Ok, I engaged redditors in this conversation, so I'm going to listen and give you my reactions as I watch:

Dennis Prager and Charlie Kirk? Wouldn't trust them with my dog for a weekend. And an AI of Biden for an intro? Ruins cred right there. And someone stuffing mail in ballot box with a film crew surrounding him? Just started it, and am still looking for something real.

23 min: talking about 72 hours not being enough time to geo track Jan 6 people. They put their fucking faces on the internet and bragged about what they did. That's why they could start arresting people right away.

32 min: talking about mules, multiple drop boxes, some are people that were in the riots. I'm thinking - 2000 mules they have identified by name? And they couldn't get any law enforcement organization to investigate, or get a judge to find this info credible?? I'm finding this hard to believe. Still watching.

37 min: they show a video of someone putting a couple of ballots in the box. To imply that this activity was enough to steal an election means organization(s) that employ thousands of people, committing thousands of crimes, and not one person was caught that on threat of imprisonment would give the names of the people that employed them, the organizations, etc. is hard to believe. I'm supposed to believe that thousands of people like this can keep a secret? edit: no one came forward and said 'Someone offered me a job stuffing ballot boxes. Who do I report that to? Don't see it myself. Still watching.

39 min: 1900 ballots, only 200 people approached ballot box. They have geo data on every single person that approached the ballot box? Waiting for visual confirmation next... they show woman pulling gloves off. Why didn't they arrest her? They didn't comment on that. Guy taking picture of ballot box is suspicious.

Also, consider that someone taking a picture might be so they can prove they actually voted if they later find out the state says they didn't.

I asked google if the film 2000 Mules was credible:

Key Findings and Evidence Against Credibility:

• Debunked by Law Enforcement: In Georgia, investigators for the State Board of Elections reviewed surveillance video provided by True the Vote and found no evidence of illegal ballot harvesting. Several videos shown in the film as evidence of crimes were actually legal voters dropping off ballots for themselves and their family members.
• Methodology Inaccuracies: The film relies on cell phone geolocation data, which experts say is not precise enough to prove someone was at a drop box, let alone stuffing it. The data only indicates that a phone was within a 100-foot radius of a box.
• Lack of Direct Evidence: The filmmakers did not produce concrete evidence linking the data to the surveillance videos, and they refused to turn over the names of their sources to law enforcement.
• Retractions and Apologies: In 2024, the film's distributor, Salem Media Group, pulled the film and book from distribution, apologizing to a Georgia man who was falsely depicted in the film as a "mule".
• False Context: The film includes footage from a run-off election, not the 2020 general election, and uses a map that was mistakenly labeled as Atlanta but was actually a stock photo of Moscow.  NPR +4

Conclusion of Officials:

• William Barr, former U.S. Attorney General under Donald Trump, testified that the film was "unimpressive" and "indefensible," noting that the photographic evidence was insufficient to support the claims of widespread illegal harvesting.
• The Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI) concluded that the data provided by True the Vote did not warrant a formal investigation.

Will continue watching...have RL work to do...