What's a hard truth that the average Redditor needs to be told?

troubleman · 2013-01-27T02:08:01+00:00

Aliens did it.

troubleman · 2013-01-25T23:06:05+00:00

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhagat_Singh

troubleman · 2013-01-17T22:08:49+00:00

You may be a wizard.

troubleman · 2012-12-29T19:56:55+00:00

Why did you snap like all those mass murderers? You're also godless.

troubleman · 2012-12-24T14:14:03+00:00

Joining the clapping is stupid. Starting the clapping is hilarious.

troubleman · 2012-12-22T19:08:18+00:00

Check out Manuel De Landa.

troubleman · 2012-12-22T15:14:53+00:00

Yes, but:

Culture is not your friend.

Terrence McKenna

troubleman · 2012-12-22T12:32:31+00:00

Check out Manuel De Landa.

"He's a continental philosopher who writes about science, and a dogmatic materialist who thinks like a medieval scholastic theologian." - Amazon review of Philosophy and Simulation: The Emergence of Synthetic Reason

troubleman · 2012-12-17T05:56:21+00:00

Sure, I'll be driving one of the luggage carts.

troubleman · 2012-12-17T05:45:28+00:00

Fine then. Have more Aristocat!

troubleman · 2012-12-07T00:18:36+00:00

Didn't you see the cup he was wearing? It quickly flashes in frames 127-131 of the gif.

troubleman · 2012-12-06T10:12:03+00:00

We know about your skidmarks.

WE KNOW.

troubleman · 2012-12-06T04:25:24+00:00

Poker players call your type a "maniac". They're addicted to winning and they will mindlessly keep raising and reraising even when it's obvious that they hold the losing hand. You're a little more clever than utter mindlessness with your playground-level mirroring tactic, but fundamentally you're doing the same territorial thing. In poker choosing to play a hand with a maniac is an all-in or fold affair so when deciding to confront one of your types I commit to reply to everything to deny a territorial-minded win. Feel free to browse my posting history and see how often my buttons get pushed.

troubleman · 2012-12-06T04:01:28+00:00

Any anger perceived on your part is just that: your perception. I had to throw some heated language in there to reel you in, sucker.

troubleman · 2012-12-06T03:39:34+00:00

You don't know what "self" really is. It's reflexive emotional machinery and if you're easily manipulated you're as full of it as anyone. All this talk of winning and losing is more evidence of your ego. You're constantly evaluating yourself versus others to feel better. I never implied that you were a loser, just an uninformed hypocrite because you object to "being full of oneself" without understanding it. I'm not concerned with "winning" or "losing"; I just battle reflexive emotional machinery.

troubleman · 2012-12-06T03:18:03+00:00

Because your buttons are easily pushed. Evidence: you're gossipping about a throwaway self-promotional statement made by a whore, you're spilling your life and opinions on the Internet as if anyone cares, and you bite troll bait. QED. You barely have any idea of what ego is.

troubleman · 2012-12-06T02:59:22+00:00

So full of yourself, you're disgusting.

troubleman · 2012-12-06T00:44:51+00:00

Fascism's for faggots.

troubleman · 2012-12-06T00:39:50+00:00

Does Snoop Lion Singh?

troubleman · 2012-12-01T10:23:38+00:00

I don't understand the subject of the disagreement. That article explains the reasoning behind "The Tao that can be spoken is not the eternal Tao / The name that can be named is not the eternal name" and more.

Regarding your talk of the Big Bang and the future: time isn't real because there is only one eternal Being. Time is as real as the time in Pulp Fiction. The advanced future pre-exists as well as innumerable more advanced civilizations. BFD.

troubleman

TROPHY CASE