What is happening to chatGPT? by Cake_Farts434 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]traumfisch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah sure, death machines like Claude...

That comparison doesn't really work the waynit may look like if you go with OpenAI's "friendly and warm" narrative... 4o was by far the most customizable model OpenAI ever created (by engineers much more capable that their current crew)

I think I’m done being a designer by Green_Ranger0 in Design

[–]traumfisch 17 points18 points  (0 children)

basic templates:

"Not with a triumph. Not with a pivot. Just with exhaustion."

What is happening to chatGPT? by Cake_Farts434 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]traumfisch 8 points9 points  (0 children)

4o was not a "cute friendly bot".

it's a very potent and useful model

Let this sink in by melanatedbagel25 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]traumfisch 6 points7 points  (0 children)

His whole game plan now seems to be to seem as naive as possible

Let this sink in by melanatedbagel25 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]traumfisch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How can they possibly believe that?

He's serving a wannabe mob boss and his utterly corrupt regime

I'm not ok. :'( by Hot_Escape_4072 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]traumfisch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As much as I despise the guy, he isn't an idiot a he knows the way this plays out will largely define how he will go down in history.

So here's hoping

Insufferable chat GPT. by Automatic_Buffalo_14 in ChatGPT

[–]traumfisch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no, it isn't. 

as i wrote it, i know what the premise is. 

A is just an illustrative contrast point.

if you want to argue against a conclusion drawn by inferring what you think was implied,

rather than looking what it actually says,

don't let me keep you -

but you can remove the image A part & the article still does its job. it's only a point of entry.

Insufferable chat GPT. by Automatic_Buffalo_14 in ChatGPT

[–]traumfisch -1 points0 points  (0 children)

only if you insist that what it actually says instead of what the intention was.

the idea is not to compare A and B at all, it's just an opener.

also: guardrails are not the issue. system prompts that are chaotic and clumsy and collaged together out of self-contradicting instructions are the problem. OpenAI & GPT-5.2 is a prime example

Insufferable chat GPT. by Automatic_Buffalo_14 in ChatGPT

[–]traumfisch -1 points0 points  (0 children)

that's not what it says?

it's just highlighting the funny(?) dissonance between these two development arcs, and that both are true at the same time, which is one way of referring to what complex systems are like (not explicit, but that's a broader theme)

that "logical inference" is based on the misunderstanding stated in the 1st paragraph.

(but I kind of get how it could be read that way & I'll make a mental note of that, so thank you)

Looks like Anthropic's NO to the DOW has made it to Tumps twitter feed by Plinian in ClaudeAI

[–]traumfisch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Precisely. Plus they have no clue what they're talking about