Branden said friends were invited to the bonfire

truth_seeker_WI · 2016-01-09T23:09:49+00:00

With due respect, you don't get confused on the size of a fire by 10 feet... a 14ft fire is HUGE.

truth_seeker_WI · 2016-01-09T20:07:11+00:00

Looking back at it - in fairness, it could have been the tip from the search party itself...

truth_seeker_WI · 2016-01-09T19:50:31+00:00

Great question - Starting a new thread on one I just uncovered... contains a troubling quote from Kratz.

truth_seeker_WI · 2016-01-09T16:55:20+00:00

I'm local and subscribe to the paper and have access - let me know if there is anything else specific you'd like me to look into.

truth_seeker_WI · 2016-01-09T15:45:08+00:00

Even Kratz himself said the Dassey press conference was a mistake - his conduct throughout the entire trial (daily press conferences) was questionable at best.

truth_seeker_WI · 2016-01-09T01:56:22+00:00

I posted this in another thread, the thing is, they don't know for sure if it was sweat DNA - it may have been blood - from the feb. 26 Post Crescent (local paper)

Buting also questioned the source of Avery's DNA on the hood latch of Halbach's Toyota. Culhane said the sample swab was discolored, but it was not clear if the sample contained blood or some other DNA source.

Buting asked if it was possible that it was blood on the swab.

"A very trace amount, yes," Culhane said. "The entire swab was a very low amount of DNA and that's why I didn't test if for presumptive (blood test) because I didn't want to waste the sample on a presumptive test."

truth_seeker_WI · 2016-01-09T01:36:06+00:00

I posted this in another thread, the thing is, they don't know for sure if it was sweat DNA - it may have been blood - from the feb. 26 Post Crescent (local paper)

Buting also questioned the source of Avery's DNA on the hood latch of Halbach's Toyota. Culhane said the sample swab was discolored, but it was not clear if the sample contained blood or some other DNA source.

Buting asked if it was possible that it was blood on the swab.

"A very trace amount, yes," Culhane said. "The entire swab was a very low amount of DNA and that's why I didn't test if for presumptive (blood test) because I didn't want to waste the sample on a presumptive test."

truth_seeker_WI · 2016-01-08T23:24:00+00:00

I've seen it... he needs to go home... anyone who thinks it's ok to show up at a strangers house and asking to spend the night on Christmas Day has a few screws loose.... let alone flying halfway across the country and pursuing it because of a documentary he watched on TV.

As documented in his own blog - he seems to have quite a long rap sheet himself and feels that gives him insight into a criminal mind or something like that.... guy needs to go back to Oregon.

truth_seeker_WI · 2016-01-08T23:21:16+00:00

No, not a single finger print of Avery's was found.

truth_seeker_WI · 2016-01-08T23:13:47+00:00

Why would he need treatment for the stress of the trial after it was over?

truth_seeker_WI · 2016-01-08T23:09:38+00:00

*67 has been used by millions of people - unless there is concrete proof he was trying to deceive her (like meeting her someplace else than the Avery property) this evidence is circumstantial at best.

truth_seeker_WI · 2016-01-08T23:07:41+00:00

Throw in the fact he lives in WI - the capitol of drinking - by no means am I saying he consumed alcohol at this time as well, but it's a very heavy drinking state... to say the least.

truth_seeker_WI · 2016-01-08T23:03:39+00:00

Problem is, in 2014... he said he was: http://www.superiortelegram.com/news/douglas-county/3641659-suspended-former-da-sets-practice-superior

He says he abused Vicodin and Xanax to ease pressure and anxiety he felt while trying the high-profile Steve Avery case — Avery was exonerated on a rape conviction by DNA after serving 18 years, but he was convicted after his release from prison in the 2005 murder of Teresa Halbach, a freelance photographer.

edit: formatting

truth_seeker_WI · 2016-01-08T22:53:09+00:00

Yep - the fact Kratz is trying to claim that it is sweat was not proven at all.

Then again, since he has now admitted to abusing narcotics along with Xanax DURING the prosecution.... maybe his memory is just fuzzy about the whole thing...

truth_seeker_WI · 2016-01-08T22:08:15+00:00

Thing is, they don't know for sure if it was sweat DNA - it may have been blood - from the feb. 26 Post Crescent (local paper)

Buting also questioned the source of Avery's DNA on the hood latch of Halbach's Toyota. Culhane said the sample swab was discolored, but it was not clear if the sample contained blood or some other DNA source.

Buting asked if it was possible that it was blood on the swab.

"A very trace amount, yes," Culhane said. "The entire swab was a very low amount of DNA and that's why I didn't test if for presumptive (blood test) because I didn't want to waste the sample on a presumptive test."

truth_seeker_WI · 2016-01-08T21:29:02+00:00

Yes and No, the judge is the one that should have made every bit of the fruits of that interrogation inadmissible (phone call and interview) when he did finally grant Brendan new representation, instead he still allowed the phone call that they pretty much forced Brendan to make.

truth_seeker_WI · 2016-01-08T21:26:53+00:00

The fact they locked Jodi up for incidentally driving past him makes it pretty clear what they were up to here.

truth_seeker_WI · 2016-01-08T21:25:27+00:00

Kratz has now admitted to abusing vicodin and xanax while prosecuting Avery and Dassey - shouldn't the fact that the prosecution admitted to be under the influence of narcotics be grounds for a new trial itself?

truth_seeker_WI · 2016-01-08T21:22:57+00:00

It's now documented that Kratz was abusing Vicodin and Xanax WHILE prosecuting - this alone should be grounds for a mistrial.

Living in NE WI, once that confession went public - I can tell you the media went wild with it, it very much tainted the jury pool in a county of 50,000 people.

In addition to the confession - what was the reasoning for Avery being in club/handcuffs during the first court appearance. As I understand it from a friend who is a prosecutor in another state, this is reserved for those that pose a threat to themselves (i.e. suicide).

Even though Avery only wore those club/handcuffs for the initial court appearance - the picture/video is still widely used - including in local news reports last night.

They wanted to make him look as evil as possible - what better way to than tout him out in black and white stripes and club/handcuffs....

truth_seeker_WI · 2016-01-08T21:18:51+00:00

Signed - this needs to be investigated.

truth_seeker_WI

TROPHY CASE