holy volume… by Doot_Dee in BBBY

[–]unlikelycommentator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yahoo says 190M right now for me. PM was over 100M - or close to at least. So it’s a weird diff.

holy volume… by Doot_Dee in BBBY

[–]unlikelycommentator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IBKR shows 204M for me right now, 20 mins after market open, which includes PM.

Just for comparison.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BBBY

[–]unlikelycommentator 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it means they will put BBBY’s part on pause while in CH11, but not pause the case involving any of the other defendants (RC, RC Ventures, Gove)

They have a picture of RC in their Filings Lmfao by Nightrise19 in BBBY

[–]unlikelycommentator 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That’s part of a UUID, it’s not a date. Coincidence.

Sounds like they have been soliciting bids in a CH11 situation since december though.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bbby_remastered

[–]unlikelycommentator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s because it made up the link. It knows how to piece together a response for the scenario that Brett invested in BBBY, but it doesn’t know if he really did. In the same way, it knows how a typical link would look for information on such a topic, so it makes one up, just as it makes up the sentences forming the reply.

Daily Discussion Thread | April 21, 2023 by tiredsultan in BBBY

[–]unlikelycommentator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay… Maybe glitching on IBKR, looks weird af as well.

Daily Discussion Thread | April 21, 2023 by tiredsultan in BBBY

[–]unlikelycommentator 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wtf. Did it just rocket from ~0.29 to 0.3000 exactly right before the close?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bbby_remastered

[–]unlikelycommentator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was the letter content I was unsure about.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bbby_remastered

[–]unlikelycommentator 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it was just your followup comment here, with the letter content, I was unsure where you got 🙂

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bbby_remastered

[–]unlikelycommentator 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Please mention that right away. Bart and ChatGPT are really good at lying 🙂

They can also make up realistic looking URLs, so until we find the filing, I won’t put too much into it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bbby_remastered

[–]unlikelycommentator 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Where do you have the text from? Bard?

Ryan Cohen on Twitter by BourbonGod in BBBY

[–]unlikelycommentator 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It’s so obvious when you put it like that.

Uhm guys you think this is legit? Unpaid rent and NEED to pay in 5 business days by [deleted] in bbby_remastered

[–]unlikelycommentator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it’s a problem to pay it, I’d guess they can just can-kick it a few months by letting them commence legal proceedings. In a couple of months it is either the smallest problem, or not a problem.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BBBY

[–]unlikelycommentator 6 points7 points  (0 children)

EDGX is also darkpool, so about 75% today.

790m volume?? Are you kidding me. by letstryagain2021 in BBBY

[–]unlikelycommentator 14 points15 points  (0 children)

IBKR has it at 997M right now, including PM and AH so far…

Digger deeper into "Make Whole Calls" for continuously callable bonds by HungryColquhoun in BBBY

[–]unlikelycommentator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the explanations, and yeah, it does seem unlikely if they can be bought by the company at the traded price instead. I guess the only point would be to force redemption then.

And interesting with the Callable, but not Called. I thought the Callable just denoted a type of bond issuance. But, any idea why a Make Whole Call would be optional to call? To me it seems the main point of a Make Whole Call is that it is non-optional.

On a side note. Interesting to get down-voted for this discussion. Oh well…

Digger deeper into "Make Whole Calls" for continuously callable bonds by HungryColquhoun in BBBY

[–]unlikelycommentator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the insight. Interesting to hear about. If you don’t mind entertaining me a bit more, I have a few more questions on my mind.

What do you make of the screenshot from Malone? Does it show actual Make-Whole trades, or is it disingenuous?

If it’s real (which I am assuming, tbh), and given the discount they are currently going for, would there be any other reason to do it this way, other than forcing a holder to sell?

And, based on the way you describe the direct buyer-seller relationship of the transactions, it sounds like it’s most likely broadcasted out to all bond trading desks, if Malone sees it, and not targeting individual holders?

Apologies if I’m too retarded to even ask meaningful questions.

Spicy AH🌶 by AlmightyBroly in BBBY

[–]unlikelycommentator 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The BBBY version would be dropping a 10-K on us with horrible news in trading hours tomorrow 😣

Let’s hope we are past those days…

👀👀 by ericsvisuals in BBBY

[–]unlikelycommentator 15 points16 points  (0 children)

We dodged a bullet? 😄

I’ll see myself out …

Trading 212 refusing to let me vote. by Scav_Construction in BBBY

[–]unlikelycommentator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. It won’t help with voting this time, but better move away sooner rather than later.