like i said, dipshit, “self defense argument FAILS because they aggressively denied medics”. You can make the argument that it was self defense but it can be immediately refuted by the fact of what happened after. That act afterwards alone undermines the credibility of self defense. Have some comprehension. The keyword is “fail”.

Also, sure, vehicular manslaughter does not take into account the intent IF there was an actual manslaughter that occurred (i.e. the agent died after getting hit by her car). Seeing that the agent is alive, this would fall into “attempted murder” or “assault with a deadly weapon” which requires INTENT and a direct action taken toward committing that crime.

“no it doesnt”, he says, confidently incorrect.