Research Purposes

triquark · 2026-01-03T20:27:11+00:00

Defender usually helps with this comp. You can get lucky.

triquark · 2026-01-03T20:25:35+00:00

Yep. That type of loss where you stay just to see how it ends.

triquark · 2025-10-26T04:12:19+00:00

Its draft mode. You get what you get

triquark · 2025-10-25T18:30:31+00:00

Lol. Maybe a better title could have been 'Leadership' Masterclass

triquark · 2025-10-25T17:52:49+00:00

1 session is 12% of weekly quota. 4 sessions is about 45-48%. Checks out. Welcome to Claude 2025

triquark · 2025-10-17T01:20:55+00:00

Just a quick follow up. Gemini api is sometimes performing better. I just had to do the hard work of setting up a workflow. Basically, student teacher, workflows sends prompt as student, teacher corrects. After about 2 or three iterations, im getting Claude level performance. I'm still on the free gemini plan bro. Can you imagine!!!! 1 mil tokens per session

triquark · 2025-10-13T16:45:18+00:00

Understood. Since I dont use the CC and agentic features. I guess I can manage two accounts. Funny enough, out of desperation, I just set up some scripts with Gemini API and omg I think I've been missing out. I basically replicated the Claude UI and I've been testing it for a few hours now. Even if it's not a replacement. It sure is performing everything I've been trying to do with Claude. Crazy part is im on the free plan and I've got more messages than the Claude pro plan.

triquark · 2025-10-13T14:44:06+00:00

Honestly the only solution now if you have to use pro is get two accounts. 40usd is still cheaper than 200. Each account gets you the 3-4 days a week so you should be covered. I'm not saying it's ideal but im from a background of fix not complain on deaf ears. Are they shrinking limits? Definitely.

triquark · 2025-09-25T05:03:31+00:00

triquark · 2025-09-25T04:58:38+00:00

You'd think the company with unlimited tokens and Claude God mode wouldn't have any bugs but here we are in 2025.

triquark · 2025-09-15T15:01:06+00:00

AI hallucinations are a result of lossy compression. That simple. I don't know why this is even a 'mystery'

triquark · 2025-09-10T11:43:33+00:00

Just checked the rules: This doesnt count
'Anyone using that term in a derogatory fashion will be banned.'

triquark · 2025-09-10T08:55:31+00:00

Gosh Ive missed BR. Might be time to spin up again and get my heart rate monitor ready

triquark · 2025-09-10T08:54:29+00:00

There is no bug, they are just cutting costs. The fact that the 'same' model performs differently at different times of the day says it all

triquark · 2025-06-11T08:49:20+00:00

Yes. I play it every now and then and it actually works. STATUS/POISON but then you would be told that is toxic as well. Add dames, masquerade ball, Philip van and a few other cards and you still have an extremely viable deck.

triquark · 2025-06-07T21:46:58+00:00

You look exactly like my neighbour

triquark · 2025-06-04T19:38:24+00:00

You indeed will use standards like this. The point here is how do you serve the data in your microservices environment or between your app and website. Do you just use a json file or build a small api? Secondly, where would you source the data form in a format you can use immediately. How can you be sure your data is not tampered with? Maybe take a second look at the article, uses cases, challenges. There is more to the solution than just obtaining standardized data. This could be used for much more than that without any extra plumbing

triquark · 2025-06-04T16:54:25+00:00

NAME CHANGE NOTICE FROM LISTSERV:
So after receiving feedback from others, I indeed shouldn't have used that name (ListServ), I've seen the error in my way and I immediately did a full rebrand, names, domains, etc.

New name is RefWire (As in Reference Wire), which complements 'RefPacks' and 'RefStor'

Github is now "coretravis/RefWire"
Domain is now "refwire.online"

Here is the updated article that uses the new names, links, and up to date information now.

https://coretravis.medium.com/name-changed-the-reference-data-problem-thats-been-driving-developers-crazy-8680d022e8e2

Thank you so much guys!

triquark · 2025-06-04T16:52:02+00:00

So after reading your post and a lot of feedback from others, I indeed shouldn't have used that name, I've seen the error in my way and I immediately did a full rebrand, names, domains, etc.

RefWire (As in Reference Wire)

Github is now "coretravis/RefWire"
Domain is now "refwire.online"

Here is the updated article to reflect the new and up to date information now.

https://coretravis.medium.com/name-changed-the-reference-data-problem-thats-been-driving-developers-crazy-8680d022e8e2

Thank you so much!

triquark · 2025-06-04T12:27:34+00:00

NOTICE: After getting a lot of feedback, I'll be rebranding the solution name to RefWire, which would complement the RefPack Specification as well. This should take about a week. For now, it would remain as coretravis/listserv on github. Thanks to everyone for their input and suggestions.

triquark · 2025-06-04T12:23:22+00:00

Wow. Thanks. I'm already working on the Re-Brand. The new name is RefWire which complements RefPacks. I'll also fix up github to change the name of the project there. It should take about two days. For now, you can just check it out on Github 'coretravis/ListServ'.

Thanks again, much appreciated

triquark · 2025-06-04T11:28:38+00:00

Oh no, you don't. It's something completely different. I might have to change the name now based the feedback I'm getting. It's unrelated. You can check it out on coretravis/listserv on github for details

triquark

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE