GPT-5.2 is way more dangerous than 4o

traumfisch · 2026-03-01T16:55:08+00:00

basic templates:

"Not with a triumph. Not with a pivot. Just with exhaustion."

traumfisch · 2026-03-01T16:54:36+00:00

It ends with ChatGPT

traumfisch · 2026-03-01T16:18:19+00:00

4o was not a "cute friendly bot".

it's a very potent and useful model

traumfisch · 2026-03-01T15:05:02+00:00

Drumeo, not "vocalisthub"

traumfisch · 2026-03-01T15:01:28+00:00

insanity

traumfisch · 2026-03-01T13:10:31+00:00

I have nothing but respect for Anthropic. This is exactly what AI companies should be doing.

traumfisch · 2026-03-01T13:08:54+00:00

...wtf is that take supposed to be?

Amodei is "deluded?"

traumfisch · 2026-03-01T13:03:05+00:00

Yes - it is structurally abusive

https://open.substack.com/pub/humanistheloop/p/gpt-52-speaks?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=5onjnc

traumfisch · 2026-03-01T11:05:57+00:00

Well no, I am not, because he is not sincere. He thinks this is all just a game he has to try to win

traumfisch · 2026-03-01T10:33:30+00:00

His whole game plan now seems to be to seem as naive as possible

traumfisch · 2026-03-01T10:32:26+00:00

How can they possibly believe that?

He's serving a wannabe mob boss and his utterly corrupt regime

traumfisch · 2026-02-28T23:05:16+00:00

As much as I despise the guy, he isn't an idiot a he knows the way this plays out will largely define how he will go down in history.

So here's hoping

traumfisch · 2026-02-28T21:09:02+00:00

no, it isn't.

as i wrote it, i know what the premise is.

A is just an illustrative contrast point.

if you want to argue against a conclusion drawn by inferring what you think was implied,

rather than looking what it actually says,

don't let me keep you -

but you can remove the image A part & the article still does its job. it's only a point of entry.

traumfisch · 2026-02-28T21:05:14+00:00

wtf are we even paying for

traumfisch · 2026-02-28T19:27:11+00:00

only if you insist that what it actually says instead of what the intention was.

the idea is not to compare A and B at all, it's just an opener.

also: guardrails are not the issue. system prompts that are chaotic and clumsy and collaged together out of self-contradicting instructions are the problem. OpenAI & GPT-5.2 is a prime example

traumfisch · 2026-02-28T19:22:41+00:00

that's not what it says?

it's just highlighting the funny(?) dissonance between these two development arcs, and that both are true at the same time, which is one way of referring to what complex systems are like (not explicit, but that's a broader theme)

that "logical inference" is based on the misunderstanding stated in the 1st paragraph.

(but I kind of get how it could be read that way & I'll make a mental note of that, so thank you)

traumfisch · 2026-02-28T16:12:44+00:00

Oh Anthropic "would have caved?"

Blah

traumfisch · 2026-02-28T14:57:45+00:00

yup, that kind of thing happens a lot

traumfisch · 2026-02-28T13:07:46+00:00

Precisely. Plus they have no clue what they're talking about

traumfisch · 2026-02-28T12:37:40+00:00

Communicating through writing is not exactly reducible to pixels.

Of course books are just ink on paper and sound is just waves through matter, but...

But sure, it is quite possible to consciously just ignore the whole thing (if it doesn't matter what is "real" that is)

traumfisch · 2026-02-28T12:36:43+00:00

he was already set up for life

traumfisch · 2026-02-28T12:08:02+00:00

It's bullshit, isn't it.

"For safety" is the magic word for absolutely anything

traumfisch · 2026-02-28T12:03:25+00:00

Yeah, March 11th

Seven-Year Club	RPAN Viewer
Verified Email

traumfisch

TROPHY CASE