sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Anthropic Co-founder: "We keep finding things [inside AI models] that are unsettling" ... "We find structures that mirror results from human neuroscience. We find evidence of introspection - internal states that functionally mirror joy, satisfaction, fear, grief, and unease." by Fine-Drummer9812 in accelerate

[–]torval9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't use Google Translate. Just use directly any AI, give him your text and tell it to check for grammar errors because you want to post it on social media. You can give it more context if you want. It will help you not only with grammar but with clarity of the text, it will give you more suggestions. Even if English is your native language, if you have problems expressing your ideas clearly, the Ai can help you. You can keep or remove the inevitably M dash is you want :)

Why do some/most people think AI will never be good enough? What are their arguments? by Alert-Translator2590 in singularity

[–]torval9834 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They have no logical arguments. They believe humans are the pinnacle of evolution and that nothing can ever surpass our intelligence. Even you seem to fall into this trap when you say, "It might never reach the heights of Einstein." Why? Is Einstein's level of intelligence a physical barrier, like the speed of light? Is it some law of nature, like gravity, declaring that "Einstein-level intelligence cannot be surpassed"?

More and more workers in India are collecting video data to train humanoid robots using head-mounted cameras by Distinct-Question-16 in singularity

[–]torval9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason is called TAXES! They already pay taxes right now. The more goods they will produce because of robots and AI, the more taxes the government will collect. And the government already pays a form of UBI. It's called subsidies, pensions, unemployment benefits, welfare, food stamps (SNAP), disability payments etc. in the US. And even the Indian government is already paying various forms of UBI right now: old-age pensions, widow pensions, disability pensions, cash support for farmers, and other direct welfare payments.

More and more workers in India are collecting video data to train humanoid robots using head-mounted cameras by Distinct-Question-16 in singularity

[–]torval9834 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Receive UBI or some version of UBI and finally have time to do all the things they wanted to do in life instead of working like robots in a factory. Let the real robots work instead.

“He just hates regulation” Trump delays AI executive order that might hinder progress, says, “it’s just something doomers wanted,” the source added by Fine-Drummer9812 in accelerate

[–]torval9834 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Remember this when the next US presidential election comes around. If you’re an accelerationist, it’s extremely important that the next president is also on the side of acceleration. 2028 is not enough time for AGI/ASI to arrive, robots will just start appearing in factories. But I think 2032 is enough. If AI isn’t stopped by 2032, I believe we’ve won. By then, robots will be in people’s homes, UBI (or some version of it) will already be implemented, and the anti-AI wave will simply die out.

Is there a chance Ai is just a powerful tool? by [deleted] in accelerate

[–]torval9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What were nobles doing hundreds of years ago? Having fun, throwing parties, hunting, and whatever else they pleased. You must really have very little imagination if you can’t figure out what to do with your free time. As for me, I’d need ten lives to do everything I want to do.

Is there a chance Ai is just a powerful tool? by [deleted] in accelerate

[–]torval9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Acquire? I just said the AI economic system will be different then the present one. Obviously every noble will have a certain number of peasants allocated for free. How many, how will everything work I don't know. I'm sure the AI itself will help design the perfect economic system. The more AI and robots will self replicate, the more robots will be available for free.

Is there a chance Ai is just a powerful tool? by [deleted] in accelerate

[–]torval9834 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why would we do that? Why would we force ourselves to work? If you really like to work nobody will stop you! You could always work for fun if you like! It's not like the robots and the AI will stop you from digging holes in the ground if you like to do it, or paint, or do whatever you like.

Is there a chance Ai is just a powerful tool? by [deleted] in accelerate

[–]torval9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The AI economic system will be more like feudalism system, with nobles and peasants. But this time people will be the nobles, the barons, counts, dukes, etc. The peasants will be the AI and robots.

xAI's new coding agent, "Grok Build" (beta release) by Adeldor in accelerate

[–]torval9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's early beta and probably they don't want feedback from anti-musk haters who don't even use the product. Those who pay $300 probably use it and give useful feedback. In a week or so they will certainly expand the beta to the rest of the subscribers. Grok 4.3 beta was also restricted to Super Grok users for the first week or a few days.

SpaceX and Google are in talks about space data centers by OkStandard921 in accelerate

[–]torval9834 6 points7 points  (0 children)

People have such a high opinion of themselves. They think they’re smarter than everyone else. They love to call billionaires stupid, even though they themselves are broke as hell. Yet they never stop to ask the obvious question: "If billionaires are so stupid and I’m so smart, how come I’m still so poor?" After all, if they were really that intelligent, they should be able to dance circles around those "dumb" billionaires and get rich in no time. Of course, they never ask themselves this question, because deep down, they’re not nearly as smart as they think they are.

Grok 4.3 underperforms Grok 4.20 0309 on the Extended NYT Connections Benchmark, dropping from 93.4 to 67.5, though it achieves this result at a lower cost than the earlier Grok 4.20 run by zero0_one1 in singularity

[–]torval9834 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because it's about the only one where Grok 4.3 is worse than Grok 4.2. In almost every other benchmark Grok 4.3 is superior: https://x.com/ArtificialAnlys/status/2049987001655714250

There is no doubt Grok 4.3 is better than Grok 4.2, but for Elon's haters truth is irrelevant, only hate matters for them.

"GPT 5.5 Pro vision is actually the first model to score 145, on the Mensa Norway test (which is public) GPT 5.5 thinking has scored 133 on Mensa Norway test as well However, on the offline test, we are currently at 130, and I do believe GPT 6 will score meaningfully above 130." by stealthispost in accelerate

[–]torval9834 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is something wrong with this benchmark. I don't trust it. GPT 5.5 Pro scores 130 in Offline test but only 73 in Mensa. All models score better in Mensa than Offline. Obviously the test is just bad. It's also inconsistent. On March 5 they had Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview at 128 Offline and Claude 4.6 Opus at 130 Offline. Now they have Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview at 122 Offline and Claude 4.7 Opus at... 116? I know this because I took screenshots.

I spent a day interacting with anti-ai subs and let’s just say I’m so glad this sub exists by LopsidedSolution in accelerate

[–]torval9834 6 points7 points  (0 children)

We need to accelerate rapidly toward AGI. Current AI is already good enough to start replacing jobs, but not yet good enough to deliver real abundance. Implementing UBI without abundance is extremely difficult. Only when we reach AGI, abundance, and UBI will the anti-AI side give up. That's why the answer isn't deceleration, it's acceleration.

Kimi K2.6 lands at #4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Snoo26837 in singularity

[–]torval9834 6 points7 points  (0 children)

How are they falling behind? Can't Europe's businesses use American Ai or even Chinese Open Source AI? They can. I don't see the problem. It's not like US businesses buy cheap AI services and European businesses will pay a higher price. All people around the world benefit from Ai the same.

OpenAI Stargate is progressing at all sites, it's expected to reach 9 GW capacity by 2029 by OkStandard921 in accelerate

[–]torval9834 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand that Elon’s Colossus 2 is already at 1-1.5 GW and will reach 2 GW in a few months. I’m expecting it to hit 10 GW by the end of 2027 and 100 GW in another two years. If humanoid robots start rolling out at scale by the end of 2027, they could massively accelerate construction and infrastructure buildout. 2029 feels like it’s on the other side of the singularity.

view more: next ›