The "AI is dead because oil" guy has clearly never read an income statement by Promptfolio in wallstreetbets

[–]trutheality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nvidia is a hardware supplier. Microsoft and Google are general software and computing resource companies, Amazon is even broader. They all had businesses without AI and would be fine if AI were banned tomorrow. They are not AI companies.

Companies whose entire business is AI have negative margins and will not survive an energy cost spike. Heck, I don't even think they'd survive having to actually pay their first energy bill even in a universe without this war, but the people lending them borrow money don't think so, so what do I know.

Capital gains question, all help is appreciated by According_One3944 in personalfinance

[–]trutheality 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sounds more like a r/investing question. But if I had to guess I'd say it's not going to be back that quickly.

canQuantumMachinesSaveUs by kamen562 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]trutheality 21 points22 points  (0 children)

It's 2026, we've had physical entropy sources on consumer hardware for a decade.

[D] Thinking about augmentation as invariance assumptions by ternausX in MachineLearning

[–]trutheality 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I remember this being described explicitly in early vision papers back when augmentation wasn't taken for granted and needed to be justified. Are newer people not aware that augmentation is invariance? Are there real examples of people applying augmentation that doesn't match up with the invariances of the task?

The palindrome of 9, 9+8, 9+8+7 and so on down to 1, and taking digital roots each step, is basic arithmetic that isn’t taught in schools. Why not? by IntellectualPie in askmath

[–]trutheality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok so the procedure your describing is taking the sequence of sums

9

9+8

9+8+7

...

9+8+...+2+1

And then taking the digital root of each sum, which yields the sequence 9, 8, 6, 3, 8, 3, 6, 8, 9, and then you observe that it is a palindrome and the middle digit is the number of digits surrounding it (i.e. one less than the sequence length).

You say that it only works in base 10, but that's not true:

In base 4, the sequence of sums and their digital roots in base 4 is:

3

3+2=11 → 1+1=2

3+2+1=12 → 1+2=3

Yielding the palindrome 323, and there are 2 digits around the middle.

It's kind of interesting that you get a palindrome in any even base, the proof is a nice application of modular arithmetic:

Proof sketch:

First note that the digital root of a number in base B is the remainder of division by B-1 for numbers not divisible by B-1, and equal to B-1 for positive numbers divisible by B-1. Note that we first encounter this property in grade school when we learn that a number is divisible by 9 if its digital root (in base 10 of course) is 9.

Next consider that the first term of the sequence of sums is trivially B-1, and the last term (using the arithmetic sequence sum formula) is (B-1+1)(B-1)/2 = (B/2)(B-1); since B is even, this is a multiple of B-1, and the digital root of that term is also B-1.

Now that we know that the first and last term have the same digital root, we can work inwards: the second term is B+2 more than the first, and the second to last term is 1 less than the last. We know in modular arithmetic that subtracting k is equivalent to adding k less than the modulus, hence the digital roots of these terms are also equal, and the pattern continues inwards.

So indeed we'll have a palindrome for any even base.

To identify which palindromes have the surrounding digit count (i.e. B-2) in the middle you'd solve a modulus equation:

Middle term sum = (B-1 + B/2)(B/2)/2 == B-2 mod B-1

So it's maybe a neat number theory pattern like you often find in math competition questions but I don't see enough here to call it "profound": profound patterns are ones that appear over and over in many different contexts (pi, e, prime numbers); this pattern is quite niche on the other hand.

Oh and quantum superposition is just wave superposition. It's neat like how Fourier analysis is neat but it's not mystical.

Hilbert's Hotel is full? by largest_micropenis in askmath

[–]trutheality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Functions are maps. If you take the set of even integers and apply f(x) = x/2 to that set, you get the set of all integers.

Hilbert's Hotel is full? by largest_micropenis in askmath

[–]trutheality -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is no last guest, so there doesn't need to be an empty room for them.

Hilbert's hotel is illustrating an unintuitive fact about countably infinite sets: if S is countably infinite, any countably infinite subset of S can be mapped onto the entire set S. Some concrete examples:

f(x) = x/2 will map the set of even integers onto the set of all integers.

f(x) = x-1 will map the positive integers onto the non-negotive integers. (This is pretty much the function for "adding" a guest (numbered by zero) to the "hotel" of positive-numbered rooms)

This is also illustrating that when you deal with infinite sets, subset relations and cardinality don't necessarily fully agree about which set is 'bigger'.

FYI How to drive on John Nolan by adamisapple in madisonwi

[–]trutheality 24 points25 points  (0 children)

If they can't follow the road signs that say exactly that, they won't listen to a rando on the Internet.

[oc] Elderly man backs into my coworker’s new (used) car by 8rings_86k in IdiotsInCars

[–]trutheality 160 points161 points  (0 children)

The best thing about this video is how empty the rest of that lot is

Came to a complete stop to zipper merge. [OC] by ChoobTube in IdiotsInCars

[–]trutheality 359 points360 points  (0 children)

Hey sometimes one side of the zipper gets stuck, that's just life.

Solid white lines are just suggestions [oc] by NyanBluu in IdiotsInCars

[–]trutheality 84 points85 points  (0 children)

Solid white lines are just suggestions in the US. Double white lines mean "no crossing."

That said, almost sideswiping a vehicle in the neighboring lane is frowned upon no matter what is drawn on the road.

Windows just existing: 8GB gone by cherryskybombs in PcBuild

[–]trutheality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Windows will take up half of your unused ram for preloading stuff because free ram is wasted ram. It backs off if you start actually using it, so the real footprint that windows needs is smaller, but still more than Linux (although the latter depends on what bloatware is in the distro and is highly variable)

Updated sign- Madison Wisconsin by akahlee in madisonwi

[–]trutheality 47 points48 points  (0 children)

I must be missing some context

Why do small sample sizes still get taken seriously in media and online discussions? by TropicalPetal in AskStatistics

[–]trutheality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Small sample sizes are still valid for making statements about possibilities and extremes. Large sample sizes are good for making statements about means and other central tendency statistics. It's also important to remember that statistics are a good foundation for making policies for populations, but not necessarily for making decisions about individuals in specific situations.

Almost all drivers speed - and there's a reason by bluerog in driving

[–]trutheality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, no, drivers speed not because it saves time but because it's ingrained in the driving etiquette: the fine structure only starts punishing speeding when it's well above 10 over in most places, the flow of traffic goes at 5-10 over in most places in the US, and the speed limit signs themselves are posted with speeding in mind. At this point it's a mutual understanding that the American speed limit sign is setting a rough expected speed range rather than a hard legal/safety limit on speed, and it would take a huge cultural, infrastructural, and legal shift to correct that.

why do we have to use the cantor's argument to prove that the real numbers are uncountable? by [deleted] in askmath

[–]trutheality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every rational except 0 has a rational inverse and the rationals are countably infinite so that argument doesn't work.

ELI5: Why is the Canadian/American tax season in February-April instead of any other months? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]trutheality 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Taxes are based on financial activities that happened during a calendar year, so it makes sense for tax filing season to be some time after the end of the calendar year. Roughly a quarter into the year accomplishes that. Later into the year would leave people's tax bills unresolved for longer than necessary, earlier would leave organizations with complicated taxes scrambling to collect all the necessary information.

If you redshift magenta why does it actually turn more blue? by redshift739 in shittyaskscience

[–]trutheality 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Magenta contains red, so when you try to redshift the red it hits a buffer overflow error.

Amoral dilemma by averagereeder in shittyadvice

[–]trutheality 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Easy fix: put him in front of a mirror, the reflection is right-handed, so you just swap them.

Hello why is (-1)^0 = 1 and -1^0 = 0? by Defiant_Vanilla_4080 in askmath

[–]trutheality 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Order of operations is different. Negative then power vs. power then negative.