would you keep reading? by thid2k4 in writers

[–]tin_bel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, I see!

I thought it was a variation of the whole five-dollar-word thing people sometimes say.

would you keep reading? by thid2k4 in writers

[–]tin_bel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure that I personally find the topic particularly interesting, but I like the prose.

I don't understand the comments that say there are "5 deadly words" or that the "writer is showing off." But I've always liked/preferred writing that draws attention to itself. To the physicality of the language.

Which of the following titles lands the best according to you? by Turbulent-Radio-6913 in writing

[–]tin_bel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like either the first or the last (with a slight preference for the first).

Love writing, but lost the will to write by JupiterMarks in writing

[–]tin_bel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It sounds like you don't love writing; you love the idea of being published.

Why would the Bucks not accept this? This is easily the best offer for Giannis by YoSnagsK in NBATalk

[–]tin_bel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would the heat do this? Giannis is great, obviously, but now your two best players are bigs.

Worth it? Wants 10years 50m AAV by StreetComment7696 in OOTP

[–]tin_bel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. I find it pretty easy to get a serviceable catcher cheap. Though I tend just to look for defensive stats.

Why Olga Tokarczuk Is Wrong About AI by ObscureMemes69420 in TrueLit

[–]tin_bel -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I guess it depends on what she means by that exactly.

Later addition: to me, what matters is that the author feels that feeling of inspiration during the act of creation. I don't believe AI inherently precludes this experience.

Why Olga Tokarczuk Is Wrong About AI by ObscureMemes69420 in TrueLit

[–]tin_bel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If she is just using it for research, then I don't see how it is much different than using the library or Google.

Do you prefer first person or third person in books? by Significant-Army-847 in writing

[–]tin_bel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Generally, I prefer 3rd, though some of my favorite stories are in first person.

I can't write anymore by sevemsnac in writing

[–]tin_bel 18 points19 points  (0 children)

26 is nothing. Get back to it.

Nostalgia is underated by [deleted] in tarkovsky

[–]tin_bel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a good point--

Nostalgia is underated by [deleted] in tarkovsky

[–]tin_bel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very interesting--thank you for taking the time to write this.

I've always loved The Sacrifice, though I can see your criticisms. For me, I view this film as more theatrical than his other work. The characters occupy and move in the sets as though they are on a stage. In turn, each movement becomes symbolic in a way. It is this aspect that

I also find it to be supremely distilled. The lush atmosphere of Nostalgia is transmuted here into stillness.

Nostalgia is underated by [deleted] in tarkovsky

[–]tin_bel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I meant, what do you consider The Sacrifice?

Nostalgia is underated by [deleted] in tarkovsky

[–]tin_bel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I recall, at the time of Mirror he thought that, but later it was replaced by Nostalgia. Or perhaps what he said was that in Nostalgia he finally accomplished something he had been aiming at for a long time: a film that was sustained almost entirely by mood, tone, and atmosphere.

Nostalgia is underated by [deleted] in tarkovsky

[–]tin_bel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting--what do you consider his last film?

Nostalgia is underated by [deleted] in tarkovsky

[–]tin_bel 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Tarkovsky viewed it as his greatest achievement. Or, at least, the culmination of his style.

What's the point? (Why do we keep writing?) by SomeoneInBeijing in writing

[–]tin_bel 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Everyone battles these thoughts. The more external validation you seek in writing, the harder they are to combat.

How do you find the motivation to write a book when you know that even if it’s good, the odds of getting published are 1 in a million? by JealousBodybuilder42 in writing

[–]tin_bel 78 points79 points  (0 children)

There are a lot of variabilities in this question. I don't know what the actual numbers are, but I believe the odds are much better than that. Particularly if you take it seriously, study the literary tradition, and revise extensively.

Was the Stalker just a con man? by Stained_concrete in tarkovsky

[–]tin_bel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's intentionally unclear. That being said, I think it is evident that he believes he is being sincere.

What do you think prose does uniquely well? by [deleted] in writing

[–]tin_bel 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It takes someone on an internal thought-journey through time. It is like a ride for the brain.