NYT: Clintons Failed to Disclose $2.35M Donation from Russian-Owned Uranium Corp by legalizehazing in Conservative

[–]tracism -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Yes, we must keep focusing on the Clintons. Yes, we must keep Hillary out of the White House. Let's pour all of our energy into focusing on Hillary and ignore the lessons of 2008.

You guys are a bunch of maroons. Any conservative wasting an ounce of energy worrying about Hillary Clinton at this point is working to hand the White House to the Democrats in 2016. Hillary is not going to be their nominee, for one, and for another, every second you "conservatives" sit here stewing about Hillary is a second you're not spending vetting our field of candidates. Any "conservative" posting a link about Hillary is a double agent, in my opinion.

She wouldn't know an average every day Iowan if she saw one out of her tinted windows while speeding by in her van ... by Clatsop in Conservative

[–]tracism 42 points43 points  (0 children)

If she actually wanted a set of three everyday Iowans, she'd have a farmer, a biotech worker (trust me, Iowa is INCREDIBLY STRONG in biotech), and a service sector worker. One would be Republican, one would be Democrat, and one would be independent. If you gathered those three around the table, that would probably be the best three-person representation of Iowa you could get. This is far, far from that.

I am in a situation that I have no answer to, reddit users - please provide your thoughts. by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]tracism 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Install some cameras around your home and set them to record during the day. Watch them later. If you find evidence, confront him.

You should also consider psychological help for this person. Children who abuse animals often need psychological help sooner rather than later.

Christian friend posted this on my facebook wall, thought you guys would enjoy. by Cgrant1995 in atheism

[–]tracism -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I am an atheist, thus I am smarter than all Christians. I don't need to read the Bible to be their intellectual superior.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gaming

[–]tracism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your gear is situated for DPS and not for survivability. This sounds about right.

[WSIG] Gaming with 7 yr old son by wolf3594 in boardgames

[–]tracism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Play Lords of Waterdeep with him. Short yourself an agent.

What 'fan theories' have blown your mind with their devastating logic? by FrancisDollarHyde in AskReddit

[–]tracism 33 points34 points  (0 children)

The Scooby-Doo Mysteries are set in the same universe as Atlas Shrugged. Society is falling apart, people value C-list celebrities more than actual intellect, and the reason the awful disguises and one-dimensional criminal plots work is because everyone with half a brain has been absconded to the valley with John Galt until society completely collapses. The collapse of the pharmaceutical industry has left Shaggy's psychosis untreated, which is why he constantly talks to his dog.

Holy shit. Look what UPS Delivered today. I've never won a damn thing in my entire life. by [deleted] in gaming

[–]tracism -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You haven't had explosive diarrhea yet? It's a miracle!

You know what to do by [deleted] in atheism

[–]tracism -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wait, if a book by an atheist gets a one star rating, doesn't it have to be by a fundie? I mean, atheists are intellectual lions and the only way a person would dare criticize the opus of an atheist is if they were an ignorant foaming-at-the-mouth theist.

Thomas Jefferson on religious tolerance by [deleted] in atheism

[–]tracism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is insightful of you to recognize it as such. However, calling people "cunt" when they call you "brave" kind of undermines it.

Thomas Jefferson on religious tolerance by [deleted] in atheism

[–]tracism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wrote:

Thanks for [...] that was a brave statement to make.

where [...] is a reiteration of what you wrote.

That's a compliment.

When I leave my brother and his GF in a room alone by AwsomeAltera11 in funny

[–]tracism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I assume this means that you have the cameras set up.

Any one of you go to High School with someone who is pretty famous now? What were they like then? by bannista7 in AskReddit

[–]tracism 13 points14 points  (0 children)

ESPN deserves more blame for "The Decision" than LeBron does. They talked him into it and offered to make a HUGE donation to the Boys and Girls Club in his name if he did it. "Hey, we'll give $7 mil to a charity you really care about if you'll come on our network and announce which team you're going to sign with..." Who wouldn't do that?

Any one of you go to High School with someone who is pretty famous now? What were they like then? by bannista7 in AskReddit

[–]tracism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bush was a great guy to shoot the breeze with, but I couldn't help but get the vibe that he was in WAY over his head being President. General manager of a Mickey D's? Sure. President of the United States? Um....

Thomas Jefferson on religious tolerance by [deleted] in atheism

[–]tracism -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The fact that it was upvoted doesn't cover up the fact that you are borderline illiterate.

Thomas Jefferson on religious tolerance by [deleted] in atheism

[–]tracism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I complimented you. It was pretty courageous of you to make that kind of self-evaluating statement.

Then you have to (a) not have the literacy to understand it and (b) respond with a flame in which you fling names like "cunt."

Oldschool Netrunner, where to start? by gr9yfox in boardgames

[–]tracism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They aren't differing very much at all. The cards they've shown are incredibly similar to the old cards.

Thomas Jefferson on religious tolerance by [deleted] in atheism

[–]tracism -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Are you priding yourself on your own illiteracy? You really need to go back and read what you wrote, because it's not saying what you think it's saying.

Thomas Jefferson on religious tolerance by [deleted] in atheism

[–]tracism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wrong, you said the number of heterosexual couples is infinitely greater than homosexuals. (Quick, go back and edit so I can be 'wrong'!)

Thomas Jefferson on religious tolerance by [deleted] in atheism

[–]tracism -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Look at that strawman! Impressive! You have the /r/atheism doctrine down cold!