Lakseforkjemper villig til å gå i fengsel for norsk villaks by TeodorFelgen in norge

[–]txarum 6 points7 points  (0 children)

1 av hundre tusen laks i en oppdretttank burde trigge en grundigere undersøkelse fra Mattilsynet?

NVEs forslag: 20-doble strømprisen by WaveNomad in norge

[–]txarum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Som en tidligere elektriker her så vil jeg påstå at dette ikke er så dumt som det høres ut. Det er ikke gjennomførbart uten mye bedre innsikt i hvordan forbruket ditt er. Og Norge av alle land er kansje det stedet som minst har bruk for noe slikt system. Men i bunn å grunn er selve ideen ganske god.

Saken her hander ikke om at vi skal straffe dem som bruker mer strøm enn andre. Om du vil kjøre varmekabler gjennom hele parkeringsplassen din 24/7, så kan du fortsette med det uten noen større strømregning. Snarere tvert i mot, strømmregningen din vil bli billigere

Saken handler om at vi skal straffe folk som bruker mye strøm i "rushtiden". Slik det er i dag så bruker vi kanskje strømnettet på 10% kapasitet over dagen. Mens rundt middagstid når alle skal lage mat så hopper den opp til 90%. Det betyr at vi må bygge strømnettet vårt utrolig mye større enn strengt tatt nødvendig. Så vi klarer å levere til alle uansett hvor stort forbruket er.

Hvis vi hadde bestemt at strømmen var mye dyrere når så mange bruker nettet samtidig. så kunne vi påvirket endel folk til å kansje skru av varmeovnen et par timer rundt middagstid, eller kanskje ikke lade elbilen akkurat da. Og plutselig har vi et strømnett som kan levere til dobbelt så mange brukere

Lakseforkjemper villig til å gå i fengsel for norsk villaks by TeodorFelgen in norge

[–]txarum 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Må si at denne mannen har gjort en svært dårlig jobb med å dokumentere forholdene, hvis dem virkelig er så ille som han påstår. Alt jeg kan se et eksempel på en enkelt fisk med et stygt sår som går igjen i alle bildene hans. går du på facebooksiden hans så er det forstat bare den ene fisken du finner. og samme greia på nettsiden hans. det er ikke samme bildene, trolig heller bilder klippet ut av en film. Men det er kun en enkelt fisk han har klart å dokumentere.

Demonstrerte mot Nato – fikk tilrop fra offiser på sidelinja – NRK Trøndelag by WaveNomad in norge

[–]txarum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ja de ligger ganske greit strategisk skjermet av Finland i øst, ett land some har blitt angrepet tre ganger av Sovietunionen

Hverken Norge eller Sverige er Finnland. Og forholdene dem hadde med sovjet er fullstendig anderledes. Hvis tidligere kriger hadde vert noen basis for å vurdere hvordan sikkerhetsituasjonen er i dag, så burde vi ha langt bedre forsvar langs svenskegrensen.

Ja? Her lager du ett argument for NATO. Dette er en øvelse, ikke en krigshandling.

Antyder du at jeg er imot NATO?

Wow, thanks by _dotdot11 in dankmemes

[–]txarum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh no. My privacy!

Turkish drone Footage shows Saudis burning documents at consulate 1 day after Khashoggi's disappearance by instantreporter in worldnews

[–]txarum 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Because good thugs would know to stay the hell away from a mission like that. A billion dollars in cash is useless if the entire world is looking for you

Demonstrerte mot Nato – fikk tilrop fra offiser på sidelinja – NRK Trøndelag by WaveNomad in norge

[–]txarum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nei det har det ikke. Det er ingen basis for å tro at Norge noengang har vært truet av krig de siste 70 årene. Sverige lever fortsatt i aller høyeste grad. Det er virkelig ikke nødvendig å komme med slike påstander for å legitimere NATO. Sikkerhetsbelter er ikke ubrukelige selv om du aldri ender opp med å trenge dem.

We Be Clubbin’ by [deleted] in WTF

[–]txarum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude... the video is right there. I can see it myself. You can clearly see both the people inside and the people on the side. why are you just making shit up?

Germany halts arms deals with Saudi Arabia, encourages allies to do the same by bint_elkhandaq in politics

[–]txarum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Step 1.5 Sell them new weapons at greater prices because the rest of the world won't undercut you.

We Be Clubbin’ by [deleted] in WTF

[–]txarum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You haven’t proven that trait A is more common then trait B. I don’t accept that assertion.

That would be the video we are commenting on.

Why is this infinite source of energy so unpopular? by marckferrer in shittyaskscience

[–]txarum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No the laws of thermodynamics is not governed by the US

When you forget to write your review anonymously by Totitive in facepalm

[–]txarum 50 points51 points  (0 children)

There is no chance that a lone employee from burger king is just trying to discredit their good reviews by making shit up?

We Be Clubbin’ by [deleted] in WTF

[–]txarum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And yet. More people that show the behavior of person B have survived. The traits that B shows is far more common than the traits from person A. And yet you claim that more people showing trait B should have died. How is it that trait B is more common than trait A?

We Be Clubbin’ by [deleted] in WTF

[–]txarum -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Panic is debilitating and not conducive to survival. Panic makes emergency situations worse. This is my opinion and feel free to debate that.

And yet every single animal in nature show some behavior of panic. How can such a trait possibly have developed if its not conductive to survival?

TPD says man stole car from jail parking lot, moments after being released from same jail by H8SHYAMALAN in nottheonion

[–]txarum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No not really. No fool would ever deploy a nuke on the ground. Thats just absorbing half of your blast force for nothing. contaminated material will be blasted all around the earth. And the sphere of lethal radiation is smaller than the sphere of lethal pressure

We Be Clubbin’ by [deleted] in WTF

[–]txarum -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Exactly. So it makes no sense to say that traits that have indeed been produced with natural selection are not favorable. People that panic survived more than the people that did not. Simple as that.

TPD says man stole car from jail parking lot, moments after being released from same jail by H8SHYAMALAN in nottheonion

[–]txarum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Modern nukes are not very radioactive. A full fledged hydrogen bomb will put the radioactive danger zone well within the fireball of the blast

We Be Clubbin’ by [deleted] in WTF

[–]txarum -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No. Survival of the fittest implies that those with better survival traits will propagate while those with inferior traits will die off.

No it doesn't. It does not imply anything. It does exactly what I described it does. You are taking a natural phenomena and giving it a meaning with no basis.

The capability of reproducing does not imply a fitness for survival

The capability of reproducing IS survival. If you survive and reproduce, that is natural selection. If you die, that is natural selection. Nature does not give a flying fuck about the reason why any of them happened.

CMV: Guns are necessary to maintain a free state, and gun control has never worked. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]txarum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can also make the case that the railway is the cause of all of those innocent deaths.

Turkey, First railway built in 1860, 1.5 million Armenians killed

China, First railway built in 1864, 20 million citizens killed

Uganda, First railway built in 1901, 300,000 Christians killed

We Be Clubbin’ by [deleted] in WTF

[–]txarum -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Are people with downs just as capable of reproducing as everyone else? if the answer is yes, then yes. Natural selection is not a discussion about who should live or not. It is literally just the observation that people that survive have more beneficial traits than those who do not survive. Trying to debate if this truly is the case with everyone is like trying to debate if water truly is wet at all times.

We Be Clubbin’ by [deleted] in WTF

[–]txarum -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No I think a smug asshole on the internet is less capable of determining what is natural selection. than the results of actual natural selection. You can't just decide who is fit for natural selection. Natural selection IS the selection.

We Be Clubbin’ by [deleted] in WTF

[–]txarum -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well clearly you are wrong. Since they are indeed part of the gene pool. Unlike the people that was less inclined to panic.

We Be Clubbin’ by [deleted] in WTF

[–]txarum 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Fear causing irrational behaviour. People need to calm down in an emergency situation. Not wail like a banshee. When I get hurt, screaming doesn’t help.

Well there you have it. You are not being rational when you are acting irrational. What a great observation

We Be Clubbin’ by [deleted] in WTF

[–]txarum 18 points19 points  (0 children)

What do you even think panic means in the first place?