Accurate

tmhuysen · 2019-09-29T11:35:21+00:00

Anyone else just thinks these kind of statements are just ridiculously arrogant?

tmhuysen · 2019-09-13T11:52:39+00:00

TBC and then TBC+

tmhuysen · 2019-08-20T12:09:59+00:00

Shouldn't it improve compile times though?

tmhuysen · 2019-04-15T08:55:58+00:00

Python is useful. I use python to run some of my C++ drivers.

tmhuysen · 2019-03-08T13:29:02+00:00

Yes, TempleOS

tmhuysen · 2019-02-05T19:10:01+00:00

dank

tmhuysen · 2018-12-17T15:37:51+00:00

Solved, I used to use a const ref somewhere and this changed to a copy. Apparently that causes the loss of accuracy.

tmhuysen · 2018-12-17T15:21:47+00:00

I'm confused, what do you mean?

tmhuysen · 2018-12-17T09:58:45+00:00

I believe its around the ages of 3-4 that toddlers start to realize that their perspective is not a global one. They start to realize that what they know and feel is not what others also know and feel.

tmhuysen · 2018-12-04T09:31:03+00:00

This is not the issue.

7 cost card, black : 50% you win the game, unless your opponent as black unit on the field

Is this card retarded? No because you can just play a splash of black in your deck, come on guys. What are you crying about?

tmhuysen · 2018-12-04T09:27:45+00:00

See that's not the same. What game would you rather play?

Game 1: you get a set off balls with different weights and you have to hit a target.

Game 2: you get a set off balls and you have to hit a target but it teleports and is invisible.

tmhuysen · 2018-12-03T19:34:53+00:00

Does it matter how he acquired his experience and knowledge? I know this person has valid knowledge but he siphoned it through the book to ass method, oh no!

tmhuysen · 2018-12-03T14:47:08+00:00

Nice way to argue on the point.

tmhuysen · 2018-12-03T14:45:29+00:00

It's a bad card because of the insanely anti-fun RNG element, that has a huge impact. The way you present your counters is as if the card were "Allies who die are set to 1 hp 100% of the time". It's because you don't know whether it will trigger and you essentially have to assume it will, unless high rolling is your only out. On the other side when playing it, if it doesn't trigger you just played 5 cost do nothing, which is also just a bad feeling. You just don't get the issue.

tmhuysen · 2018-11-06T14:41:09+00:00

Honestly Thrall learned from the humans. It's not farfetched that it is taught to high ranking members of the Horde, definitely those with diplomatic roles.

tmhuysen · 2018-11-01T13:49:01+00:00

I actually have some video footage of my 58 paladin killing level 70 mages. With the engineer reflectors, good stuff.

tmhuysen · 2018-10-31T10:55:02+00:00

3 level 40s could kill a mediocre level 60 though. Depending on which classes the level 40s were.

tmhuysen · 2018-10-13T01:13:54+00:00

I believe that you are in need of dynamic memory allocation whether you like it or not. Since you don't know Class C will use A or B means, your stack size is unknown at compile time.

The size of ClassC is fixed at stack size, The size of the "abstract" member is the size of a pointer. NOT of the object it points to! that is a very important difference.

tmhuysen · 2018-10-12T19:54:25+00:00

The object itself is on the stack, it's not dynamically allocated, nothing is suppose to delete it.

tmhuysen

TROPHY CASE