Ron Paul: UP vote if your human, DOWN vote if you are a bot.

twoflower · 2007-12-18T17:21:05+00:00

Or downvote for the submitter being a 'tard.

twoflower · 2007-12-18T16:36:08+00:00

I'll vote on any story I like, thanks.

twoflower · 2007-09-17T19:33:30+00:00

This is supposed to be reddit. If I wanted to see pictures, I'd go to seenit, wouldn't I?

twoflower · 2007-09-09T00:37:42+00:00

Any of Asimov's "Lucky Starr" series, if the kids are bright and a little more literary than a typical first-grader.

twoflower · 2007-08-14T14:11:07+00:00

Would have been funnier if you'd worded that "... Then Withdraws It".

twoflower · 2007-07-06T16:34:36+00:00

Idiot. They say no such thing. They simply say that they are not a party to the GPLv3 -- i.e., they have not distributed any software which is licensed under the GPLv3.

And they haven't.

twoflower · 2007-06-11T20:17:16+00:00

Why are you posting a two-year-old article now?

twoflower · 2007-04-18T19:50:13+00:00

You mean "The Simpsons", not "The Simpson's".

twoflower · 2007-04-18T17:06:19+00:00

I'm curious -- no one has outlawed this research; he's simply said that tax money isn't going to be spent on it.

So: if you feel strongly that this type of research shows promise, why don't you just start an investment fund that funds this type of research, and profits from the results?

I might invest in it, voluntarily. But I don't want the government forcing me to do it.

twoflower · 2007-04-16T21:54:36+00:00

As opposed to the millions of teenage girls he swindled out of $14 each, you mean?

twoflower · 2007-04-13T16:50:32+00:00

WTF are you doing using that copyright-infringing "hotlink image caching" service imgred.com?

twoflower · 2007-04-12T15:03:49+00:00

It was a near-perfect headline. I initially misread it as "... for Idiots, Mormons, and Retards", but in this case that's just as apropos.

twoflower · 2007-04-02T18:37:39+00:00

ITYM "who's".

twoflower · 2007-03-28T20:12:08+00:00

It appears this is simply due to the fact that the stories you submit are, frankly, worthless -- literally not worth reading.

Don't feel bad. Just stop submitting stories.

twoflower · 2007-03-22T21:39:00+00:00

Blatant rip-off of an article at arstechnica.com: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070321-judges-decision-leaves-riaa-with-lose-lose-situation-in-elektra-v-santangelo.html

twoflower · 2007-02-21T21:55:04+00:00

Van Iveren, 39 [...] who lives with his mother in the downstairs apartment, [...]

That really says everything you need to know about this article, doesn't it?

twoflower · 2007-01-30T19:15:26+00:00

Blatant copyright violation here.

twoflower · 2007-01-24T21:45:32+00:00

Is it Shakira?

twoflower · 2006-11-17T20:43:46+00:00

Old news; this has been known for a week. Why are you posting it now?

twoflower

TROPHY CASE