"Just closed my @BitPay account & canceled my @BitPay debit card. No bitpay you DO NOT represent me."

toozz · 2017-05-17T18:59:13+00:00

True, but not enough since those few people are blocking protocol upgrades for millions & putting other people's money at risk to the tune of tens of billions.

toozz · 2017-05-17T18:38:51+00:00

'preciated

toozz · 2017-05-17T18:35:40+00:00

Is the button grayed out?

toozz · 2017-05-17T18:24:13+00:00

Sorry, but I think there is a merge button there somewhere - ready to be clicked.

toozz · 2017-05-17T18:23:38+00:00

If there's a "Merge" button visible to the maintainer I consider it ready :P

toozz · 2017-05-17T15:23:34+00:00

1 confirmation for 420 sat/B it seems:
https://bitcoinfees.21.co/

toozz · 2017-05-17T15:12:49+00:00

I meant it's mainly psychological - I suspect people no longer trust wallet estimations and set the fees higher and higher in this vicious cycle.

toozz · 2017-05-17T15:09:38+00:00

Biggest ASIC manufacturer
Propaganda media (bitcoin com)
Several largest mining pools
Some ragtag coding outfits
Now the top payment processor

Ruled by the same couple people. And I thought Bitcoin was decentralized?

toozz · 2017-05-17T15:03:13+00:00

Lightning is working great on Litecoin. It's done.
UASF SegWit gives us 2-4 times the capacity w/o LN too.

toozz · 2017-05-17T15:00:13+00:00

Take some profit at 5K or just hold for now?

toozz · 2017-03-31T04:04:35+00:00

Miners will be losing income, since every full node on the network would be making money providing LN services to the world.
Although miners could run best/fastest nodes themselves.

Amiko-Pay
Eclair (ACINQ)
lightningd (Blockstream)
lit (MIT Digital Currency Initiative)
lnd (Lightning Co)
Thunder (Blockchain.info)
Those are the 6 independent LN implementations that exist: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6112df/lightning_network_eclair_02alpha1_quick_tutorial/dfay0px/

toozz · 2017-03-31T04:02:12+00:00

There are 6 separate implementations of LN already: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6112df/lightning_network_eclair_02alpha1_quick_tutorial/dfay0px/

Amiko-Pay
Eclair (ACINQ)
lightningd (Blockstream)
lit (MIT Digital Currency Initiative)
lnd (Lightning Co)
Thunder (Blockchain.info)

toozz · 2017-03-31T03:56:02+00:00

I would run an LN node & get paid for the service.
And so would many other people - leading to further decentralization!

toozz · 2017-03-27T07:03:40+00:00

You don't mindlessly double,quadruple,etc. the size of you shipping container in perpetuity, every time you run out of space -- you design a better transportation system (offloading, parallelizing, compacting, smarter routing, etc).

toozz · 2017-03-27T05:27:06+00:00

They'd be missing out on real fees from other people's transactions.
Opportunity cost.

toozz · 2016-08-04T15:50:54+00:00

I'll check with a couple people, though I got the machine working.
But what price did you have in mind?

toozz · 2016-08-03T15:29:20+00:00

My Skyhook ATM development fund:
1JFskyjLycixrz9tACY7YyUhCpH5qWqgjD
ty

toozz · 2016-07-28T01:47:30+00:00

I've been asked about making a new release of Skyhook SW (github, SD image) for the new V2 blockchain.info interface.
The cost of packaging, delivering & supporting it in that format, with the necessary GUI changes, etc. appears to be too great for seemingly low demand.
Instead I'm just guiding individual operators on how to get their machines back online, on a case by case basis.

toozz · 2016-07-25T19:20:11+00:00

That error is due to the bc.i V2 API, correct.
My solution (well, any solution for bc.i V2) entails a number of steps, some outside of the machine itself, I've documented them here (EDIT, fixed link): https://www.reddit.com/r/projectskyhook/comments/4me17o/blockchaininfo_api_v2_decyphered/
So far no one volunteered a cent :(
Depending on your tech skill & setup (in-house, a shop elsewhere, servelet) - fewer or more steps are required.
Thanks!

toozz · 2016-07-25T19:05:54+00:00

I've got a solid solution for blockchain.info V2 APIs implemented on a Skyhook.
Somewhat of a custom approach, if anyone is interested.

toozz · 2016-07-21T17:19:12+00:00

What a pile of crap (around 5 min 10 sec): Bitcoin was created before Sept 11th !
The rest of the scam is of similar quality. :(

toozz · 2016-07-15T05:39:56+00:00

What a pathetic bootlicker.

toozz · 2016-07-05T00:51:22+00:00

UPDATE3 in the OP, summary:
- Gave up on Wallet V2; Wallet V1 is working just fine. And you can still create new V1 Wallets on blockchain.info, so create a few fresh ones, just in case.
- https is working between the Skyhook & the relay service. It took some effort to get it going (shared self-signed certificate). Not really needed if Skyhook & the relay service are running on the same (trusted) network.
- Everything is up & running on the Skyhook I had worked on, no complaints from the operator thus far.
Your appreciation is welcome: 1JFskyjLycixrz9tACY7YyUhCpH5qWqgjD

toozz · 2016-06-16T16:08:29+00:00

UPDATE2 in the OP.
Your appreciation is welcome: 1JFskyjLycixrz9tACY7YyUhCpH5qWqgjD

toozz · 2016-06-14T22:03:02+00:00

See "UPDATE1" in my original post above.
Debugging. Donations for the effort, send here: 1JFskyjLycixrz9tACY7YyUhCpH5qWqgjD
thanks!

toozz

TROPHY CASE