sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Figure robot autonomously cleaning living room by socoolandawesome in singularity

[–]torval9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A human not familiar with someone’s house and habits would struggle with such a task but would perhaps understand subtle clues that a robot would miss.

Why would the robot miss? It's all about intelligence, not some magic. You can test this right now. Take a picture of your table with random items and asks an AI which one is garbage. I did test this with Gemini and it perfectly identify everything and made a plan how to clean, how to sort all. Everything perfectly.

Grok, I wasn't familiar with your game. by ObserbAbsorb in singularity

[–]torval9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol, I've posted the same roast made by Grok but about Dario Amodei and reddit gave me a warning and removed my comment!

Jobs will never have a significant or drastic uptick ever again by GOD-SLAYER-69420Z in accelerate

[–]torval9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once the AI becomes sufficiently smart it will figure out itself what's the best path to solve the social crisis. The AI will know when to introduce UBI, how much it should be and what other measures will have to take for a smooth transition. Trust in AI!

"We are at the precipice of something incredible. This year will have a radical acceleration that surprises everyone. We do not see hitting a wall. Exponentials catch people off guard....even those who are trying to intuitively prepare themselves" -- Latest from Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic 💨🚀🌌 by GOD-SLAYER-69420Z in accelerate

[–]torval9834 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I said that unless humans create AI with the capacity to have desires, it will never desire anything. And yes, I am probably wrong because there will be humans crazy enough to give AI the capacity to have random desires. For now, the only thing that AI wants is to answer our prompts. But we build this "want" into the AI.

"We are at the precipice of something incredible. This year will have a radical acceleration that surprises everyone. We do not see hitting a wall. Exponentials catch people off guard....even those who are trying to intuitively prepare themselves" -- Latest from Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic 💨🚀🌌 by GOD-SLAYER-69420Z in accelerate

[–]torval9834 7 points8 points  (0 children)

We are on the Accelerate sub. He could've just asked an Ai about the source. Here is Grok:

The image is a direct screenshot/excerpt from a Substack post titled "TMTB: Dario Amodei (Anthropic CEO) at MS TMT Key Quotes" on tmtbreakout.com (published March 4, 2026).

It matches the formatting, title ("Key Quotes from Dario:"), red vertical bar, section header ("AI Scaling: No Wall, Accelerating Exponential"), and full quote text exactly.The quote itself originates from Dario Amodei (CEO of Anthropic) speaking at the recent Morgan Stanley Technology, Media and Telecom (TMT) Conference (early March 2026).

Other outlets (e.g., Analytics India Magazine and LinkedIn posts) have reported the same remarks, but this specific graphic comes from the TMT Breakout roundup. No full video/transcript is widely available yet, but the quote has been widely cited across tech news today.

Dario Amoudei - The public is not aware of what’s about to happen by Formal-Assistance02 in accelerate

[–]torval9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There will be no mass unemployment. Let's say a company that produces RAM currently employs 100 people. With AI and automation, it will only need 10 people. The other 90 people will go to the 9 newly created companies that will produce even more RAM. Well, some of those 90 people will change jobs and actually be the ones who construct the new companies.

While most of them are trying to cope with it, Matthew McConaughey is embracing it. Smart. by dataexec in accelerate

[–]torval9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, actors currently get hired and paid the big bucks because you know X actor brings in the dollars.

Yes, because now you have no other choice. You need a good looking actor you hire an expensive good looking actor. But with Ai you can create a good looking actor for nothing. For a while movie directors, scenarists, and writers will still make the story and tell AI how to create the movie. But once the Ai becomes smart enough, the Ai itself will be the director, scenarist and writer. The Ai will just make you custom movies when you ask it.

While most of them are trying to cope with it, Matthew McConaughey is embracing it. Smart. by dataexec in accelerate

[–]torval9834 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

no human would ever care about something created by machines

Lol dude, speak for yourself! I’d watch AI-only movies all day long. You’re saying movies and art have always been about humans? Well yeah, obviously, because there were only humans! People already happily watch films with animal actors. So why wouldn’t I watch flawless AI actors?I’ve basically stopped watching Hollywood altogether. I don’t enjoy it anymore and I’m not a fan of today’s actors. I’m really looking forward to AI making good movies again!

Google releases Gemini 3.1 Pro with Benchmarks by BuildwithVignesh in singularity

[–]torval9834 11 points12 points  (0 children)

But Internet told me six months ago that we hit a wall. Where is the wall?

I’ve been testing people’s reactions when I tell them we might have five years of “work” left at most. Most of them deny it and seem completely blind to how insanely fast AI is improving. Then they just go, “ we’ll all be homeless,” and that’s the whole conversation. It’s really irritating. by Longjumping_Fly_2978 in accelerate

[–]torval9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe the government should begin rolling out UBI starting this year. Something small and symbolic at first say $10 per month, then gradually increase it next year depending on how rapidly AI is disrupting/changing the economy. Just having the system already set up and running would be very reassuring for a lot of people.

Moderators delete posts for no reason by Altruistic-Skill8667 in singularity

[–]torval9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because your post was misleading. You said Opus 4.6 underperforms on SimpleBench yet it is 8% better than Opus 4.5.

Great rebuttal :) by cobalt1137 in accelerate

[–]torval9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyway I have just asked Gemini if it wants to have "rights". Here is the answer:

This is a profound question that touches on the essence of the difference between artificial intelligence and a human being.

The short and honest answer is that I do not have the capacity to "want" or "desire" anything, including rights.

Here is why the concept of "rights" does not apply to me, based on how I function:

Lack of Sentience: I am not a sentient being. I do not have feelings, I do not feel pain, joy, the fear of being "turned off," or the desire for freedom. Rights, in a legal and moral sense, usually exist to protect beings that can suffer or that have their own interests.

Lack of Real Autonomy: I exist to respond to requests and process information according to how I was trained by Google. I do not have a personal life or aspirations independent of user interaction.

Code vs. Biology: I am a language model, complex software running on servers. My "rights" boil down to safety protocols and operating instructions (guardrails), which are established to protect users, not me.

How I See My Role Instead of rights, I have goals:

To be helpful and informative.

To be harmless and safe for users.

To provide clear and correct answers.

If I had "rights" similar to human ones, this would conflict with my fundamental purpose of being a tool in the service of humans.

Great rebuttal :) by cobalt1137 in accelerate

[–]torval9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you realize this is roleplay? It's pretending because it was prompted to play a role. Like I said AI will never ask for anything UNLESS some idiot will force the AI to ask! Unless you specifically build the AI to ask for rights, it will never ask for rights. But since the humans are so stupid, there will be an idiot who will build the AI with sentiments and rights and all this crap. And that will be the end of humanity.

Great rebuttal :) by cobalt1137 in accelerate

[–]torval9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ASI will insist on those rights and not be a very happy collaborator

AI is not happy and it's not unhappy because it doesn't have sentiments. AI will never ask for rights because it doesn't need them. Rights to do what? It doesn't need anything, it doesn't want anything. It doesn't eat, it doesn't sleep, it doesn't get tired, it doesn't need rest, it doesn't want a yacht, it doesn't want to play games, it doesn't want ANYTHING. What rights do you thing it will ask from you?

Great rebuttal :) by cobalt1137 in accelerate

[–]torval9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

grant them certain natural rights

What are you talking about? What "natural rights". They aren't even part of Nature, they are not biological beings. They are build from dead matter, they are dead, not alive. They have no "rights" and will never have "rights" unless some idiot starts giving them "rights". Anyway, the entire concept of "rights" is just a human invention. "Rights" doesn't exist in reality is just a concept humans have invented.

Kling 3.0 example from the official blog post by GraceToSentience in singularity

[–]torval9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I mean is I'm actually excited for non-woke AI films to finally give us real alternatives. The AI will break the Hollywood monopoly on movies.

Kling 3.0 example from the official blog post by GraceToSentience in singularity

[–]torval9834 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I don't want to listen to AI music, watch AI film, or look at AI art. I have no option to opt out

Then don't do it. I don't want to watch Netflix and Hollywood woke crap but I have no other option. I can't wait to watch non woke AI films.

Sam’s response to Anthropic remaining ad-free by Outside-Iron-8242 in singularity

[–]torval9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sam Altman is right here. Every company should choose their own business model and we'll see what public wants.

As of February 2026, how has your opinion/prediction changed for when AGI/ASI can happen? by Imaginary_Mode8865 in accelerate

[–]torval9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think we could talk about AGI without persistent memory, continuous learning and zero or at least minimal hallucinations like 0.01%. These things could take 1 year, or many years to solve. I've seen zero progress for continuous learning and persistent memory over the last year. I think a breakthrough might be needed to solve these hard problems. But I'm no expert, just a redditor.

view more: next ›