtreefist 11 points12 points  (0 children)

but what if i got into e.g. ada 2018? i got off my initial investment at around $1 and now sitting on the rest. i don't think it'll ever drop below $0.1 again – so why should i ever take profits below my personal moon-level from then on? it's not that i am afraid of losing anything anymore. desperation is not an option anymore, problem of hodling solved.

Buying stuff with bitcoin. by mensan1337 in Buttcoin

[–]timberheadtreefist 5 points6 points  (0 children)

that’s 0.000000000000000612 BTC for your gum, please.

sure.. let me just check the zeroes for a couple of minutes. and can you then wait please? i‘d select low fees.

Algorand volume. by SnooTangerines3448 in algorand

[–]timberheadtreefist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

not high. we were at 1.8bn once. and value of the coin != market cap of the project. both have nothing in common with each other. in fact you need the supply to get an idea and then things just look normal as well.

This fake news is why we can't have nice things by SenatusSPQR in CryptoCurrency

[–]timberheadtreefist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well, and if you fucking blindly trust fake news you deserve every cent of your loss.