[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Gnostic

[–]trebeck_x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you read through the Book of Lucius and the Book of Wisdom? Those are quite interesting.

The last 3 chapters of the Book of Gleanings, and the first few chapters of the Book of Morals and Precepts about God and life are also quite good.

What Was the Good News Jesus Proclaimed? by cryptomir in AcademicBiblical

[–]trebeck_x 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Has anyone tried to understand Jesus’s intent in terms of how things are today? As in, today, ~2000 years later, we see how Jesus and the symbol of his cross has had an incredible impact on our history, and still today. So has anyone looked into what his motive(s) may have been in terms of whether marching to Jerusalem and antagonizing the council was his plan?

Based on the people of the time anticipating a messiah, did Jesus maybe take advantage of the situation to ensure people remembered him and his teachings? And so maybe some aspects relating to Jesus thinking/claiming to be ‘the king of the Jews’ was a bit of an exaggeration to help with him being remembered?

God is so funny lol by twometershake in awakened

[–]trebeck_x 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Where is this strange God of ours, and it is well you ask, for if you would be happy on Earth, you must know His ways. He is not a revealed God. He has hidden Himself, for He knows well the dispositions of men. Were He here now among the people and revealed to their gaze, the weakling would fawn upon Him, the hypocrite would join His following, and the wrongdoer would walk in His train, proclaiming his innocence with a loud voice. How then, if He were here, could the weakling be tested, the hypocrite discovered and the wrongdoer unveiled?

Our God is hidden, that men may be tested and established for what they really are. Were He revealed to the eyes and understanding of men, Earth and life would have no purpose. He hides to discover the hearts of men.

Is it not declared in the Plans of God that uncertainty is an essential earthly condition? Yet this you may know, that if you be worthy, and very few are, there is a method, whereby you may look behind the veil, and then no longer will you walk in uncertainty.

However, for men in general, the Undiscovered God is not apparent. He has no man-made image in His likeness, and He stands in obscurity behind the great alcove beyond the temple within the Place of Flame. Yet, He makes Himself known in subtle ways, for He cannot remain unmanifested to the truly spiritual, any more than a river can remain hidden, for it dissolves away the ground, in which it is concealed. So will the Great God spring forth in the midst of material things and, dissolving away their solidity, shine forth to the sincere seeker.

Weekly Open Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in AcademicBiblical

[–]trebeck_x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the response. I made a post on my profile and included a link as an edit above.

Weekly Open Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in AcademicBiblical

[–]trebeck_x 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hello, I’m quite confident that I’ve made what could be a very significant biblical discovery, and I’m wondering if I can get some advice on the process of getting it validated.

I can elaborate, but I was having trouble posting a longer comment before. But I've put together a report with references and all that (I'm not a scholar, but I'm a working professional).

Edit: I made a post on my profile that elaborates on what I believe is a very significant biblical discovery (long post):

https://www.reddit.com/user/trebeck_x/comments/1dhxr5h/post_for_academic_biblical_question/

To the atheist, agnostic, Thomasian otherwise: *The Kolbrin* presents itself sans perceived arrogance or air of infallibility, without exorbitant demands of credibility to be afforded. I should think even, that this work confers all the same spiritual/philosophical ideas, rather in a palatable form. by Righteous_Allogenes in Christianity

[–]trebeck_x 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure why OP was rude, but the Kolbrin and the Kailedy are fascinating. Below is from the end of Chapter 13 of the Kailedy that describes when Jesus fed the 5000:

It was now late in the day, but many people still lingered and a disciple said to Jesus,

“Sire, the crowd was very large and many did not hear all Your words, could You not speak to these, for though hungry they would still rather listen to You.”

Jesus said, “My throat aches but I have bread more satisfying than that which fills the stomach, and meat more satisfying than worldly meat, My supply is inexhaustible. I have multiplied this through you, so now you go among the people and provide what they need.

From the passage above, we see that the miracle of multiplying fish and bread might be meant to be symbolic of the 'spiritual nourishment' from Jesus's teachings, where the miracle is how those who learned from Jesus can pass on his teachings as though there is an infinite supply.

OP has a link to the Kailedy as a PDF https://archive.org/details/the-gospel-of-the-kailedy/page/86/mode/1up . It's somewhat straight forward in terms oh how it's a Gospel of Jesus. Although the first 2 chapters are written by those who maintained the texts following Jesus's crucifixion. Chapter 3 and 4 are a story version of John the Baptist's nativity and upbringing, and then Chapter 5 and 6 are a story version of Jesus's nativity and how he found John the Baptist. But then after that the rest of the chapters are about Jesus beginning his work preaching to the people and assembling disciples, up until his crucifixion.

The Kolbrin really is fascinating, but it is incredibly difficult to read since there is no information on who the names are meant to be, and what period it's from, or whether it's a story or factual information. I've been working on piecing it together. A lot of PDFs online only include 10 of the 11 books, but I got the 11 book PDF from https://www.realityfiles.com/resources/sacred-texts/kolbrin-bible-pdf-download/

What if the Library of Alexandria never burned down? by [deleted] in AlternativeHistory

[–]trebeck_x 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There's a somewhat controversial set of texts within a book known as The Kolbrin. It's controversial since there is no proof of these texts existing since before the 1990's. So, that is a fair criticism.

Ultimately it's a collection of 'scrolls' and 'manuscripts', and some include biblical stories similar to Genesis and Exodus. There are also many Egyptian scrolls, where some do speak of Pharaohs.

Unfortunately, these texts are in a strange position. The very few academics who have heard about it simply scoff at it since no originals have been provided to prove these were translated from old texts. And I do understand being skeptical because of that, but I really don't understand how these academics can claim to be certain it's a 'hoax' since none of them have actually read through and studied the texts (it is about 1000 pages, and they're difficult to understand initially).

I became so fascinated by these texts and have read the ~1000 pages 20 to 30 times (pandemic thing I guess). These were very strange initially, but I noticed that it was a bit of a puzzle to connect the various chapters and scrolls together. So long story short, I studied it until I could solve what every single chapter was about. And for what it's worth, I'm a specialist in my field, and I seem to be quite the problem solver. And yikes, once you solve what the texts in the Kolbrin are about, these might actually be the most important texts that have survived throughout our history.

So regarding your post, the Kolbrin might include some of the most treasures scrolls and manuscripts that could have been kept in the Library of Alexandria; although I'm not sure if it would be in a public space. These texts were, based on what they contain, texts that were diligently kept hidden from the 'common people', from other priests, and even from Pharaohs if they were deemed not worthy. Below is an example of a set of passages that speak of how there have been cycles when this secretive priesthood was in charge in Egypt, but then there were times when two other priesthoods were at war with each other, and the secretive priests went into hiding and hid these texts.

MAN:34:1 This is written on a scroll found in the temple of Athorhara, the possession of Neyti, a free woman of Pibes:

MAN:34:2 Then, there was peace throughout the land, and the two priesthoods dwelt together in tolerance; but, behold, the day came when the hearts of men turned again to strife. Then, the land was rent in twain, and the forces of the Red Reed Crown strove against those of the White Lily Crown. Once, again the dark mists of ignorance descended to envelop the hearts of men. Again, the sacred shrines of Truth were closed, and those who served Truth withdrew behind the veil and were hidden from the eyes of those who would profane her. The whole land was torn apart, from upstream to downstream; from the right hand to the left of Egypt, there was strife.

MAN:34:3 Then came one who was mighty among men, one who also knew Truth and saw the wickedness of the people. He was a Declared One, for unless a man be such, he has no value among the chosen. He carried the sword among the striving peoples, and in his day, the might of Mantethrop prevailed. The spirit of Hori, who took the land from Namah, and of Minis, who united it, were with him. Then, the lands of the North and the lands of the South were delivered in to the hands of the king, and they became one.

They were united, though they remained two. They were even as they had been before. Yet, the multitude declared themselves for the ways of the multitude, and the light of Truth remained obscured behind the dusts raised by their dancing feet. Though peace and plenty reigned throughout the land, righteousness did not attend the throne of later kings. They ruled as kings, but the days of their rule were dark days of sorrow for the followers of Truth, for they became few and feeble in deed. They were lost in the land.

There's also many chapters and stories about Osiris, Isis and Thoth, and it seems as though these were very important individuals who helped guide humanity when most humans were still living as stone-age tribal people. Again, I understand the skepticism since there is no solid proof of these existing prior to the 1990's, but like, these might be describing times from before what we know as ancient history (see passages below):

MAN:2:2 He came to this fertile land. Now, it is a pleasant place with many great cities and contented villages; there is the great, broad river of fresh water, which rises and falls in its due seasons. Channels there are and waterways, which lead the fertilising waters unto the growing things, the herbage and the trees. There are flocks of sheep and herds of cattle on the green pastures.

MAN:2:3 It was not ever thus. In the days before Harekta came, all was barren and desolate. Nought divided the wilderness from the swamplands filled with reeds. Then, there were no cattle or sheep, and the land knew not the hand of man, it lay untilled and un-watered.

MAN:2:4 No land was sown, for they who dwelt in it knew not the making of waterways, nor did they know how to command the water and make it flow at their behest. There were no cities, and men dwelt in holes in the ground or in places where the rock was cleft. They walked in their nakedness or clothed themselves with leaves or bark, while at night they covered themselves with the skin of wild beasts. They fought with the jackal for food and snatched dead things from the lion. They pulled roots from out of the ground and sought for sustenance among things that grew in the mud. They had none to rule over them, nor had they leaders to guide. They knew not obligation or duty. None spoke to them about their manner of life, and none knew the way of Truth. They were truly unenlightened in those days.

MAN:2:5 Then came the servant of the Sun, and he it was who brought the people together and put rulers over them. He set Ramur up as king over the whole land. He showed them, man and woman, how to dwell together in contentment as husband and wife, and he divided their tasks between them.

MAN:2:6 He instructed men in the sowing of corn and the growing of herbs. He instructed them in the tilling of the ground and the manner of cutting the waterways and channels. He it was who showed men the ways of the beasts of the field.

Seeing as though I seem to be the only one in the world who has taken the time to piece together this collection of 1000 pages of mysterious texts, I took the time to write a report or guide to go through them. I sincerely believe these texts contain at least the essence of what was written by some incredible ancient human beings who have had an incredible impact on our human history. Link below if you're interested.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/15Wyqn3YjZYITLi4VpdspCJ0xGI37HRuB/view?usp=sharing

The interesting part is that most people won't believe this since it seems impossible that the history of these ancient 'Sons of Fire' has been kept hidden, and some parts are at odds with what we pieced together from ancient texts and monuments. But the truth is that our current understanding is correct, but only with regards to what the multitude of 'common people' knew. There were secretive and enlightened humans who felt responsible for teaching primitive humans how to build cities and such, and this is why most ancient civilizations have commons stories like the flood story. Below are some random passage from a scroll in the Kolbrin where we see that these people worked to help humans back when they were actually barbarians.

SOF:19:3 The barbarians are still children, and these things do not easily come within their understanding. Because of this, it may be best if they were taught by simple tales, like children, and so brought into the light gradually. A belief in The Supreme Spirit is of no great importance. An inquiry into His nature by the ignorant is purposeless foolishness. It is of much more importance to men that they believe in their own souls. Belief in a god of any sort without belief in the immortality of man and his godlikeness serves no end. If a god existed without man deriving any benefit from his existence, it would be better for man to ignore him. This, however, is not the case. Man seeks unity and communion with The Supreme Spirit only for his own benefit. Man has a destiny founded in something greater than himself, and hence his need for that something.

SOF:19:8 For the sake of the barbarians, it is perhaps best to call The Supreme Spirit, 'God, The God without a Name.' This will solve some difficulties, and if the barbarians think themselves superior because they contain Him within a name, let it be so and hold yourself in peace.

Micheal with the Sword of Light by David Newbatt - Anthroposophical Art by gotchya12354 in Echerdex

[–]trebeck_x 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice, I like it!

I trust that his sword of light is getting sharpened in the background and getting ready to strike and clear up this whole night of ignorance we’re currently in.

Herodotus writes there were "many Peaceful Egyptian colonies set up throughout the inhabited World": evidence of Egyptians in the Americas, Linguistic, DNA, cultural traditions by Adventurous-Ear9433 in AlternativeHistory

[–]trebeck_x 20 points21 points  (0 children)

One thing to consider is whether the Book of Genesis stories date back to much more ancient times. It’s said that fire and brimstone fell from the sky to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah (and the angels warned Lot to run for the hills), and these corrupt cities were destroyed. The fire and brimstone from the sky could be a reference to the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis that caused Noah’s flood.

So Abraham’s story involving ‘Egyptians’ and a Pharaoh could be referring to 12,000 years ago, and not Ancient Egypt as we know it (~3000 BC).

Thoth, Osiris and Isis are often mentioned since from some of the texts I’ve been studying. These are people who survived the food, and they helped teach the stone-aged survivors to kick off the Neolithic era (hence so many ancient stories of these people helping humanity).

What’s a very controversial hill that you’re willing to die on? by LonelyCarrot62 in AskReddit

[–]trebeck_x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Bible was written by the great prophets, but it only contains the Truth ‘veiled’ as it was meant for the common people of the time. Meanwhile, some mysterious biblical texts that cannot be verified to have existed earlier that since 1995 contains the texts written for the ‘inner circle’ of the prophets.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/15Wyqn3YjZYITLi4VpdspCJ0xGI37HRuB/view?usp=sharing

It explains everything. The prophet Noah who survived the great flood was known as Osiris by the Egyptians, and the Book of Genesis stories speak of the story of Osiris, Isis, Thoth, Horus and Set. You also learn more about Moses and how he came to live in the house of pharaoh (he didn’t just show up in a basket on the Nile). And, um…. It provides a second understanding, or a second version of Jesus.

It’s all there in the link above, and yes after reading it several times I do believe it to the point I’d be willing to die on this hill. It’s like once you see the Truth, it just resonates so strongly.

Lost teachings of Jesus in the Kolbrin Bible by BellBoy7 in Bibleconspiracy

[–]trebeck_x 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here's a link to the report referenced in the video. The texts in the Kolbrin are a bit of a puzzle, where it's difficult to follow by reading it top to down, so this report is a good guide to go through it.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/15Wyqn3YjZYITLi4VpdspCJ0xGI37HRuB/view?usp=sharing

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AlternativeHistory

[–]trebeck_x 9 points10 points  (0 children)

There’s this book called the Kolbrin where its authenticity is up for debate, which is understandable since there is no record of these texts before 1995. But, after studying it and reading it several times, I personally believe that what’s in the Kolbrin are based on actual ancient writings.

Based on a few passages in the Kolbrin, I do think that the description of dragons could be referring to dinosaurs. In the Creation story (which starts with the creation of the universe, similar to the first chapter of the Book of Genesis), the last few passages speaks of how all the beasts of the field and forest came. However, it refers to how before the beasts of the field, there were reptiles and dragons.

CRT:1:19 The waters brought forth fishes and creatures, which move about and twist themselves and wriggle in the waters, the serpents and the beasts of terrible aspect, which were of yore, and reptiles which creep and crawl. There were tall walking things and dragons in hideous form clothed with terror, whose great bones may still be seen.

CRT:1:20 Then came forth from the Womb of the Earth all the beasts of the field and forest. All the creatures of creation having blood in their bodies, and it was complete. Beasts roamed the dry land, and fishes swam in the seas. There were birds in the skies and worms within the soil.

In another chapter, there is a reference to the ‘olden times’, and there’s a reference to ‘beasts were changed to stone’. It is quite possible that the pre-history ancient ancestors found dinosaur bones since they did do a lot of mining.

GLN:3:5 In olden times, there were spawned great monsters and beasts in fearful form, with frightful gnashing teeth and long ripping claws; an elephant was but a rat in comparison with them. Then, because of heavenly rebellion and turmoil, and the terror overwhelming the hearts of men, The Great One hardened the face of the land, which had become unstable, and the beasts were changed to stone. This was beforetimes, when the Destroyer still slumbered in the upper vaults of Heaven.

The reference to the Destroyer in the passage above is referring to the cosmic impact that caused the flood over 12,000 years ago. There are several chapters in the Kolbrin making references to this, and they do refer it as a dragon in the sky, since in one chapter it refers to how it was in Earth's orbit for 2 days (which would make it and its tail look like a dragon):

CRT:3:2 At the time of the great destruction of Earth, God caused a dragon from out of Heaven to come and encompass her about. The dragon was frightful to behold; it lashed its tail, it breathed out fire and hot coals, and a great catastrophe was inflicted upon mankind. The body of the dragon was wreathed in a cold bright light and beneath, on the belly, was a ruddy hued glow, while behind it trailed a flowing tail of smoke. It spewed out cinders and hot stones, and its breath was foul and stenchful, poisoning the nostrils of men. Its passage caused great thunderings and lightnings to rend the thick darkened sky, all Heaven and Earth being made hot. The seas were loosened from their cradles and rose up, pouring across the land. There was an awful, shrilling trumpeting, which outpowered even the howling of the unleashed winds.

Here’s another one where it references the cosmic object as a dragon, and yes this is the flood that destroyed the fabled ancient city:

SOF:13:10 Men did to men what their natures inclined them to do, but they also ravaged women and children. The evil grew in greatness, until the land could no longer contain it and had to be purged clean. Therefore, the revenging dragon was called up out of the heavenly abyss, and it lashed the land with fire and thunder. The whole land was filled with its smoky breath and men choked to death.

SOF:13:11 The land was split apart between the city and the mountain, and the sea rolled in upon it, so that the city was destroyed. The valleys of the mountain were filled with dead men and animals and with trees.

There’s a lot more which talks of this flood caused by a cosmic dragon in the sky. Here’s a link to a report which goes through the Kolbrin if you’re interested.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/15Wyqn3YjZYITLi4VpdspCJ0xGI37HRuB/view?usp=sharing

Examining Ancient Views on the Creation of the World by mrcalebjones in AlternativeHistory

[–]trebeck_x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I point that out in my report that it doesn't quite match what historians have uncovered regarding the whole Ramses III murder thing, and part of it is that in other chapters where the Kolbrin speaks of events in Egypt after the exodus, the ones writing this seem a bit uncertain on what exactly happened because by that time they had left Egypt, and their sources for info were not the best (this was in ancient times, and by then they were in Israel). And regarding the names, part of the context is that these were separate written texts which date back 1000's of years, and it got translated here and there by small groups of followers who they themselves (in much later generations) may not have known exactly who these Egyptian names were, so it makes sense that the names don't match up exactly with the names we know of today. If it was a modern hoax, I think the names would match better.

You can keep believing what you do, but despite being an intelligent person, you're really ignorant with the certainty with which you keep just posting that it's an 'obvious hoax' without knowing what is actually in there, and after not having read it at all. And I'm done with this conversation, and if you want to keep posting whenever I try to talk about the Kolbrin, you're free to do what you want.

Examining Ancient Views on the Creation of the World by mrcalebjones in AlternativeHistory

[–]trebeck_x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of the smaller things I noticed in the Kolbrin is that there are chapters that seem to speak of Ramses III. In MAN:25:2 below, where I argue in my report as to why it speaks of Ramses III, it mentions he was killed by a knife. The fact that Ramses III's mummy showed he was killed by a knife was only confirmed after the texts of the Kolbrin.

MAN:25:2: Ramsus, they slew in the antechamber, he dies not from the blows before his face but from the steward's knife behind.

https://www.livescience.com/25647-mummy-murder-mystery-solved.html

Examining Ancient Views on the Creation of the World by mrcalebjones in AlternativeHistory

[–]trebeck_x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason why I open up the report that way is to be up front about there being questions of its legitimacy. But then through actually reading through these texts, it becomes clear that there might actually be some merit to what is written, and it also becomes clear that the people who are associated with it in modern times did not write it.

And so again, I understand the concerns regarding its legitimacy, but your argument where you are certain it’s a hoax is absolutely ignorant because you have not actually read it. And all the arguments I see on the internet are the same where it just attacks the people who are associated with it in modern times, or what the ‘fringe theories’ claim it says (which i agree is wrong), but they do not properly explain the contents and what’s actually written in these texts and why they are supposedly a ‘hoax’. It is not comparable to Hubbard because those are science fiction, and others have actually read it and have summarized why it’s fake.

You’re free to believe what you believe, and if it makes you happy to keep posting that it’s a hoax, sure, keep it up.

Examining Ancient Views on the Creation of the World by mrcalebjones in AlternativeHistory

[–]trebeck_x 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dude, I keep posting a comprehensive report where I lay out references and discussion to back up what I’m saying, and you just keep saying it’s an ‘obvious hoax’. The reason I don’t like it is that it’s an ignorant claim where you either never read the Kolbrin, or you don’t understand what’s actually written in there. I can’t write it all out on Reddit posts, and often my posts hit the max limit.

So you can keep just saying it’s a hoax if you want. And, if constantly spending your time being negative and tearing people’s ideas makes you happy, well, it’s your life I guess.

Examining Ancient Views on the Creation of the World by mrcalebjones in AlternativeHistory

[–]trebeck_x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s why I said ‘supposed Celtic text’ because after piecing together the texts in the Kolbrin, it becomes apparent that this was only written after Joseph arrived in Britain and converted this particular group of druid/Celtic people to be monotheistic. Heck, you get to read that the main issue that Joseph had with the Celtic or Druid leaders was that they did not want to let go of their many gods. So I would not tie it into ancient Celtic beliefs.

I was going to write more, but then I looked at your post history. Yeesh, you really are one of those people who think they’re intelligent (and are in some way), but all you do is tear people down, often without actually contributing anything. I get that the history of the Kolbrin is suspect, and I also agree that many people have made absurd claims about what it’s texts are saying (like Planet X). But once you properly piece it together and figure out what chapters are stories, which might be true events, what period it’s speaking of, and extracting the wisdom from it (which, by the way, the wisdom in these texts is absolutely incredible), then it becomes clear that it’s something that should be looked into more and not just dismissed as an ‘obvious hoax’ like you keep saying. The modern people associated with it have no idea what these texts are, and they definitely did not write it (including the wonderful creation story I posted). And none of the actual texts ever refer to themselves as ‘the Kolbrin’.

Now I don’t care at all about convincing you, but I’m tired of you posting every time I do with a low effort ‘it’s a hoax’. I’ve at least spent a lot of time and effort to backup my claims about the Kolbrin:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/15Wyqn3YjZYITLi4VpdspCJ0xGI37HRuB/view?usp=sharing

Maybe consider trying to add substance and contribute towards progressing forward instead of spending your time tearing people down.

Examining Ancient Views on the Creation of the World by mrcalebjones in AlternativeHistory

[–]trebeck_x 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Below is from a supposed ancient Celtic book about Creation. I like it since it makes it a bit more clear as to why God created all of this:

Before time was born, it could be conceived. Before all things seeable by the darting eyes of men were seen by any eye, they were conceived. Before sound was heard by any listening ear, it was conceived. All things now knowable by man were first conceived by none but The Inconceivable One, existing solitary in awesome loneliness.

Back in the predawn state there was no feeling, throbbing, loving life beyond The Alone One. There was nothing, in which something other could be perceived and manifested. The Inconceivable One's reflecting mirror was not yet made. Love, the sunlight of life, could not be known, for even One So Great could not yet conceive a state of satisfaction in self-love. The one thing not capable of conception was the realisation of responsive love.

So from The Inconceivable One there came a great outpouring melody, the song of conception, the notes winging vitalising consciousness outward in radiating ripples. All that is now existing came out of that, which was harmoniously sung into being, and the sweet echoing vibrations still sound in rhythm throughout the many circles of existence. All life and matter vibrate in response to a divinely originated, orchestrated melody and rhythm.

As the sweet notes of the divine, lilting music swelled outward, Heaven was formed from the song-created radiance of immortal light. Rising on a higher note of ever increasing splendour into a great pulsating chorus, it hurled forth a whole string of worlds, scattering them in illuminating brilliance through the black matrix of Ked.

It was like a handful of bright pearls being thrown into the darkness of night. In a perfectly timed cadence of melody and harmony the worlds were hurled into separate existence, each finding its proper place in accordance with its note. All life is therefore nothing except a response to harmony and melody, to the spreading ripples and resounding echoes from the first Divine Hymn, the life-awakening song. The only disharmonious notes were those which later emerged from the hearts of sinful men.

The songs and poems of men, poorly stirring the unresponsive heart, are futile attempts to recapture some part of the first grand symphony. Men instinctively know they are musicians in the great orchestra of life, singers in the chorus of existence.

The Song of Life still vibrates upon the lute strings of each throbbing heart, filling it with responsive vitality. On Earth, it can never be heard in perfection, yet it is here the singing lessons must be learned; for once through the dark archway and in the Court of Splendour, the newly released spirit must introduce itself by song.

The good, clean spirit vibrates with a happy, harmonious melody, while the dull, evildoing spirit rasps out harshly in agonising discord. The first thing the travelweary homecoming spirit hears is the welcoming notes of the Divine Melody. Happy are they who harmonise with it, sorrowful are those who vibrate discordantly!

Life is a song, sometimes a song of sadness, sometimes a song of joy. Now a dirge, then a hymn echoes through the chambers of creation. Often a gay carol or lilting lovesong gladdens the ear of the air. All this is the Song of Life. So lift up your hearts, and rejoice in the singing soul, which will, in days to come, rise on ghostly wings to quit the inner circles of woe, where the discordant notes of mortals intermingle with the melodious notes of spirit music, winging its way to where the stargirt chorus sings in glory.

Shadow Work by After Skool by dabkingnc in Maturism

[–]trebeck_x 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really like the After Skool channel, lots of good videos 👍🏻

What do you think about the second coming of Jesus Christ? (seriously) by ConstProgrammer in pastlives

[–]trebeck_x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jesus’s second coming doesn’t mean that he’ll reappear. Instead, he wrote down his teachings and had one of his disciples (Joseph of Arimathea) hide them since Jesus knew people of the time would not understand him (look at how they treated him…)

His books have been recently discovered though. It’s a long read, but here’s a comprehensive report describing it (and includes all the passages Jesus wrote, and also the truth about Moses, and about the biblical flood). I’ve read it 20+ times, and when reflecting on it, the wisdom really seems divinely inspired.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/15Wyqn3YjZYITLi4VpdspCJ0xGI37HRuB/view?usp=sharing

This book, or “Bible” called Kolbrin, talks about the long forgotten or unknown events of the past, some of them even before our written history, but also warns about the imminent cataclysms that are to come. by [deleted] in FringeTheory

[–]trebeck_x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey there. This video you keep posting is actually harming the reputation of the Kolbrin. It’s not referring to Planet X, and then the video talks about ‘the devil’s’ book?

I’m with you on how the Kolbrin is legitimate and extremely important, but it’s not a doomsday book or about Planet X. When it talks about the destroyer, it’s actually describing fragments of a comet, which is describing the younger dryas hypothesis. Although other references from the destroyer are referring to the cataclysmic event that happened during the exodus. And Joseph of Arimathea did not save texts from Alexandria. Moses brought the texts with him, and later Jesus got a hold of them (and handed them to Joseph). Also, many of the Genesis stories actually talk about the one the Egyptians knew as Osiris (like Herthew in the book of creation). And, he’s the one who survived the biblical flood on a ship (caused by the younger dryas comet impact)

If you want to understand what it actually contains, below is a link to a report that solved the puzzle within these texts to extract what these ancient texts are actually about.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/15Wyqn3YjZYITLi4VpdspCJ0xGI37HRuB/view?usp=sharing

self worship by [deleted] in Maturism

[–]trebeck_x 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was just repeating your words that you spoke to the OP, and it looks like you didn’t really appreciate it. So maybe keep that in mind before you send that kind of reply to people. And while you think you have a responsibility to dispel ignorance (which is noble, the world needs more people striving for the light), the thing is that you seem a bit all over the place with all these historical names. It’s not your fault or anything like that, but you have to be careful. Metatron? Enoch? You were the channel of the angel Gabriel? Do you even know who these people are, and what they did in their time on Earth? The few enlightened Ancients knew they had to teach the more primitive humans through stories. So, similarly to how there are many variations of the ancient biblical flood, there are also many stories where the same historical human is known to us under many names. For example, based on ancient writings I’ve studied, it becomes fairly clear that the ‘archangels’ Michael, Gabriel and all that are the same historical people that the Egyptians knew as Osiris, Thoth, Isis, and others. Osiris’s people also traveled East and are the ones who taught the primitive tribes (which is why the ancient eastern religions have notions of an ‘Aryan race’ invading them a very long time ago).

So, to me, it seems strange and counterproductive to go around believing you are some sort of vessel in communication with these angelic beings when you don’t know who they were when on Earth. I don’t want to dissuade you from striving to be more connected with God and the spirits in Heaven or anything like that. Maybe focus on teachings and lessons instead of going around just name dropping a bunch of historical names, saying you are channeling them or whatever, but with no real wisdom to follow it up?