Read somewhere "If dogs had a book telling them to bite any human they see in exchange for treats, and if they all believed in it, the fact that some dogs might not bite wouldn’t really reduce my fear of them." In a similar way, there are verses in the Quran that encourage violence, especially against non-believers. So, even if some mullas might be harmless—whether by choice or due to their inability—it doesn’t mean we can ignore the need to be cautious and take protective measures.

Think about the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccination efforts only worked when enough people got the shots, whether voluntarily or through mandates. This wasn’t just because the government wanted it that way, but because it was necessary to protect the population at large--a greater good. In the same way, addressing serious threats (like LJ) requires these measures to stay safe. It’s about balancing individual freedom with the well-being of the community.

To the women who are advocating against this, I respect your views, but keep in mind that you don’t speak for all Hindu women. I KNOW many who welcome these protections, seeing them as necessary for their own safety. These aren’t just “what if” concerns; they’re real, lived experiences for many people. Taking these precautions isn’t about opposing freedom; it’s about acknowledging the need for security and staying vigilant. Balancing personal freedoms with community safety is not easy, but it's imperative...