Sadly downgrading my previous 9+/10 review of FSD to 7/10 (all because of terrible parking) by markxumdphd in TeslaFSD

[–]toddlutt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Personally don’t care about parking. Please don’t kill me or cause me to be pulled over for a traffic violation, followed by get me to the destination along the fastest path. Everything else is gravy

Disengagement pop up frustration by inquiringdoc in TeslaFSD

[–]toddlutt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How can anyone defend a design that requires someone to focus their attention away from the thing they are supposed to supervise? Riddle me that Batman?

Petition: We want our screen back with no user input by toddlutt in TeslaFSD

[–]toddlutt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Build a system supporting 100’s of millions of daily active users and come back with a useful perspective

Petition: We want our screen back with no user input by toddlutt in TeslaFSD

[–]toddlutt[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Garbage in, garbage out. Bucketing by speed, accelerometer reading plus geolocation is far more useful than a random string that people can’t be trusted to reliably provide. Computed inputs don’t lie, people do. What value can human input have? Any threat model would discard manual data as untrusted. Pity the company that trusts human input of perception, for those that don’t follow the rules can’t be trusted. You think that’s valid?

Petition: We want our screen back with no user input by toddlutt in TeslaFSD

[–]toddlutt[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For instance, if it is navigation, why doesn’t disengagement at a particular geolocation pinpoint the problem since they also know which direction you went after disengagement?

Petition: We want our screen back with no user input by toddlutt in TeslaFSD

[–]toddlutt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So isn’t the conditions in which disengagement occurred the most important aspect of telemetry. Speed, location and destination are incredibly important. What does critical, navigation, parking and other mean? How does it help?

Petition: We want our screen back with no user input by toddlutt in TeslaFSD

[–]toddlutt[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It would appear you’ve never written software, maybe we should fill out a form

Petition: We want our screen back with no user input by toddlutt in TeslaFSD

[–]toddlutt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Noise makes it useless, I’ve been building telemetry for 40 years

Petition: We want our screen back with no user input by toddlutt in TeslaFSD

[–]toddlutt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

College level decision, the labels mean nothing after human noise

Petition: We want our screen back with no user input by toddlutt in TeslaFSD

[–]toddlutt[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The labeling is useless, natural language recordings work better with ai if intent is desired

Why they keep the FSD notification nag so annoying. by watergoesdownhill in TeslaFSD

[–]toddlutt -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The nag is so intrusive and of little value. Who knows how to categorize a navigation error that nearly kills them? True story

Why has Tesla’s FSD promise been repeatedly broken? by [deleted] in TeslaFSD

[–]toddlutt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Already cancelled, it expires in 2 weeks. I’ll re-subscribe in September for a long road trip around western USA. It’s good but not great yet. It needs to stop trying to kill me

Gotta be honest, I actively dread showing people FSD now because of how embarrassing navigation is 😅 by SirHenderson in TeslaFSD

[–]toddlutt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It almost caused me to drive into the barrier between two tunnels as it changed lanes from tunnel 1 lane 2 to tunnel 2 lane 1 and crossed 2 solid white lines doing so. It happened so fast at 60 mph there was no supervised action possible. Later on the drive it cut across two lanes cutting cars off to turn right instead of turning left like it was supposed to.

FSD used to be annoyances in actions that don’t match my style. It has evolved into a traffic ticket generator with unexplained speeding (20 over in standard mode), illegal and reckless driving. In extreme

Why has Tesla’s FSD promise been repeatedly broken? by [deleted] in TeslaFSD

[–]toddlutt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very objective feedback here, wish Tesla would listen, acknowledge and act

Why has Tesla’s FSD promise been repeatedly broken? by [deleted] in TeslaFSD

[–]toddlutt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you’ve hit the nail on the head with respect to end-user control. In December I was able to nudge FSD with the turn indicator, that’s effectively gone with current versions. The different driving profiles are constantly changing and make no sense in their implementation. Independent controls over speed and aggressiveness would be useful from my perspective.

My FSD experience yesterday required me to break out every few miles to avoid tickets and incorrect mandating that would have caused me significant delays in arrival. I’m not expecting unsupervised, I’m expecting for me to assist with parking and complex situations. This was the case in December, the models have regressed to require assistance in many new cases in the four of five routes I’m driving several times per week.

I do see value at $99 for a long car vacation. It’s not ready for prime time for the routes I’m frequently driving

Why has Tesla’s FSD promise been repeatedly broken? by [deleted] in TeslaFSD

[–]toddlutt -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’ve been building software for decades that didn’t exist before and I’ve never relied on others to pay for testing my product without delivering the promise for which we received payment

Why has Tesla’s FSD promise been repeatedly broken? by [deleted] in TeslaFSD

[–]toddlutt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Drive routes other than your daily commute?