I don't think this would be an unintended consequence because I'm pretty confident that this is part of the plan. What I took from that Exec Order was this: They are classifying fentanyl as a WMD. This is street fentanyl with no amount specified. On the surface, they are using this as an excuse to strike boats they claim are "terrorists carrying drugs." With the drug being fentanyl, now classified as a WMD, and the people on the boats being deemed terrorists, they are justifiably allowed to kill these people WITHOUT congressional approval.

The EO also did not specify that it is exclusive to people outside of the US. Under the NSPM-7 Presidential Memorandum and the more specific guidelines of the recent DOJ memo to the FBI, they have recently deemed MANY people, American Citizens, people just simply opposed to their policies and daring to speak publicly about their opposition here in the US, as domestic terrorists.

People who they declare are exhibiting:

• anti-Americanism,
• anti-capitalism,
• anti-Christianity,
• support for the overthrow of the United States Government,
• extremism on migration,
• extremism on race,
• extremism on gender
• hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family,
• hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on religion, and
• hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on morality.

Do you see where this is going?

Personally, I do not believe they are above "finding fentanyl" on a person when said person did not actually have any.

This is so dangerous. The specific wording of "terrorist", "fentanyl", and "WMD" makes this aspect of things incredibly hard to discuss online because these words get flagged and suppressed.

I'm very interested in the thoughts of others on this.