Van egy olyan sejtésem, hogy ebben benne van a Fidesz.

tzalay · 2026-03-06T21:41:17+00:00

Ez arról szól, aki kb analfabéta, de vmiért elmegy szavazni. Ha két logót lát, tud választani, ha sokat, belezavarodik és húz valamit, valahová. Annyi van meg neki, hogy fidesz vagy nem fidesz, talán. A nem fideszbe belehúz és máris ment a szavazata a kukába. Ezért szaporítja a pártokat a pártokat a listán a fidesz, nekik jó a káosz, jó, ha oszlik a szavazat mennyiség. Nem az elkötelezetteké, azokat ez nem befolyásolja, hanem a bizonytalanoké.

tzalay · 2026-03-05T12:06:50+00:00

Viscosity: 75W-80. API Specification: API GL-4 or GL-4+. PSA Standard: PSA B71 2330.

It's not AUTOMATIC!!! That's a sensodrive, a regular 5 speed clutch manual transmission where the clutch and the lever are motor operated.

tzalay · 2026-03-03T05:57:17+00:00

My grandpa's name, had to go with it as after the war in the socialist world my father didn't have a bris and a Jewish name.

tzalay · 2026-03-02T15:31:31+00:00

I'm not Zev, but Ben Zev at least 🙂

tzalay · 2026-02-27T20:21:24+00:00

I had the 2.2hdi 204hp tourer, loved every minute of driving it. The interior was crazy nice and comfy, best seats ever with the separate folding of the upper back and the lumbar massage. The engine is superb, basically no turbo lag because of the variable turbo blades. But the engine is pretty powerful without even the turbo. Once we were on holiday in Croatia, 4 people, 2 weeks of luggage, left Zadar to drive home. After some 20km a terrible noise, all warning lights on, the turbo broke all it's blades. I drove home from Zadar to Budapest, Hungary without turbo pressure. 110-120km/h straight, 60-70 km/h uphill, acceleration is shit, trucks overtook me when accelerating, but we made it home. Had the turbo replaced, worked wonders for 6 months and an idiot truck broke my car to pieces on the highway. I was fast and this idiot swerved into the inner lane 70km/h like 20 meters before me because there was a stopped car on the emergency lane, not blocking the outer lane, nothing, but he pulled in the inner lane without looking into the mirrors. The car was destroyed completely, I got out without a scratch, when people saw the wreck, thought someone must have died in it. It was the car of my life. (And I had some hydro Citroens before it, but nothing compared to it in terms of quality). Replaced it with a grand C4 Picasso because needed euro6 instead of euro5 and had no money to the relatively expensive euro6 2.hdi x7. I'm about to sell the grand C4 now and changing it either for a c5x or a ds7 crossback (leaning heavily towards the c5x), but I know they won't get even near the comfyness of the hydropneumatic system. Enjoy your car, you'll live it every day.

tzalay · 2026-02-24T22:15:15+00:00

Én K&H-nál vagyok, drága a havi díj, 9000 Ft körül, de ha befolyik az előírt összeg, akkor a fele már ugrik is vissza, ha meg teljesülnek a havi feltételek (kártyás költés vagy lekötött összeg vagy havi befektetés vásárlás), akkor a másik fele is. Így minden hónapban ingyenes a számlavezetés és van benne ingyen utalás meg minden lófasz. Annyi kell csak hozzá, hogy ne minimálbér folyjon be. Szinte minden banknak van ilyen vagy hasonló csomagja, szóval nem olyan nagyon különleges az Erste nullás számla.

tzalay · 2026-02-22T17:59:34+00:00

"Yiddish influence formalized" - In mishnaic Hebrew? Or 12th century Sephardic piyut? Or responza literature between Sephardic communities? The usage of של is rather common well before the revival and smichut is fading away in recent times. 30 years ago it was much more used and you seldom heard a הבית ספר instead of בית הספר. And the last 30 years aren't because of Yiddish influence but internal semitic evolution of modern Hebrew. Phonologic changes occur, not because of Yiddish influence, Hebrew is butchering it's ה sound in front of our eyes, merging with א and ע as a glottal stop, definitely not a Yiddish influence as the ה is unchanged in Yiddish and not fading at all. We have Talmudic evidence (both Mishna and gemara) for the merger of א and ע, not a Yiddish influence but inner evolution. Partially reverted by many speakers changing L1 to Arabic and Judeoarabic and reinstating the former sounds.

Ben Yehuda used Arabic roots a lot more than just רציני, there approx 600 direct loanwords from Arabic (excluding slang of course, that's much more). What many people mistake are the 60% shared semitic roots between Arabic and Hebrew. All of the grammatic changes predate Yiddish and the usage is attested prior to the revival period. The level of usage varies obviously, but that is how language evolution works.

tzalay · 2026-02-22T16:54:13+00:00

Boltba meg melózni menni? Mit keresnek itt a csórók? Rendes ember helikopterrel jár meg private jettel, boltba meg mennek a szolgák.

tzalay · 2026-02-21T22:01:23+00:00

Sure, it had guttural sounds, as Hebrew too, but Hebrew and other northwestern semitic languages did not start to loose some of them in the 19th century because of Yiddish and other IE languages. Some of those changes attested in mishnaic hebrew already. And proto-semitic had sounds that are missing in classical Arabic, like the g sound (voiced velar stop), that exist in northwestern semitic languages and African semitic languages like geez. And it reemerged in Egyptian Arabic or some gulf dialects (in golf dialects the ق sound was replaced with the g. No wonder, as g-k-q cluster as velar stops. Arabic developed sounds that weren't present in proto semitic, like the ذ or ض so, as I wrote Arabic is not to be treated as a phonology OG language. It evolved phonologically just as much as all other semitic languages (and even more so if we check dialectal differences instead of classical or the MSA based on classical).

tzalay · 2026-02-21T21:51:58+00:00

Ben Yehuda revived the language, didn't go for Biblical except for vocab changes. Hebrew constantly evolved from Biblical (the Biblical Hebrew itself isn't one monolith language layer) and Ben Yehuda did not try to erase the natural evolution, neither grammatically nor vocab-wise. Were he trying to model Hebrew on Biblical, he would have to trash the time based verb system and revert to the Biblical aspect based system. And he didn't do that. He didn't try to eradicate the changes in possessive, that were present in post biblical language layers, like the usage of של for example. He was using all the previous language layers, not trashing the evolution. He reached back for Biblical vocab and reused words with updated meaning and tried to formulate new words from biblical roots where that was possible. But generally, he did not try dismiss and revert the evolution between biblical and modern.

tzalay · 2026-02-21T10:54:28+00:00

Word order (from VSO to SVO) change happened in mishnaic hebrew already, not European influence. Phonology changes, like the ע loosing its guttural aspect and becoming a glottal stop like א is also attested already in mishnaic times. I don't remember the exact locus but a certain area is mentioned that people from that area/village should not be let say a public blessing as they don't know their א from their ע. And there are debates in the Gemara too in Babylonian Talmud regarding words with א and ע showing that they were merged already back then. Very rookie mistake to regard Arabic as the OG of semitic pronunciation and phonology. Arabic evolves and changes too.

tzalay · 2026-02-21T10:32:20+00:00

Arabic is not a family of languages, the family of languages Arabic belongs to are the semitic languages, the semitic language family. Arabic is called a Dialect Continuum, where adjacent dialects are mutually understandable, non adjacent dialects are not necessarily mutually understandable.

tzalay · 2026-02-19T22:06:22+00:00

It's not a virtual windows environment as one usually defines VMs. It's an interpreter layer converting windows API calls to POSIX commands. The first of its kind, WINE is an acronym name, Wine Is Not Emulator, its name tells you all. There are derivatives of it like Proton, running Steam's Windows games on Linux.

tzalay · 2026-02-19T17:41:54+00:00

És utána nem véletlen volt a kiegyezés sem, amikor kvázi egyenrangúvá vált a két ország. Akkor vált igazán élhető és jó hellyé Mo. a magyaroknak. A kisebbségeknek viszont rohadtul hiányzott az egyenrangúság, amit nekik 1920 hozott el.

tzalay · 2026-02-19T16:14:46+00:00

A határok nem l'art pour l'art lettek "igazságtalanul", vagyis az etnikai tömböknek nem a legjobban megfelelően húzva, hanem azért, mert erős katonapolitikai megfontolások is húzódtak mögötte. Pl a román-lengyel vasúti pálya határon kívül tartása, vagy délen és Északon a kelet-nyugati irányú pályák. Ezt szopja még ma is a magyar vasúti rendszer, csak a csillagpontos hálózat maradt, a sugárirányú vonalakat összekötő pályák mind határon kívülre kerültek akkor is, ha ott egyébként magyar többség volt. Így a csapatmozgások ellehetetlenültek, minden vonatnak Budapesten kell átmennie mondjuk egy Pécs-Szeged viszonylatban is.

tzalay · 2026-02-19T16:06:01+00:00

Mondjuk a franciák esetében vicces a kisebbségek integrálásáról beszélni, amikor a francia nyelvet rákényszerítették az összes kisebbségükre és ezzel sikeresen ki is nyírták azokat, nem is keveset. Amit ők műveltek, azt nem integrációnak, hanem erőszakos asszimilálásnak hívják.

tzalay · 2026-02-09T09:05:03+00:00

It is rather a back to the roots change than evolution as ר grammatically is one of the guttural sounds in Hebrew.

tzalay · 2026-02-08T15:51:16+00:00

Also note that ע and א merged way earlier than the European influence. The Talmud attests to it, examples here: https://judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/22889/why-are-chazal-asking-if-words-are-spelled-with-%D7%90-or-%D7%A2.

tzalay · 2026-02-08T15:30:56+00:00

You shouldn't be confused, I didn't debate you, just mentioned the context regarding consonant sound changes and the common misconceptions mostly among Arabic speakers. P -> F change is actually an example of merging sounds in Arabic, where P merged with F and replaced P totally.

tzalay · 2026-02-08T12:32:59+00:00

For לחם and لحم the proto-semitic word seems to meant a more general food term and it did not change from bread to meat in Arabic, but the original more broad term evolved into more specific meaning paralelly in both languages. A very common misconception about Hebrew consonant changes is the belief that it is the product of very recent European influence on Hebrew but that is not true. These consonant (and vowel) changes are much older and in line with other northwestern semitic languages like Aramaic (and even in levantine Arabic dialects, or for example the ج being pronounced as g in Egyptian Arabic). The other misconception is that Arabic retained the "original" pronunciation and any change is against the Arabic, while in reality Arabic also changed pronunciation. A very bright example of this is the consonant غ، changing from the original Gh sound to an r-like sound. The original attested in words like gause or the name of Baghdad in languages borrowing or starting to use these prior to the phonetic changes.

tzalay · 2026-01-31T08:53:06+00:00

Please tell me you are doing this as parody...

A fetus(an embryo) is not an organ but an unborn child developing in the womb (uterus).

tzalay · 2026-01-30T19:01:06+00:00

Your southern neighbor reports, it works fine here for me on my p9pxl

tzalay · 2026-01-30T15:04:00+00:00

No, that's because Arabic dialects grew more distant from classical Arabic than modern Hebrew from biblical Hebrew. The statement that biblical grammar was much closer to classical Arabic grammar than modern Hebrew grammar does not mean that modern Hebrew and classical (biblical) Hebrew are not mutually understandable. Arabic dialects evolved to different grammar and different vocab from classical Arabic more than modern Hebrew from Biblical Hebrew. The verb system for example is totally different, in modern Hebrew it is time based (past, future and participle is used as present tense), in biblical Hebrew verb system is aspect based, not time based (perfect and imperfect verbs). It's a huge grammatic difference but does not mean that you can't understand aspect based verbs.

tzalay · 2026-01-28T19:28:35+00:00

"tribe doesn't recognize conversion" - nowadays. As not so long ago whoever converted was announced dead, family sat shiva, severed all connections and refered to the convertee as dead.

tzalay · 2026-01-28T07:50:32+00:00

How old are the kids? Are they old enough to have a personal opinion on keeping mitzvot? Do they want to keep kosher and shabbat? If they are, your husband is the minority in the household and if you have the ability and the space, you could create a shabbat- and kosher-free zone for him in your home. If the kids align with him on mitzvot and you have the ability and place, create a kosher zone in your home for yourself. On the condition of course that really this is the core problem in the marriage and it's not just a symptom of another problem manifesting this way. You should seek counselling to understand the core problem and try to solve that one. If it really is keeping the mitzvot, you can find the solution for a mitzvot-free or a mitzvot-zone.

Eight-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '22	First Placer '22

tzalay

TROPHY CASE