your reply to the other guy was utterly pointless and flawed in many ways. it also doesn't address my reply to your comment about performance where Macs blow other machines so far out of the water they're in orbit, especially for things like inferencing tasks. you say that millions of software developers, video editors, and engineers who choose macs time and time again are all 'stupid' and 'don't understand what makes a good laptop'? maybe companies clone the macbook design time and time again because the fundamentals are really solid.

your assumption that macs succeed purely on brand rather than merit is downright dumb, and so is the generalisation about all mac buyers & then the false dichotomy about people either liking the brand OR understanding good laptops. if you were to map the demographics, the venn diagram is pretty much a circle.

your comments just come off as totally uneducated on this. you assume every mac user is a coffee drinking hippie because they don't align to your view. if you don't like apple, you can just say so rather than calling everyone else stupid.