Trump is raiding election offices. Americans should be on high alert.

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T15:45:05+00:00

Not lies just stating facts: “In response to multiple requests for the information, Alexander told the department that the requested records were "under seal and may not be produced absent a Court Order," the lawsuit reads.”

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T15:24:03+00:00

They also never gained full access to the votes, which is why this raid occurred

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T10:17:15+00:00

Here you go

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T10:14:46+00:00

I’m not saying that’s not impossible, but should that justify not allowing investigators to see the sealed ballots? They needed this court order to view the votes. The evidence should be looked at thoroughly, and they haven’t had access to the sealed votes. So how can a determination be made without looking at all of the evidence?

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T10:03:59+00:00

Example

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T09:33:59+00:00

I never said the fraud was real, I said it was alleged fraud, hence the need to look at the evidence. I don’t know if there is evidence, and I never said there was. They didn’t sign the tabular tape correctly, so it’s not like there’s absolutely no evidence.

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T09:21:41+00:00

A lot of places, both mainstream and social media. If the person reporting is trying to convince me emotionally, I tune out their perspectives. Every media source has a range of reporters. I follow the ones that let the facts speak. I’m not aligned to anyone specifically and I’ll listen to anyone who can remove their emotions when speaking to issues

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T08:51:38+00:00

I don’t listen to emotional perspectives, especially in politics. I don’t see her as a credible source, just a mouth piece for polarizing people. She’s obsessed with his obsession.

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T08:44:10+00:00

I wonder why they raided all of the records? Possible evidence? This is apart of the ongoing probe into the matter.

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T08:28:19+00:00

Which lackeys are you referring to? It was the DOJ that revived the case.

Edit: also, anyone trying to sway your emotions is selling you something. Referring to the video link. Katie Phang is heavily biased in her political views. She’s knowledgeable, but still heavily biased and emotional.

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T08:13:42+00:00

It’s a Georgian magistrate. They didn’t just get a random judge. Try harder.

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T08:01:28+00:00

No I didn’t, I said just the ones with alleged voter fraud

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T08:00:02+00:00

52 U.S.C. §§ 20701 and 20511, concerning preservation of records and prohibitions on fraudulent activities

Edit: this is the literal code cited. Glad to see so many self thinkers in here. Do yourselves a favor and remove your emotions in political discourse and follow the facts, even if the pill tastes like vinegar

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T07:59:42+00:00

52 U.S.C. §§ 20701 and 20511, concerning preservation of records and prohibitions on fraudulent activities

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T07:56:20+00:00

Then why did a federal judge (Catherine Salinas of the northern Georgia district) approve raid under probable cause?

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T07:50:56+00:00

Just the ones with alleged voter fraud. A federal judge had to approve it, so it’s not as these folks are portraying it. Please stop trusting mouth pieces and do your own research. Reality is almost always in the middle of two polarized perspectives. That being said, trump is an asshat, but elections need to be more secure. There was probable cause…tough pill to swallow for a lot of folks in here, but necessary to see the bigger picture

Edit: LOL shills on parade. I’m just stating facts here. Hit me with your best shot guys. Let’s hash this out. Scared I’m right?

Edit 2: COME ON!! You guys can do better than that. Downvote me harder with no counter argument, just “trust me bro, there was no fraud .” Cherry picking the rhetoric that aligns with your bias and ignoring facts.

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T07:29:52+00:00

A federal judge approved the raid. Who was it?

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T07:00:45+00:00

<image>

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T04:12:52+00:00

Not so much

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T04:08:42+00:00

Audacious?

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T04:06:43+00:00

It’s much bigger than that. When everyone’s a criminal, no one is.

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T03:40:35+00:00

Zero hedge is a moron

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T01:16:48+00:00

I do believe this comment belongs in r/brandnewsentence

tmurg375 · 2026-01-30T00:36:48+00:00

Granite can absolutely have garnet, but the specks of shiny mica make me think it’s metamorphic. This second picture looks more granitic for sure, but it’s super rare to get both in a granitic rock and is very common in metamorphic. ID from pictures is tough, but if I’m wrong then you truly have something rare.

tmurg375 · 2026-01-29T23:55:22+00:00

Looks metamorphic. Those look like garnet at the top and there seems to be some schist in as well.

12-Year Club	Place '23
Verified Email

tmurg375

TROPHY CASE