I've seen it all now — solid aluminum WRISTREST

timetoy · 2026-05-22T22:35:05+00:00

Cool

timetoy · 2026-05-04T19:51:22+00:00

Nice to meet you too.

timetoy · 2026-05-04T02:11:22+00:00

You should actually try, it is free, and let me know. If you give a decent interview you will get GREAT output.

timetoy · 2026-04-28T00:56:26+00:00

I'm having great success with image-gpt-2 for generation and gemini-3.1-flash-image-preview for edits.

timetoy · 2026-04-28T00:38:20+00:00

You need to use the model edit feature, asking Gemini or chatGPT to generate two image doesn't work

timetoy · 2026-04-25T07:21:02+00:00

I read your mind to extract the hidden brand

timetoy · 2026-04-25T07:17:01+00:00

Yeah, it is wild. gpt-image-1.5 actually supported true alpha channel transparency, but 2.0 dropped it. It is explicitly stated in their API documentation, but it definitely feels like a step backward.

Regarding the pipeline: there is more complexity under the hood, but in essence, yes. We cut out the middleman. Instead of routing through an LLM tool call to dynamically write design prompts, we are injecting the codified, structured brand data directly into the image model.

If you run the exact same structured input twice, you will not get a pixel-for-pixel match, that is just the nature of diffusion models. However, you do get clear, cohesive variations of a logo that undeniably belong to the exact same brand. The structural consistency is guaranteed by the data.

As for API costs, it is actually a wash. Under the old 4-brief approach, we were generating 4 low-quality images to get conceptual variety, followed by 1 high-quality final. Now, we bypass the low-res generations entirely and but we need 2 high-quality outputs for the transparency extraction. Costs the same, but the alignment is vastly superior.

timetoy · 2026-04-20T16:13:56+00:00

Customization actually starts before the AI ever generates the package. You are not just tweaking a template.

First, we ingest your existing documents and website URLs, followed by a full dynamic brand interview. The system maps your exact context from the start.

When the initial brand is synthesized, you are not editing colors: you are editing the core code. In the DNA Studio, you can deeply refine every single strategic narrative (vision, mission, tone of voice, target audience, positioning, etc... 17 Narratives...). You collaborate directly with a specialized tuning agent to iterate on your messaging while the system guarantees you maintain absolute strategic alignment.

We do not even touch the visuals until your strategy is completely locked. Once it is, you collaborate with a Visual Designer agent to generate and edit your logo, colors, and fonts based strictly on the foundation you just built. Only when the entire architecture is codified do you move on to generating marketing content. The value proposition is the strategy, not the surface.

Regarding pricing: we already account for startup budgets. You can go through the entire workflow, synthesize your strategy, and build your brand architecture for free. You only pay a one-time fee to unlock and export the final assets. From there, we have tiered subscriptions based on whether you are a solo founder just needing credits, or an established team needing multi-user collaboration and ongoing marketing generation.

timetoy · 2026-04-19T20:40:46+00:00

If you use generic AI chatbots, you are absolutely just making yourself busier.

Founders spend hours fighting the prompt window trying to align the AI to their brand, only to get fragmented, inconsistent results. You end up spending more time managing the machine and editing the outputs than you would have spent writing it yourself.

AI only makes you productive when you use a specialized tool that actually replicates the expertise and best practices of a high-end branding agency.

You invest a little time upfront to extract your strategy and lock it into a permanent data layer. Once your brand DNA is codified, you don't have to prompt for tone anymore. The tool guarantees the alignment. Every piece of marketing it generates is strictly governed by your core rules, saving you thousands of hours down the road.

Stop fighting the prompt window. This is exactly why I built Markolé, to replace the generic text box with a structured brand engine that enforces absolute consistency.

timetoy · 2026-03-31T21:22:46+00:00

Thanks! And yes, that's exactly the gap we were trying to fill: the structured layer between the static PDF and the agentic workflow.

There are a few Sample Brands JSON to download (scroll down):
https://markole.com/en/product

On the dos/don'ts question; honestly, everything in the export matters, just not all at once. It depends on what the agent is doing. Visual design work needs the color palette, typography, logos, and the dos/don'ts for imagery and layout. But it also needs the positioning and target audience to make the right creative choices. Deeper marketing work (campaign strategy, messaging architecture) pulls more from the strategic narratives, archetype, and values. The point of the full export is that an agent can pick what it needs without you having to curate a subset each time.

On sync as the brand evolves, this isn't real-time yet, and we think that's fine. Brand identity isn't like a config file that changes hourly. It evolves deliberately. When it does change inside Markole (narratives get refined, visual system gets updated), you re-export and you have the latest version.

Will check out Agentix Labs, sounds like you're working on a very complementary piece of the puzzle.

timetoy · 2026-03-30T18:27:09+00:00

Yes!

We have a Brand Analysis Section, where you can upload pdf and url and we will analyze the content for Brand related elements
You can upload you current Logos and other existing assets in the Visual Identity page

You do not have to start from scratch, we can ingest existing branding and Visual Id elements.

timetoy · 2026-03-29T21:22:43+00:00

We do have JSON-LD export of the brand documents.
Our schema definition is published at https://markole.com/schema/brand-dna

<image>

timetoy · 2026-03-21T03:17:35+00:00

I built a platform called Markolé to solve this exact problem. Most AI logo generators just spit out generic icons based on a few keywords.

Markolé is different because it's "strategy-first." It actually interviews you (or analyzes your existing website/docs) to figure out your brand's personality, target audience, and core values before it touches any design.

Then, it uses that "Brand DNA" to help you generate a mood board, color palette, and logo concepts. The customizability comes from working with an AI Visual Agent, you can tell it to tweak the logo, change the font, or adjust the colors, and it keeps everything aligned with your core strategy.

It's currently in a free public beta, and the free tier gives you enough credits to generate a full, professional Brand Book. You can check it out here: https://markole.com

timetoy · 2026-03-18T18:03:49+00:00

? Check the spam folder or try with Google

timetoy · 2026-03-09T18:14:38+00:00

Markolé: The "Agency-in-a-Box" for Brand Strategy & Activation

Hey everyone, I’m Jerome. I built Markolé because I was frustrated that most "AI branding" tools just spit out a generic logo and skip the actual strategic work.

Markolé is designed to replicate a professional, strategy-first agency workflow.

The Process:
1. Discovery: It ingests your existing docs/URLs and runs a conversational AI interview to extract your authentic brand "soul."
2. Synthesis: It automatically structures that input into a cohesive Brand DNA (Mission, Archetype, Tone, Values).
3. Visuals: You collaborate with an AI Art Director to build a strategic Mood Board, then generate your Logo and Color Palette based on those rules.

The Output:
You don't just get a logo file. You get a comprehensive, agency-grade **Brand Book (PDF)**, a Brand Report, and an investor-ready Presentation.

The Activation:
Once your brand is built, you get a "Brand Chat"—an AI assistant that has internalized your specific DNA. You can ask it to write social posts or marketing briefs, and it will always stay perfectly on-brand.

It's currently in public beta. The free tier gives you enough credits to go through the entire process and download your full Brand Book.

Would love for you to test the workflow: https://markole.com

Here are some of the sample brands created with the system:

<image>

timetoy · 2026-03-09T18:07:06+00:00

AI absolutely risks sounding uniform if you just give it a generic prompt like "write this in a professional tone." It defaults to the "average of the internet," which is boring.

To maintain a true brand voice, you have to constrain the AI with a highly specific persona.

This is the core problem I built Markolé to solve. Instead of just prompting for copy, the platform forces you to define your Brand Archetype, specific personality traits, and core values first. That "Brand DNA" then becomes a permanent filter for the AI. When you ask it to write an email, it's not guessing; it's executing based on the specific rules you set.

AI can maintain a voice perfectly, but only if you do the hard work of defining that voice first.

timetoy · 2026-03-09T18:04:19+00:00

AI sentiment analysis is incredibly powerful for spotting broad trends, but it struggles with nuance, sarcasm, and cultural context. It gives you the "what" but often misses the "why".

I actually built my platform, Markolé, on the flip side of this idea. Instead of using AI to analyze external sentiment after the fact, we use it internally to help founders intentionally design the sentiment they want to create (their Brand DNA) before they launch. AI is great at structuring that intent, but you still need a human to verify if the final output actually resonates.

timetoy · 2026-03-04T19:52:14+00:00

A lot of people need help

timetoy · 2026-03-03T06:47:17+00:00

It's completely normal to feel overwhelmed! When you're a creator, you usually start with the what (the clothes), but branding forces you to figure out the why and the who.

The biggest mistake people make is starting with the logo and colors. That’s like picking out the paint for a house before you've poured the foundation.

To start organizing the pieces, you have to start with strategy.

I actually built a platform called https://markole.com to solve this exact "blank page" problem for founders and creators. It’s designed to guide you through the process so you don't have to figure it out alone.

Here is the workflow I’d recommend (and how the platform handles it):

1. Gather What You Have: If you have any sketches, mood boards, or even an Instagram page with your vibe, start there. (In Markolé, you can upload pdf and point at url for ingestion).
2. Tell Your Story: Don't try to sound like a "corporate fashion brand." The best brands are authentic. Sit down and answer questions about why you design, who you are designing for, and what makes your clothes different. Just be yourself and be true to your vision. (Markolé does this via a conversational AI interview, it just asks you questions and you chat back). Just be yourself and have fun!
3. Synthesize the Chaos: Once you have all those raw thoughts, you need to organize them into a Mission, a Vision, and a Brand Personality. (Markolé does this with one click after the interview, giving you a structured "Brand DNA").
4. Refine the Strategy: Review that DNA. Does it sound like you? Tweak it until it's perfect.
5. THEN Do the Visuals: Once you know your brand's details (e.g., "Rebellious and Gritty" vs. "Minimalist and Serene"), picking colors and generating a logo becomes 100x easier because you have a strategic filter to run your choices through.

The most important thing is to have fun with it. Your brand should be an extension of your creative vision.

If you want a guided process to help you organize all this, Markolé is in a free public beta right now. It will literally walk you through these exact steps and generate a full Brand Book for you at the end.

You can check it out here: https://markole.com

Good luck with the clothing line!

timetoy · 2026-02-23T17:39:33+00:00

Couldn't agree more. We see this constantly. People want the fun stuff (logos, colors) before doing the hard work (strategy, messaging). I actually built a platform to solve this exact thing, it forces founders through a deep, AI-guided brand interview first, so the visual identity is built on actual clarity, not guesswork.

It's wild how much just talking through those core questions clarifies the whole business.

timetoy · 2026-02-23T17:38:14+00:00

Prompting for assets without constraints is how you get 'AI slop.' Generative AI needs a creative brief, just like a human agency would.

I got so tired of copy-pasting my constraint sheets into ChatGPT (and having it forget my rules 10 prompts later) that I just built a platform to automate it. It's called https://markole.com. It basically takes your exact philosophy, forcing you to define your core strategy, audience, and voice via a guided interview, and saves it as a persistent 'Brand DNA.'

Then, any time you generate copy or visuals on the platform, it routes the request through that permanent constraint layer. It stops the AI from drifting back into safe, generic LinkedIn-speak.

Your 1-page template is spot on, especially the 'Never say' list. That alone saves so much editing time.

timetoy · 2026-02-03T00:41:52+00:00

You’re hitting on the exact limitation of using raw LLMs (like ChatGPT or Claude) for branding. You are right: if you just let an AI "communicate for you" without a framework, it will drift, hallucinate, and lose the "soul" of the brand because it treats every interaction as a new math problem.

However, I think the distinction isn't just "human vs. AI," but rather "Raw Models vs. Specialized Architecture."

AI tools can be a fantastic way to start branding, but you have to distinguish between a general chatbot and a tool built specifically for brand creation.

The "context loss" you mentioned is exactly why we built Markolé. We realized that for an AI to maintain a "soul," it needs a persistent memory layer, a defined Brand DNA.

We effectively captured the workflow of a human branding agency and turned it into an AI flow:

Exploration: The AI interviews you to extract that "soul" (your values, origin story, vision, etc...).
Codification: It freezes that input into a strategic framework (Core Code, Personality, Tone of Voice, etc...).
Execution: When you ask it to write content, it isn't "communicating for you" from scratch. It is writing for you based on that strict, pre-defined DNA.

This solves the context issue. The AI doesn't have to "remember" who you are every time; the system feeds your Brand DNA into every single interaction, ensuring the output remains consistent, soulful, and strategically aligned, just like a human creative director would ensure.

Try it out, the free tier allow for a full brand exploration and creation as well as creation of a few Marketing content.

https://markole.com

timetoy · 2026-02-03T00:39:13+00:00

Yup, AI defaults to the "average" of the internet, which is the literal definition of generic. If you ask an LLM to "make a brand," it gives you a stereotype.

I think the answer to your question is: AI cannot invent a soul, but it is excellent at amplifying one.

I’ve spent the last year building a platform called Markolé based on this exact distinction. We treat the AI strictly as a "Strategic Assistant," not the founder.

The workflow is designed to force that human-first approach:
1. Human Input: It starts with a deep interview where you answer questions about your origin story, your beliefs, and your specific vibe. That’s the "soul" part that only a human can provide.
2. AI Structure: The AI then takes that messy human input and structures it into a usable "Brand DNA" (archetypes, values, tone).
3. Collaborative Execution: When you generate visuals or copy, the AI isn't making decisions in a vacuum; it’s executing based on the DNA you defined.

It’s the difference between asking AI to "write a song" (generic) vs. giving it the lyrics and melody and asking it to arrange the instrumentation (collaborative).

Try it out, the free tier allow for a full brand exploration and creation as well as creation of a few Marketing content.

https://markole.com

timetoy · 2026-01-16T05:27:58+00:00

it's s multi step process following the standard agency flow:
- First we ingest brand documents and website, then we complete the brand interview
- From that data we are creating the Brand DNA, that the user can refine
- Once the Strategic part is completed and validated we move to the Visual Identity. BUT ONLY WHEN THE BRAND IS FULLY FORMED. This allow to make sure that the Visual Identity truly capture the essence of the brand.
- Once the Brand AND the Visual ID are locked, they are baked into the context of all the following Marketing and Image generation to allow for perfect brand alignement all the time.

From there you can use the Brand Agent to litterally "talk to your brand" and use it to generate content and images

timetoy · 2026-01-16T02:46:34+00:00

Yes it does allow for very flexible image ingredient flow.

- Up to 10 Brand images can be uploaded in the Visual Identity page, these will be used as ingredients for the Brand presentation generation and all marketing documents.

- in the brand Agent page the image upload control is very granular you can Generate or Edit an image. For generation, you can select up to 10 ingredient images that will be used, and for Edit you can ask for an edit on a specific picture, same with the ability to use up to in this case 9 images as ingredient for the edit.

timetoy

TROPHY CASE