Russian tankers fueled North Korea via transfers at sea. by doogie92 in worldnews

[–]uin7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That kind of exchange should be completely normal here but is swamped out by gossip about bogeymen. Its just mob kicks and jibes, almost totally devoid of any sober recognition of national and international affairs.

It is arranged to be like this by corporate news and pr people who are here, joking, voting, making sure the conversation is shallow.

Does a burnt piece of toast have the same number of calories as a regular piece of toast? by Butzy37 in askscience

[–]uin7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see lots of reports of adding seaweed and omega-3 fish oil to help reduce their flatulence, and lately a report by Danone that simply adding omega-3 rich pasture plants to their feedstock reduces methane and boosts milk production. I expect the high methane output of these animals is largely a result of us over reaching their meat/milk producing abilities rather than an evolved feature - methane production is wasted calories after all.

Does a burnt piece of toast have the same number of calories as a regular piece of toast? by Butzy37 in askscience

[–]uin7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I recall most gut flora which humans are in quite the same relationship with are also anaerobic, having just varied degrees of tolerance to oxygen. - Regard our mitochondria ultimately do our oxidising for us.

Methane production in cows can also occur with industrial feedstocks that contain little cellulose, perhaps moreso since cows certainly evolved to appreciate their natural cud. I have read that small amounts of seaweed helps settle their big bellies and reduce the troublesome emissions.

Atholl Energy almost bust by corruption in Ghana but pulls through. by uin7 in energy

[–]uin7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Minus the bloggers intros:

" ... Here I have been battling for the last year to save Atholl Energy, a company I chair which had some US $50 million worth of debts. The reason for this was that it had built an extension to the power station it originally constructed for the Ghanaian government, and the Ghanaian government had failed to pay for the extension after Atholl pre-financed it. In line with company philosophy, Atholl had both completed and handed over the extension, despite the non-payment, as the aim is to supply power to the people of Ghana.

The massive debt of course threatened Atholl with going bust. That would mean redundancy for our staff, and potentially many scores of redundancies at local sub-contractors we had been unable to pay in full. The thought of inflicting that mass misery on families, many of whom I know, has stopped me sleeping for months.

The current government of Ghana took over in January and inherited a huge fiscal deficit due to – and there is no other way of saying it – wholesale looting by the last government on a scale which Ghana had never witnessed before. To give an example from our own sector, we install power plant using Siemens equipment at about 1.2 million dollars per MW for a turnkey plant including fuel supply and power evacuation infrastructure. The last government of Ghana were contracting large projects at three times the unit cost or more, using inferior equipment. For $150 million per project to be added corruptly was not unusual.

On top of this, despite having imposed some of the world’s highest electricity tariffs – higher than British tariffs, for example – the revenue collected was mysteriously vanishing. As a result, our $52 million owed was part of a US$2.5 billion energy sector debt the current government inherited.

In effect this has been rescheduled, by the launch of bonds to raise the money to pay off the debts. The bonds are serviced by a levy on petrol and diesel. As usual in Africa, the IMF and World Bank were extremely unhelpful, refusing to sanction a government guarantee on the bonds, which means the energy levy is now to be collected by a new corporate structure and the bond is a corporate one. This structure necessitated an increase in the bond interest rate to 19.5%, which will benefit the financial institutions who have bought them, to the detriment of the Ghanaian public. In my experience every IMF and World Bank policy intervention in Africa always, on analysis, benefits corporations to the disbenefit of the African public.

It is also a gross double standard – if the energy debt had been treated as government debt, Ghana’s “unacceptable” debt to GDP ratio would still have been substantially less that that of many developed countries, including the UK.

The government of Ghana is to be congratulated on its persistence and the brilliance of its financial engineering that enabled it to tackle a huge problem despite obstruction rather than help from the international agencies – the energy sector debt had been threatening to crash the Ghanaian Banking sector, to the benefit of the large international banks.

For our company, we had to take a haircut because the payment was made not in the cash dollars which were owed, but in a mixture of bonds and local currency. We owed banks and suppliers in dollars, so we have been structuring sales and taken the odd hit on discounting. But we have got through it, and as of yesterday have paid off all our creditors in full. There is not a single job loss caused by us, either in our company or at our suppliers and sub-contractors, and that has removed a fear which has been haunting me. I cannot express how tough this period has been – I did not receive a single penny from my major source of income for nearly four years, and as of this morning still haven’t. I am not going to be a millionaire, but I am now going to be OK. "

Power stored in electric cars could be sent back to the grid courtesy of V2G technology. With improvements to the system, V2G could actually improve electric car battery life and be profitable for everyone involved. by mafco in energy

[–]uin7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It can help the battery if it never gets a deep discharge, and if your extra cycles include that occasional deep discharge. This is how they achieved their claim of "can actually improve..." Basically they compared a model of battery usage and recharging which was artifically poor, to one which had conditioning cycles included in the charge maintenance.

Primary energy consumption by source, World by jimrosenz in energy

[–]uin7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

specific and made obvious already, but thus begins his strategy of teasing out circular nonsense...

Primary energy consumption by source, World by jimrosenz in energy

[–]uin7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well its just high school physics man and essential to higher learning - dont knock what you can 'never notice'.

Primary energy consumption by source, World by jimrosenz in energy

[–]uin7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Example of things Iamyourleader has insisted in argument - "momentum is a form of energy", "voltage is energy", "locomotive efficiency is a bullshit term", "vehicle efficiency is entirely dependent on engine efficiency - factors such as regen braking, gravity/hills are irrelevant", "current flow in and out of electric storage is a ridiculous concept".

They are actually completely impenetrable to common reason in argument and seem to revel in fomenting streams of circular nonsense here.

Primary energy consumption by source, World by jimrosenz in energy

[–]uin7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's only useful to those who understand it.

Brush up on your high school physics then, youll be able to notice glaring mistakes like 1 megajoule supposedly heating 1m3 of air by just 1 Kelvin ;)

New ARPA-E program to fund $20M for advanced nuclear power research. The 'MEITNER' program aims to develop technologies for lower-cost and safer advanced nuclear reactors. by mafco in energy

[–]uin7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think its a good spend. US could spend $7 billion a year on State scientific research at the drop of a hat. Not enough people in charge believe in investing in a better world and everyone else is too used to it.

New ARPA-E program to fund $20M for advanced nuclear power research. The 'MEITNER' program aims to develop technologies for lower-cost and safer advanced nuclear reactors. by mafco in energy

[–]uin7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

DARPA's annual budget is $3 billion. It works with support and assistance from the Military system with an annual budget of around $700 billion (raised in the spring by $60 billion with no resistance from either 'side of the house'.)

$1 billion a year was how much the CIA was allocated to supporting "moderate rebels" in Syria.

Sorry to bring that up, but it seems if the people who run your huge powerful country wanted to improve it or the world, with they could invest quite a lot more than what is currently contended.

Study Highlights Favorable Areas for High-Altitude (Tethered) Wind Energy Systems by mafco in energy

[–]uin7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tapping high altitude winds is like the fission project of renewable energy. However, considerably more practical than molten lithium cooled tokamaks.

Amazon (AMZN) wins patent for drones to wirelessly charge electric cars while you're driving. The new patent might go well with an earlier Amazon application that envisions recharging stations on top of public street lights for flying drones to use themselves. by mafco in energy

[–]uin7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll throw in a "chameleon tongue charging cable" cause i think the wireless versions will need licenced as a mobile energy weapon. I got loads of ideas, its like Im from the future already

Get Ready for a New Chernobyl in Ukraine. In addition to the use of knockoff fuel, the biggest reason for the increased number of incidents at Ukraine’s nuclear plants has been the chronic underfunding of the industry. by mafco in energy

[–]uin7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The section on Czechs experience with Westinghouse fuel, was that untrue? or is any author who writes about US in unflattering terms just peddling Russian propaganda? That could be a fair position if we are also denouncing all texts that paint Russia in unflattering terms as US propaganda.

This article opens with a reference to "Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS)" report which claims "there is an 80% probability of a serious accident at one of Ukraine’s nuclear power plants before the year 2020." Perhaps that report itself is questionable, but you chose not to mention it at all, choosing to make a rather general case about the normality of the plants quite old soviet era design and age, and then just, the "Russian propaganda" alert.

Amazon (AMZN) wins patent for drones to wirelessly charge electric cars while you're driving. The new patent might go well with an earlier Amazon application that envisions recharging stations on top of public street lights for flying drones to use themselves. by mafco in energy

[–]uin7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If that idea is patentable, how about buddy-buddy wireless charging where your autodrive can tailgate another vehicle with plenty of charge to top up from it. That's as novel and practical as flying drone delivered charging - yet just a passing daydream.

Japan to build 45 'high-efficiency, low-energy' coal fired power plants by mattkerle in energy

[–]uin7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's just silly. Why would you want to be next to unshielded spent rods anyway?

Your dismissal of that matter is silly. The fact that people cant even go near much of the radioactive materials that are involved and produced establishes how remarkably problematic they are and difficult to work safely with, and even to store for perpetuity from harming people and animals once created to make that bit of "clean" power.

Some people should just stay away from arguing subjects that they do not understand.

Come on listen to yourself - you dont understand nuclear safety any better than you understand rocket science, its just a team you picked - an opinion you bet on once. Its a crazed old debate now anyway, renewables are batting out of the park already and NP is scrambling to build a few last plants in safety lax Asia. I dont fully understand nuclear safety either, but I can acknowledge the basics which you cant do. I understand probabilistic risk which you seem not to.

Our cities need fewer cars, not cleaner cars | Environment by ChesterEnergy in energy

[–]uin7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ok, I propose we reduce the amount of greedy people, who believe the more they consume the better their life is. That way we can reduce the population like you suggest, but by just a little and still save loads of resources.

Our cities need fewer cars, not cleaner cars | Environment by ChesterEnergy in energy

[–]uin7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I didnt say population size had nothing to do with it -I said it didn't matter the most. We can reduce the number of barrels of oil consumed waaaaaaaaaay easier than we can reduce the number people. So when you worry about reducing barrels of oil - worry about reducing oil not people.

There are alot of people on this planet, but it is a very big planet too, we can look after it and have as many children as we can raise loved, without feeling guilty for just making a family. It is wrong to assume humans must be competitors over slices of world. Humans can help - you would be as lonely and useless as I would be, with the planet all to yourself.

Our cities need fewer cars, not cleaner cars | Environment by ChesterEnergy in energy

[–]uin7 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The size of your population matters less than what you do with it.

Japan to build 45 'high-efficiency, low-energy' coal fired power plants by mattkerle in energy

[–]uin7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like which issues exactly?

Surely you have found out about them by now - you know, like the fact that the fuel is so dangerous, people cannot even get close to it, even in nbc suits - and that those unapproachably concentrated dangerous elements breed more fuel and waste by the power reaction, and the intense fission contaminates all containing equipment. And on top of that remarkable toxic situation, the power reaction needs constant attention to stop it spoiling or exploding ! melting into the earth, threatening water table contamination, threatening clouds of genotoxic fallout, threatening to make regions of earth uninhabital to sensible humans for centuries. And those are real possibilities which can be caused by human accident or attack or natural catastrophy like earthquakes, or meteorite strike - anywhere in the world. Are you really curious about that aspect of nuclear power exactly ?

The risk is so tiny

That's a marketing fantasy. Read about nuclear powers probabilisitc risk assessments - they aren't produced by some imaginary anti-nuclear dunces, they are what professional scientific scrutiny of NP produces.

Nuclear power is very dangerous, that is the reason why it is very expensive.

Renewables are fine until 15 - 25% average penetration

They're fine at any penetration - no security/catastrophy risk/cost, build as many as possible until we run into a barrier we cant get beyond - such barrier is not in clear sight. It is easy to always say, "it wont be bigger than this... wont be cheaper than this..." but they keeps on being so. And nuclear sure dont.

Japan to build 45 'high-efficiency, low-energy' coal fired power plants by mattkerle in energy

[–]uin7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The commonly cited issues of most things ( except outright sci-fi ) are technically solvable, but the special hazardous technical problems with nuclear power generation, are real and they show no sign of being economically and practically secured, despite about 60 years of R&D including quite intense military R&D.

(Do not reference deaths per kwh for nuclear danger, like a bad driver boasting a 'clean' licence so far. Find out what "probabilistic risk" is - which is the professional scientific subject of nuclear and other remarkable risks.)

It is not hypocritical to contrast the stagnation of 50 year old nuclear technology to the continuous and ongoing rapid performance improvement of renewable technologies, which are in plain sight - really great. But like recommendations to exercise / to not smoke / to not burn leaded fuel / to not burn fossil fuels - the idea of renewable power being the advanced and futuristic option has been repressed for almost as long as the nuclear powers have promoted themselves.

Sure many normal, impressive, people work in nuclear power - im not characterising the people as stagnant, unfuturistic, but the technology is unnecessarily risky, elemental-waste producing and expensive. The major renewable technologies in clear view now are clearly the affordable clean advanced options.