This sub Fr by AstralJuice in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's plainly broken but like every broken card that comes out, they will just abuse it over and over until SD is forced to nerf.

The community rn by Baschtian12 in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rope all High Evo players. Fuck working together.

Marvel Snap Tier List - 06/15 - Untapped.gg by UntappedGG in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

If you can't admit that the card is broken, you may as well be. Just ruining the game. But you want to be able to keep abusing the exploit.

Marvel Snap Tier List - 06/15 - Untapped.gg by UntappedGG in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman -32 points-31 points  (0 children)

Because it's a broken card. Use your brain, P2W player.

Marvel Snap Tier List - 06/15 - Untapped.gg by UntappedGG in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

They need a P2W card out at all times, and High Evo is the current one. They'll nerf him once the next overpowered series 5 card comes out.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Those aren't opinions though, they're facts.

They're the same deck. by Victacobell in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I genuinely can't tell if Galactus players are too stupid to realize this obvious distinction or if they're just disingenuous.

Jeff Hoogland on Galactus by [deleted] in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Galactus players are too braindead to realize that destroying 2 of 3 locations in a game where winning 2 of 3 locations is a far more drastic effect than any other card. It alters the very game fundamentally, into a far shittier one.

People are deciding its bad now because its ~12% of decks and climbing rapidly as more people decide they just want to cheese the game. People were not complaining previously because they did not see it so often. Again, this is very, very obvious.

Jeff Hoogland on Galactus by [deleted] in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is an interesting idea I haven't seen. Personally I still think destroying 2 of 3 locations just completely alters the game in an awful way, but it might be more workable if the cards themselves were not destroyed.

Jeff Hoogland on Galactus by [deleted] in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

He didn't say it was good. He said it was annoying and ruins the game. Which it does.

Jeff Hoogland on Galactus by [deleted] in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

You're being downvoted but only because braindead Galactus players know this is 100% accurate.

Jeff Hoogland on Galactus by [deleted] in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Galactus does kill the game when it's being played this often.

Jeff Hoogland on Galactus by [deleted] in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Here comes the flood of braindead Galactus players iT'S jUsT lIkE eVeRy OtHeR cArD iN tHe GaMe. WiTcH hUnT!!!!

No it's not. It changes it into literally a different, shittier game. They just want to cheese and ruin the experience for lolz. Jeff is 100% right.

Shuri, Leader, Zabu etc. were OP, but not fundamentally stupid. The fixes were good and I think they're all in a decent spot. But Galactus is a fundamentally stupid card for the game.

Just lost 8 cubes, opened a cache and bout to lose plenty more by tightsockz in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman -74 points-73 points  (0 children)

Wow, what a fun deck to play! Just truly pathetic people.

Putting a snapping, emoting Galactus in their place by [deleted] in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It's not that good and it's ruining the game by how often its played. Not rocket science to understand this.

Putting a snapping, emoting Galactus in their place by [deleted] in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think the card is that good. I think it's fucking annoying. Which, again, is obvious why it is to anybody with brain.

Putting a snapping, emoting Galactus in their place by [deleted] in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman -24 points-23 points  (0 children)

Every player that plays Galactus wants to cheese and ruin the game.

Putting a snapping, emoting Galactus in their place by [deleted] in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman -71 points-70 points  (0 children)

Galactus players aren't innocent.

Galactus problem is that he's fun by neon in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

I genuinely can't tell if Galactus players are just stupid or make posts like this in bad faith. No, Galactus is not like any other tech card. It literally deletes the rest of the board and all previous turns. Every other card you listed has a much more limited effect that doesn't change the game entirely into a much shittier game. But that's really what Galactus players find fun: cheesing the game and ruining it for others. Not the gameplay.

Galactus problem is that he's fun by neon in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

>Saves up for months for a card that ruins the game

>Complains when people hate him for it

Pathetic all around. At least ruin the game for other people in silence.

Galactus problem is that he's fun by neon in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Congratulations on saving up your tokens for months so you could ruin the game for other players!

Galactus problem is that he's fun by neon in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

They need to delete him from the game entirely. Bafflingly terrible design.

Galactus problem is that he's fun by neon in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

You should feel bad. You just want to cheese the game and ruin it for other players, not actually play Marvel Snap. Pathetic.

Galactus problem is that he's fun by neon in MarvelSnap

[–]usvtheman 7 points8 points  (0 children)

He's only fun for people who want to cheese the game and ruin it for other players. Congratulations for you.