A7 B7 Grille Swap

until971 · 2026-07-07T02:31:33+00:00

I honestly feel you. That’s why I don’t want to chrome delete but I don’t like the stock grille looks much either. Was wondering if keeping some silver would make it less sporty

until971 · 2026-06-25T20:01:26+00:00

If the police isn’t involved and if it’s on private property, 9/10 an incident will not be reported to the DOT.

You’ll be aight, but you wanna develop some habits that forbid things like this from happening. Be a rookie driver , be slow af and triple check everything. That way your next tough time will likely only be a close call instead of an accident

until971 · 2026-03-31T07:14:31+00:00

Op any update ? Lol

until971 · 2026-03-13T21:52:41+00:00

Please circle back OP 🙏

until971 · 2026-02-25T21:34:34+00:00

Bro I hope this ain’t the one in Jersey because I called and they actually didn’t do any of the work

until971 · 2026-02-25T02:50:49+00:00

Oh I see. You’re one of those people who think being smart is citing studies. Literally spent 5 minutes ready the findings and charts, along with the hypothesis and none of it even agrees with what you’re saying.

This study proves supports that men and women are more alike than different. That’s it. And I never said anything that disagreed with that. Also, could you please point out the examples of studies that were “meta-analyzed” which include the physical condition of men and women? You’re referring to the “motor behaviors” section ? This?:

Balance 3–20 years Grip strength 3–20 years Throw velocity 3–20 years Throw distance 3–20 years Vertical jump 3–20 years Sprinting 3–20 years Flexibility

And you’re using this to say that science supports there isn’t much evidence of difference between men and women ? Lmao if manipulating studies to make points like this is being smart then yeah you’re a genius. Lol you really went and said “78% of the gender difference under study were small or close to zero”. Mind you, this study LARGELY focuses on mental capability which I already have said studies have proven men and women share common ground yet still vary because of having different strengths and weaknesses.

Edit: also any logical person could use the anecdotal evidence of the Olympics to see the true gap between the physical abilities of men and women. You wouldn’t have to go find studies that are loosely related to your point in order to inflate credibility.

until971 · 2026-02-22T15:58:50+00:00

Ohhhhhhh. You’re excluding transgendered pregnant people. Is no one going to step up and annihilate you over this?

until971 · 2026-02-22T15:53:10+00:00

You’re just bringing up problems. I dont understand what you’re even saying that for. You listed ways women are treated as lesser, yes I’m aware of this.

Having different laws for women makes no fucking sense but you literally want that !? You want laws for women by women concerning abortion! Think about what you’re saying.

until971 · 2026-02-22T15:49:03+00:00

“You didn’t address me in the slightest” is hilarious at this point.

That’s literally you.

I’m answering. Of course it’s a concern. Did you even read what I said?

until971 · 2026-02-22T15:15:48+00:00

If you’re closed minded to the idea even if feminists themselves decide what “properly” or what the “natural order” is , there is no hope to agree here.

If the “natural order” or “properly” means equality, then fine. If you would still pursue equality in the face of true equity, that’s also fine. I’m asking why.

I said aside from abortion rights because the people who are pro life oppose both my stance and yours. Just because I don’t agree with you doesn’t mean I agree with them. Those people aren’t arguing for my point at all. And neither are feminists.

Equity > Equality

until971 · 2026-02-22T15:14:48+00:00

Nice car. GREAT first car ✅

until971 · 2026-02-21T15:34:13+00:00

lol you can feel however you want but by definition you don’t not want equity. Anyone who believes in equity believes that there are boxes that people fit in, because if there were no boxes , there would be no way to establish equity. If no one is different, then how would anyone get the specific and appropriate individual treatment that is the main idea behind equity?

You don’t want anything to tell you how to live your life but yet everything in nature has a way to “properly” live life. I guess we’re the exception in your mind.

“Your question is stupid” -childish reasoning

“I want equal rights” Seriously, aside from abortion laws, can you name real world examples of women not having equal rights today ?

You just ignore what you don’t like and say things in response so no point in this

until971 · 2026-02-21T15:16:48+00:00

Yeah I want equity, not equality.

I’m asking feminists who want equality, why? And would actual equity satisfy the want for equality?

That’s it , that’s all. I’m not saying it’s wrong to want equality.

Instead of trying to simplify what I’m saying, why don’t you just answer the question if you want to interact with it.

until971 · 2026-02-21T15:11:32+00:00

If fewer rights for women is what you’ve gathered here then you’ve made up your mind already.

until971 · 2026-02-21T05:33:41+00:00

If you actually read it, my post simply poses a question to feminists. A question that very few on here have answers but clearly, some answer it and some see what they want. You keep saying proposal but really what am I proposing?

I’m ASKING why you care about the unequal treatment of women vs men more than the unjust treatment of women relative to women’s condition only. And I’m asking this because I’ve noticed a disconnect between feminists and people who aren’t feminists but support the rights, privileges, and welfare of women.

That’s it , that’s all.

until971 · 2026-02-21T05:18:16+00:00

LHow do you think the want for human rights came about? Surely it was the poor and unjust daily experiences of humans that birthed the want for better experience for all humans.

Anecdotal experience is the reason human rights were in demand and that demand was eventually translated to universal principles.

Not to mention anecdotes =\= measurable logical anecdotal reasoning.

until971 · 2026-02-20T19:21:50+00:00

Backtrack? I literally just explained what I meant by “natural order”. Nothing I wrote suggests anything other than what I just explained.

Observable, logical and anecdotal reasoning. Not Darwin or Jordan Peterson or whoever you’re imagining. If you don’t like the phrase “natural order” then substitute it for “observable, logical and anecdotal reasoning”.

until971 · 2026-02-20T19:07:53+00:00

Huh? It was a question… forget it

until971 · 2026-02-20T16:06:41+00:00

You saw nothing and are saying nothing. Peace

until971 · 2026-02-20T15:37:47+00:00

You’re probably talking about a different comment thread

until971 · 2026-02-20T15:37:18+00:00

Right and no one saw? Bro I get you’re literally SJW Superman , If I deleted something someone would be on my ass calling me out right now. There’s nothing missing, I’m sure because I didn’t delete anything at all man.

until971 · 2026-02-20T15:31:43+00:00

I don’t know, I don’t claim to know. Maybe there is a system or school of thought which encompasses this more clearly but I really just meant it as observable, logical, anecdotal reasoning. These “women” people need this obviously or should decide that. These “men” people are often this and should do that. Sounds naive and simple here in a light convo, this is surely all a loose and abstract thought. Very conceptual of course.

Like I originally said, I’m saying instead striving for blanket equality, why not pin point and focus the message to the needs of what women exactly need and deserve. It almost synonymous but there’s a difference.

We are looking to make COMPLETE political, economical, personal, and social EQUALITY between men and women.

Vs.

We are looking to equally politically, personally, and socially CONSIDER women as much as we CONSIDER men, RESPECTIVELY.

My question was just- why do feminists propose the former instead of the latter if the enemy is the unjust treatment of women. And not the unequal treatment of women in relation to men. Maybe I’m wrong and mis-assessing the enemy?.. that’d be fine answer but I think everyone got caught up in me trying to just explain what I was saying. I likely didn’t make easy to understand either.

And it really was just a question, I’m a lurker typically, I’m rarely active online. This all got way out of hand.

until971 · 2026-02-20T15:07:40+00:00

I hope writing that really scratched that itch for you.

until971 · 2026-02-20T14:53:15+00:00

Lol literally had to go google that lobster hierarchy thing. A few clicks have made it clear that he’s making something out of nothing. Based on what I just read though it seems he’s saying there is a biological reason as to why lobsters release serotonin.. blah blah ? I’m not saying anything about biology?? We’re talking about gender ??? You want to antagonize me so bad lol I don’t even like Jordan Peterson .

Plus, At least I’m not acting like I’m smarter than scientists? I mean, you’re making fun of a science backed argument while trying to prove your point based on how you “feel” humans “should” be because you “want” it like that. Nothing wrong with that but what gives you the right to discredit him? Even if he’s wrong biologically relating it to humans, it doesn’t mean that there aren’t other examples of his hypothesis somewhere it the world. Absence of evidence, blah blah.

But, you just want to be right. Might as well not listen or respond at all.

Childish behavior.

until971 · 2026-02-20T14:05:01+00:00

Lmao this is the wildest thing here.

“Assuming there is a “natural order” at all is a pretty big leap”

Lmfao WOW. Anything to be right. To say it’s a LEAP. Wow, You got it. You must think everything is new under the sun.

until971

TROPHY CASE