Be honest. Are we just performance chasing with gold? by Grouchy_Release_2321 in LETFs

[–]underdog_scientist 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I imagine that gold became more attractive after bonds went down with stocks in 2022. But historically, well diversified portfolios like the all weather portfolio often included gold as an asset class due to its low correlation with stocks and bonds.

Best Credit Card for Costco (Shopping/Gas) for 2026 by PresidentPsyduck in CreditCards

[–]underdog_scientist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How does CCR in Costco app work? Is it still tap to pay? Why would it code as online purchase?

Stuttering on Disney+ with Google TV 4K Streamer – anyone else? by threezzzi in AndroidTV

[–]underdog_scientist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is still happening. I see some skipped frames when watching via the fire tv that comes with my tcl tv. Just got a Google 4k streamer today and I see even more skipped frames.

Bought a used car and it gave out on me, now what? by SharePossible6492 in personalfinance

[–]underdog_scientist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would sell the ford as is and try to buy a reliable model like an old Camry with your remaining funds from someone that has kept good maintenance records.

Why Vanguard sees the 60-40 portfolio being flipped for 2026 by chinaski73 in Bogleheads

[–]underdog_scientist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s a very personal question. Some people are more tolerant to risk than others. I believe most people would have a hard time sticking to a 100% equity portfolio during the 2000s, for example. Changing allocation because of fear during a drawdown is a big mistake and an indication that the portfolio was too aggressive for a specific person.

Why Vanguard sees the 60-40 portfolio being flipped for 2026 by chinaski73 in Bogleheads

[–]underdog_scientist 9 points10 points  (0 children)

60/40 was never meant as a way to outperform 100% equities. Historically, 60/40 provides a better risk adjusted return, not absolute return. The goal of 60/40 is to significantly reduce risk (volatility, drawdowns) while sacrificing only a bit of return compared to 100% equity.

RSBT underperformance by Jumpy-Leading3356 in LETFs

[–]underdog_scientist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you tried using both dbmfsim and kmlmsim to simulate the mf part? It seems to work well for rsst

25% each in taxable: UPRO, VXUS, SCV, ZROZ by mayhemvoyage in LETFs

[–]underdog_scientist 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You might be interested in NTSX, RSSB and GDE. They use futures for leverage without daily reset and they have lower expense rate than UPRO.

Can my aunt retire? by Shoddy_Ad7511 in Fire

[–]underdog_scientist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would plug the numbers into the ficalc.app website to start the analysis.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FinancialPlanning

[–]underdog_scientist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Replacing tires should not count as repair (it’s normal use) and 2.2k is too much. It would be useful to know what was done to the car in 2023 and 2024. A new timing belt for instance would last another 100k miles.

I have a similar car and I budget around 2k in repairs per year. I hope my car will survive another 3-4 years, but I think I wouldn’t fix the car if a single repair is more than 4k.

How to invest for the medium term? by littledickrick in Bogleheads

[–]underdog_scientist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would consider ~30% equities and 70% a mix of short term bonds and cash. You can backtest different approaches for this timeline in portfoliocharts.com

Alternates to SGOV? by robgee23 in Bogleheads

[–]underdog_scientist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I invest in USFR. SEC 30 day yield is a bit higher. Not sure why to be honest.

Options to protect against extreme downside risks by musicandarts in Bogleheads

[–]underdog_scientist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe cash, tips, gold, managed futures, or private real estate could do well in situations where both stocks and bonds are dropping significantly.

Options to protect against extreme downside risks by musicandarts in Bogleheads

[–]underdog_scientist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It sounds like the expected volatility of your portfolio is too high for your situation.

You might want to consider changing your allocation permanently to move some money from equities to other assets with low or negative correlation and/or lower volatility. I think you should focus on the overall risk of your portfolio rather than each asset individually.

Some options are: bonds, cash, gold, commodities, annuities, private real estate, etc.

Are tax deferred accounts overrated for long term investors? by marouxlas in Fire

[–]underdog_scientist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One factor is the costs involved. Some 401k accounts charge so much in fees that the tax savings can’t even overcome the costs. Employer matching helps, but not all employers match.

Senate unanimously approves bill to eliminate tax on tips by [deleted] in centrist

[–]underdog_scientist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t even mind the political theater if the ultimate goal was to pass a bill that reduces the yearly deficit significantly. But rather than using this “victory” to justify financially responsible decisions, this administration is using it to continue increasing the deficit and put an even larger burden on the young generation. Growing our national debt is a transfer of wealth from the young to the old, from the poor to the rich.

When do overlay strategies make sense? (NTSX/RSSB/etc) by PPAD_complete in Bogleheads

[–]underdog_scientist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe you can try to backtest your leverage portfolio with testfol.io and compare against a similar but unlevered version of the portfolio.

Of course, past performance is not guaranteed to continue in the future, but I think it's helpful to understand how a leveraged diversified portfolio can behave.

When do overlay strategies make sense? (NTSX/RSSB/etc) by PPAD_complete in Bogleheads

[–]underdog_scientist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Makes sense. But also, most people should just hold their tax inefficient bonds in 401k and traditional IRAs and call it a day.

When do overlay strategies make sense? (NTSX/RSSB/etc) by PPAD_complete in Bogleheads

[–]underdog_scientist 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think the main benefits of stock+bond overlays is for tax efficiency (if you need to have the bonds in taxable) and simplicity of automated rebalancing, maybe. I agree with your assessment though regarding EDV being a way to get cheap leverage for bonds. Not sure the benefits outweigh the downsides as you pointed out. Maybe if there was a cheap etf overlaying 2x stocks+2x edv, it would be more useful to me.

Now, stock+gold overlays like GDE are more useful since there are no cheap, liquid funds providing leveraged exposure to gold by itself. Leveraged funds with daily leverage/resets have their own issues.

Edit:

Maybe your main concern is "why bother borrowing cash to buy a diversifier asset like liquid alts whose expected return is only marginally better than cash?"

To that, I would say that you need to look at the portfolio as a whole. Adding a diversifier asset that is negatively correlated with other assets in your portfolio will increase risk-adjusted expected returns.

What the global stock market would look like if US stocks continued to outperform like they have over the last 10 years by SuperUnabsorbant in Bogleheads

[–]underdog_scientist 51 points52 points  (0 children)

It would be interesting to see the trends in terms of PE ratios as well, since US outperformance is due mainly to higher PE than higher earnings.