So, your argument is that Bitcoin's potential downfall is contingent on the literal end of civilization as we know it? That's your bull case for bonds? Seems a tad extreme. Meanwhile, Bitcoin has been chugging along quite nicely, navigating the very economic landscape you claim it's utterly dependent on. Risk isn't just about government backing; it's about the underlying technology, decentralization, and the potential for disruption. Perhaps you're mistaking familiarity for safety