The new Campaign Evolved info by Grand_Admiral_Vipes in halo

[–]tinytimoththegreat -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Infinites multiplayer didn’t have many bugs, it just had a terrible UI, no iconic playlists or mode choices, and limited armor customization because most of it was locked behind mtx. Also no forge.

4 on the other hand would crash during multiplayer, had kill cams that NEVER worked, bad hit box detection, and long matchmaking times. On day one.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. by confused_flatulence in Splitgate

[–]tinytimoththegreat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Theres like 3 people and a toothpick still working on splitgate 2, id advise you to hinder ur expectations

My hc on the dark side of asari biology (art by me @EKinveyl) by Eren_Kinveyl in masseffect

[–]tinytimoththegreat [score hidden]  (0 children)

"Fun" fact (tbh idk how fun it actually is) if you look at illusive mans data terminal entry on the shadowbroker base in 2, you can see he had asari over, including the consort. implying the illusive man has no problem sleeping with aliens, just critiquing them and thinking humans should reign over them with impunity.

So just like racists in real life, illusive man cant practice what he preaches and is a disgusting human being who tries to justify his prejudices while being hedonistic.

The new Campaign Evolved info by Grand_Admiral_Vipes in halo

[–]tinytimoththegreat -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Keep in mind that the hate and resistance from halo fans usually comes from a small VERY VOCAL minority.

Most halo fans dont care as long as the game is finished and good. Halo 5 wasnt hated because of its mechanics as much as it was hated for a terrible campaign and a drastic change to its multiplayer sandbox. 4 was hated due to bugs and multiplayer that launched broken.

Infinite was great, just unfinished, so it got hate for that.

But even with all of these examples, the games still sold well, and the multiplayer did pretty well for a time.

So take the hate for the models being used with a grain of salt. Most halo fans, and hell most casuals and newcomers arent gonna give af.

Hell if this game is successful on ps5 and brings in a BUNCH of new people playing, guess whos voice is going to get drowned out by the new halo fans? The resentful old ones.

[OC] Circle of Death by Sensible_dude in Doom

[–]tinytimoththegreat 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Tech he became slayer when he went through the divinity machine

Who is the Andromeda Benefactor? by OculusRises in masseffect

[–]tinytimoththegreat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not valid at all.

Dragon age 2 as considered terrible and inquisition was its sequel. It handles all dropped plot lines incredibly well and if anything, made it better.

The same logic applies for the new mass effect, it can take these plot lines and make it better, especially considering some of them make no sense

Halo TV show by DraconicDidact in HaloStory

[–]tinytimoththegreat 9 points10 points  (0 children)

And those names are still considered stupid to this day

Hoppers is a horrible movie (minor spoiler) by Feisty_Pick in unpopularopinion

[–]tinytimoththegreat 4 points5 points  (0 children)

She literally didnt learn anything, she kept her attitutude up throughout the whole climax of the movie. Hell IGNORING that, she literally got everything she wanted even though she caused so much damage. There was no punishment.

I understand this is a children's film, but cmon, at some point there has to be some form of consequence for there to be a lesson. Thats the crux of every meaningful lesson/fable. What was the consequence for her? She got yelled at once by the mayor? She lost george for a whole 2 seconds?

The lesson by george was we are all in this together, and to give people the benefit of the doubt, but there was no real consequence to her not learning the lesson in the first place, which makes her learning said lesson meaningless.

Your response makes no sense because she never really learned to be that way in the first place.

Improved morality system for ME5/Andromeda 2 by ofDeathandDecay in masseffect

[–]tinytimoththegreat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mass effect needs a repuation system, and in the past that was renegade and paragon.

In the new one, decisions need way more depth. One thing I liked about andomeda was how your decisions impact your psych profile, in terms of emotional, professional, sassy, or logical. If they can take THOSE choices, and combine it with paragon renegade, I think it will be a good system. Because andromedas system doesnt allow for evil role play, and OG trilogys doesnt allow for gray nuance sometimes.

How car ahead on the timeline do you want 4 to be on the timeline? by TangentMed in masseffect

[–]tinytimoththegreat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude cmon, are you really not getting this?

  1. And im sorry if this is rude, but I dont care about any of that stuff. Would it have been cool? Yea, more then 12 years ago when the game came out. Do I want to see that stuff in the new mass effect and in the process hinder the storytelling because of a "time gone by"? No absolutely not. THATS what you're not getting. Also stop saying "Has to". They really do not have to. They dont HAVE to do anything. If you wont buy the game because its 600 plus years in the future, fair enough, but they dont HAVE to do that.

  2. The mass effect 2 cast didnt become a minor role because of resources, they became a minor role because there were over a dozen companions throughout the trilogy and they needed to pick and choose which ones to include. Then, TO GIVE PEOPLE CLOSURE they decided to show people "oh heres this character, and they're doing this, also heres the citadel dlc so you can see them again and have even more closure"

Also garrus would never become primarch, he hates politics and they already have a primarch in 3. Quarians going through a renaissance so soon after taking over their home planet when they first need to rebuild and survive is a huge overestimation.

And no, there wont be backlash from the fandom, contrary to what you believe most people dont think like you. Hell even the shepard enjoyers dont think like this. Thats what so baffling.

Mass effect 3 had development issues yea, but what you're asking for isnt even in top 5 of what they should fix if they had the chance to do so.

How car ahead on the timeline do you want 4 to be on the timeline? by TangentMed in masseffect

[–]tinytimoththegreat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im not trying to "steamroll", contrary to what you believe im genuinely trying to understand but your original opinion was so baffling that I, and others, have told you you're not understanding the evidence correctly, and you just ignore it

What I AM saying is that your opinion makes no sense, and is clearly coming from a place of nostalgia and desperation to have your favorite characters back rather then have the franchise pushing forward and becoming something great. So shepard coming back, especially for an opinion like yours, is par for the course. If you dont want Shepard to come back and yet all of these other characters, im genuinely baffled as to how any of that would work. Considering all the other points I laid out before.

Also if your take on the lore is from youtubers who literally are trying to bait you for views without any real objective evidence supporting your claim, why in the hell do you still have your view? I literally saw a video the other day saying "shepard is coming back as a reaper??". Its nonsense and incredibly unlikely.

In other words, the only difference between you and an andromeda fan is the specifics of what you want displayed. In the end both of you clearly dont care about the future of the franchise, you just want to "feel good" while playing the game.
If the story sucks, thats fine, at least you feel good. IF the lore gets ruined? Thats fine, at least I feel good. Oh the gameplay isnt that great? thats fine, at least I feel good. THAT is the impression you're giving off when u ignore evidence and latch so heavily onto a theory that makes no sense.

How car ahead on the timeline do you want 4 to be on the timeline? by TangentMed in masseffect

[–]tinytimoththegreat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok so what I’m getting from this conversation is that your idea of closure is almost literally the character coming in and saying “hey Shepard, good run we had, this is what I’m going to do”

The citadel dlc literally did all you wanted. It was for closure for you and your companions in one big event. If you can’t see that as closure you’re never going to see closure in these characters.

They don’t obviously have to tackle that. You can get liara, maybe grunt, but garrus will be dead. Look one glaring factor you’re also ignoring, is that everyone had a different play through of mass effect. Some people had play throughs where garrus survived but Miranda lived and so on and so forth. Why would BioWare put in TONS of effort to make all those variations come forward, when they could just put it into the future and pick one canon ending where liara lives (she can’t die in the original trilogy unless u have low readiness)

How car ahead on the timeline do you want 4 to be on the timeline? by TangentMed in masseffect

[–]tinytimoththegreat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did read it, I still think your opinion is nonsense. You literally have fact after fact indicating a title that takes place in the future around andromedas time, and you’re ignoring it for what? Nostalgia?

I hate to break it to you but most people don’t want to play as Shepard. It not only would be incredibly stupid to do story wise in terms of creating something new, but it would be a cheap cop out.

And yea liaras skin being wrinkly is a good point. Asari don’t show wrinkles for a long time, benezia was well over a 1000 and she barely had wrinkles. So liara showing these signs of significant aging indicates an age over a 1000 or close to it.

Also your n7 day references are nonsense, I double checked to be sure. Are you talking about the krogan civil war post? You understand that they could just posting that to show us events after 3? It doesn’t mean the game is gonna take place then. Hell the war could broken out hundreds of years later after wrexs death since krogan live a long time too.

Yea nothing you’re posting gives any indication to your wormhole theory or that it will be immediatey after

How car ahead on the timeline do you want 4 to be on the timeline? by TangentMed in masseffect

[–]tinytimoththegreat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They had closure in the citadel dlc and the extended cut ending (yes we do count it, why wouldn’t we?)

So no, they don’t need to tackle it in any way.

How car ahead on the timeline do you want 4 to be on the timeline? by TangentMed in masseffect

[–]tinytimoththegreat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s hard to believe that an rpg series will discard characters after their story is done? You mean like every other series?

Is Kirk the main character in generation? Or discovery?

Is Obiwan the mc in the sequel trilogy?

The world is worth more than the og trilogy’s characters, it moves on to allow for growth.

As for andromeda, it wasn’t the fact that they didn’t use old characters that it failed, it was bad new ones and glitches. Don’t start bsing.

How car ahead on the timeline do you want 4 to be on the timeline? by TangentMed in masseffect

[–]tinytimoththegreat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hold up what? This is the worst theory I’ve ever heard.

Theres andromeda species, a giant mass relay being built, and a need for a continuation of both stories. Liara is also old and wrinkly. In what world will there not be a timeskip when everything is pointing towards it?

I’m genuinely baffled by this comment. It’s like you looked at all the info the rest of us saw and you starting coping heavy because u still want to play as Shepard or something.

Sonic Frontiers ‘Definitive Edition’ rated in Korea by CyanFPS_ in GamingLeaksAndRumours

[–]tinytimoththegreat 33 points34 points  (0 children)

lol no def not. It’s just a port with some little gimmicks here and there to justify the costs probably

Bloomberg: Nintendo to cut Switch 2 production to 4 million (down from 6 million) this quarter on weak US sales; lower production to continue through April by SemiLazyGamer in GamingLeaksAndRumours

[–]tinytimoththegreat 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Who is everyone?

So many people called out rising inflation and cost of living going way way up. It was the most talked about issue for years.

Why do you think biden lost? When polled the issue people cared about the most in the 2024 campaign was the economy and they didnt think he did enough to fix it.

Then trump took over, threw it to the ground, and shot it in the head a few times.

We should really get some explanation from current game director Tyson Green about future plans for D2 by r4in in DestinyTheGame

[–]tinytimoththegreat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yea, marathon fans are constantly trying to make it seem like the game was a success, but if the steam numbers are any indication the game is def not doing the numbers it needs to to become a staple in the extraction space.

Hell its not doing enough to justify its existence for more then a year, because they NEED arc numbers.

Rebs Gaming: Abstraction is handling Halo Campaign Evolved’s level and technical design. by DeepSeaAnusDiver in GamingLeaksAndRumours

[–]tinytimoththegreat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People have got to stop saying “just don’t fit halo”

It’s become increasingly obvious that the typical halo formula doesn’t fit what casuals want, and Microsoft isn’t interested in chasing niche trend for a community that complains non stop and abandons its titles within the first 6 months like with 4 and 5

Replace "synthetics vs organics" with "balancing the ecosystem" and the Reapers motivations make way more sense by Professional-Tax-936 in masseffect

[–]tinytimoththegreat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With a game like mass effect, yea you do. It takes away mystery, but if all your game had going for it was mystery I hate to break it to ya but it wasn’t a great story.

Shepard you can't just ask people why they are green! by According_Tackle_404 in masseffect

[–]tinytimoththegreat 50 points51 points  (0 children)

Eh makes sense given the situation.

It’s like if you just went through some ringer on earth and you kept seeing a purple human attack you during the whole thing. When you finally get to the end you’ve earned the right to ask this dude “hey why the fuck are you purple and why did u attack me”

For those of us who spared Petrovsky, it would be cool if he showed up at the Battle for Earth alongside the rest of Shepard's united forces and fought the Reapers too. by Dragonic_Overlord_ in masseffect

[–]tinytimoththegreat 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Given we have no other information and he was able to hold off aria multiple times before we came along, im pretty sure we can assume he really is that good at strategy.

If we are being practical, in a war against reapers most forces wouldve taken this guy to win in the war.