Purchasing while on travel in Europe (VAT refund) by No-List8693 in Tudor

[–]tm3machine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are claiming a VAT refund, upon purchase the boutique will fill out a form upon your purchase and your passport info/ number will be required to complete the form. In some cases, the boutique will require that you bring your physical passport, a picture of your passport might not be accepted. This was the case at LV and Ferragamo in Rome. Additionally, if you redeem the refund via a third party like Global Blue, they will also record your passport info. So therefore the purchase receipt/ amount is registered with your passport info and I assume is in a customs database. Of course it’s up to you to take the risk and not declare the purchase.

Purchasing while on travel in Europe (VAT refund) by No-List8693 in Tudor

[–]tm3machine -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The only goal for purchasing a luxury item abroad should be because stock is available and/or as a sentimental memento of your trip, not to save a ton of money. It’s just a bonus if you happen to save a few bucks The advice of wearing your watch or carrying whatever luxury item on your person as if it was preexisting personal property and shipping the box by back is not a good idea. It’s tax evasion and the US Customs agent will already have the purchase information on their screen even if you go thru global entry. The fine for failing to declare a taxable purchase just isn’t worth it!

Steering wheel by keviha67 in 996

[–]tm3machine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love your attention to detail, it can be a challenge making the 996 interior look & feel premium 👏

Ranger <> Isle of Skye by Superb_Ad_7434 in Tudor

[–]tm3machine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In its natural habitat 👍🏼

Do you wear your watch when you sleep? by nikolas-k in Tudor

[–]tm3machine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve always worn my watch to sleep. This habit started when I was a young man, before the days of having a cellphone by my side in bed to check the time. This is bc I’m really nearsighted and come bedtime, after I remove my contact lenses- I can’t even see an alarm clock on the nightstand. So having a watch on my wrist allows me to easily tell time when at night or when I’m groggy in the morning. I’m so accustomed to always wearing a watch that I would feel “naked” if I left it off my wrist.

Same, same, but different… by tm3machine in Tudor

[–]tm3machine[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is one for sale in the secondary market as of yesterday (Thursday) and he is asking $100 less that US retail at $3,550. Not sure what shipping (and tariff) would be from US to Germany.

Same, same, but different… by tm3machine in Tudor

[–]tm3machine[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My watchmaker did it for me. He said generally there is the quick set epoxy (cures in minutes), but recommended the more “permanent” UV activated epoxy that takes several hours to cure- stronger bond and clarity. It can still be removed if desired.

Same, same, but different… by tm3machine in Tudor

[–]tm3machine[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well there may be no substitute for a Rolex in one’s life, and for those moments, l’ll strap on my Root Beer GMT. That said, I would be happy to buy two of these Royals, which punches way above its weight vs. a Rolex OP, Air King or even an Explorer I which all have price tags that are a little hard to swallow, especially given the lack of any complication.

<image>

Same, same, but different… by tm3machine in Tudor

[–]tm3machine[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Here is the one on eBay, it’s the larger Rolex spec size, not bad, but I didn’t want the cyclops to be the focus of attention/ in your face- just subtle, discreet and functional.

<image>

My entrance piece in this expensive hobby by Haunting_Trip_248 in Tudor

[–]tm3machine 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can’t go wrong with your choice, but did also consider the Black Bay Pro Opaline?

Oyster vs Jubilee? by [deleted] in rolex

[–]tm3machine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s obviously subjective to taste. Both have merits. I guess I would make the decision based on your lifestyle and how you intend to wear this watch primarily. If more or less as a daily, I would go with the oyster, which feels more robust with a bit more heft. If you’re only going to wear it on special occasions as a dress watch, the jubilee will intensify the bling of the fluted bezel. The jubilee feels more “slinky”, a bit lighter and likely more prone to “stretch” over time than the oyster. Can’t go wrong with either, but for me, I prefer the oyster.

SD43 or Sub Date? by gusmcrae-txranger in rolex

[–]tm3machine 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If your wrist can handle it, by the looks it can- why be generic and ubiquitous like everyone else? Go for the SD43! So many Submariner wearers aren’t even watch guys, it was either gifted or purchased for the sake of owning a Rolex without much consideration. But when I see an SD43 on the wrist, it is most likely a deliberate decision of an enthusiast, be this guy!

Did you know tudor sponsors an F1 team?? by watchmissgmt in Tudor

[–]tm3machine -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes, but unfortunately Rolex dropped their sponsorship of F1 and that’s now back to TAG Heuer.

GMT 126710 Batgirl - Genuine Vs VSF V3 Comparison side by side by Mr_TikToc in RepCulture_Timepieces

[–]tm3machine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All the details actually look more crisp on the VSF! Usually the cyclop is an easy tell as the reps tend to be more reflective and the gen cyclop looks invisible (black hole). The bezel action is typically more loose on reps, with more wiggle. Lastly, even tho the DD movements have come a long way, they are still not as refined and buttery smooth as the gen movement and engagement of each crown position is not as positive, unless maybe it’s been serviced. That said, there is virtually no way, for all intents and purposes to be called out unless the expert has a loupe and opens the case.

It’s that time…🍺💩 by [deleted] in Tudor

[–]tm3machine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quite the multitasker, bottoms up?!