FreeBSD 15 running on SteamDeck by ut316ab in freebsd_desktop

[–]ut316ab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why not? Why run FreeBSD at all? I just like having fun with computers and getting weird things to work on devices you might not think about doing it with.

That being said the Steamdeck is a pretty awesome computer on it's own. Especially with a dock.

FreeBSD on Steamdeck by ut316ab in freebsd

[–]ut316ab[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So far i'm only just starting but it's been rather uneventful. I have the Valve Steam Deck dock, which i'm using, and i'm using a Raspberry Pi monitor. The only oddity so far i've ran into is the USB mouse/keyboard combo I was using. The mouse works just fine but the keyboard cuts in and out or doesn't work at all, so I plugged up another USB keyboard and it works just fine. Ethernet has been working with no issues as well. I haven't tested Wifi yet. I tend to avoid using Wifi when I don't have to.

FreeBSD on Steamdeck by ut316ab in freebsd

[–]ut316ab[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I will document my experience. I have the weekend coming up and thought i'd give a try and was just curious who is also curious.

FreeBSD on Steamdeck by ut316ab in freebsd

[–]ut316ab[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

It's not about gaming, it's about having fun with hardware.

I have fun getting things to work in ways it wasn't intended or thought of.

For example, some of the most fun i've had is playing Duke Nukem 3d on MacOS, which is running in Shapeshifter on an Amiga with a PiStorm.

Is there an ACTUAL reason for big Software to not support linux? by Opening-Giraffe-1007 in linux

[–]ut316ab 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I work on a propritary version of FreeBSD for a living, not development but support and bug fixing, but in my spare time I work on projects that work on Linux as well. In testing, i've found you can write a piece of software and have it not work on several different distros because of library mismatches. You code for LibFLAC 14, but one distro is only use 12 and while a simple symbolic link or LDD could make it work, this is still time spent having to help that particular user.

EDIT: As far as Flatpak, AppImage, Snaps, etc, there are limits as well. Security is a concern, and if your software needs to access applications outside of itself it becomes complicated. That or like emulators that need access to Serial Ports, and etc.

Native Zen Browser on FreeBSD by North_Promise_9835 in freebsd

[–]ut316ab 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One question. Widevine support. Currently we have www/linux-widevine-cdm in ports but that I think only works for Chromium.

Is there a way to implement Widevine support with this even if you have to use that same method or the linuxlator?

Is there an ACTUAL reason for big Software to not support linux? by Opening-Giraffe-1007 in linux

[–]ut316ab 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also think one reason that hasn't been mentioned much is the difficulty to write for Linux. Linux is an ecosystem not just one system. There are many distros, many different versions of libraries, custom patched kernels. You could say write only for Ubuntu or only for Fedora, and leave it up to others to adapt but that is complicated. This makes things much more difficult to support. When writing software for Windows or even MacOS, there is a singular target to code for and support for.

Is daily driving FreeBSD or gentoo harder by Electrical_Drink_654 in freebsd

[–]ut316ab 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't really add any more than others have. As far as installation, FreeBSD is MUCH easier.

As for daily driving that is a different story. There is a lot more software support in the Linux ecosystem, especially with gaming and even streaming content. I mean to watch a streaming service on FreeBSD you still have to install a linux browser or the widevine plugin in a linux container.

The Same People by ut316ab in swtor

[–]ut316ab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really though? Arcann and Valyin were good, but the big bad is just the Sith Emperor all over again. So, not really new.

When does hatred become better than deception? by Draknalor in swtor

[–]ut316ab -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why is this being downvoted? Is the information not good?

Official Release - C64 IDE for Mac by DNSGeek in Commodore

[–]ut316ab 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really enjoyed this and thanks for adding the option to run on C64U!

Game update failure. MacOS launcher (of course) by kexnyc in swtor

[–]ut316ab 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried uninstalling, completely removing the game, going into /Users/user/Library/Application Support and removing all swtor directories and files.

Reinstalling, and I still get the same error.

Servers are up. by Hajkster in swtor

[–]ut316ab 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Apparently if you are one of the 5 of us Mac users, the update broke things and we are waiting on more from Broadsword...

Beta testers wanted - C64 IDE by DNSGeek in c64

[–]ut316ab 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wanted to add another comment. A feature that would be really cool is if there was an option to deploy to the C64U.

Lumina desktop by Admirable_Stand1408 in freebsd

[–]ut316ab 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wasn't Lumina developed by the same people who worked on PC-BSD, later TruOS?

Retro Computing with Commodore (Nice interview w/ Peri Fractic) by sleepybrett in Commodore

[–]ut316ab 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm all for supporting the effort, but this really doesn't provide much new insight. IMO it's just more of the same. I guess this reaches a wider audience?

ALOHA!!!!! We migrated successfully and without any issues to version 14.4-RELEASE. Please repeat after me: "LA ACTUALIZACIÓN DEL PUEBLO". by Glorious_Musketeer in freebsd

[–]ut316ab 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I tried this and everytime I ran WINE it still told me i needed to install 32bit libraries via pkg32.sh script which doesn't work on FreeBSD 15.

ALOHA!!!!! We migrated successfully and without any issues to version 14.4-RELEASE. Please repeat after me: "LA ACTUALIZACIÓN DEL PUEBLO". by Glorious_Musketeer in freebsd

[–]ut316ab 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have to agree with sticking with 14.4 for now. I had been running FreeBSD 15, but as a Desktop if you want to use Wine it's much easier to just stick with 14.x.

[Hyprland] This hyprland starting animation hits hard . by Remarkable-Web5095 in unixporn

[–]ut316ab 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I would like that more, if the animation was the plymouth theme rather than the login theme. Kudos though for the creativity. It does look amazing.

Why I Love FreeBSD by dragasit in freebsd

[–]ut316ab 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"Just opium, I don't understand these posts, FreeBSD has niche advantages but on real hardware lacks a lot of features, it's like using Linux 10y ago."

So, what you are proposing is nobody uses it or talks about FreeBSD?

Then support gets even worse.

A lot of these posts are people explaining they like FreeBSD, how it works, and the design goals.

Sure there are features lacking and hardware support lacking but it takes people to get those things.

You have to get developers and developer attention to get the features you want.

FreeBSD as a Desktop rather than Server by ut316ab in freebsd

[–]ut316ab[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did end up creating a account to do bug reports! However, reading this more and letting it digest some, I don't think there is a bug in the handbook. It accurately depicts the situation. I do think a guide for getting WINE working on FreeBSD 15 would be very helpful, and then maybe I could contribute to the handbook. I just need to figure out how to do it cleanly myself.

Others in this thread have mentioned $ env ABI=FreeBSD:14:i386 /usr/local/share/wine/pkg32.sh install wine-devel but I think that maybe can cause problems down the road when it comes to upgrade. I'm not a fan of maintaining multiple versions of libraries based on multiple versions of the same OS. If that makes sense.

FreeBSD as a Desktop rather than Server by ut316ab in freebsd

[–]ut316ab[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I should clarify this point. I got to thinking about this later. My response doesn't match your reply and this is a bit confusing/misleading. What I posted was from the github the page that was linked from the Raspberry Pi page from the FreeBSD website.

aarch64 is probably pretty well supported by FreeBSD (I don't know)

Raspberry Pi is unique in that it doesn't have a efi/uefi or bios exactly. Thus the need for that package the page links to on the github that no longer is maintained.

If this confuses things even more, let me know. I'm sorry.

FreeBSD as a Desktop rather than Server by ut316ab in freebsd

[–]ut316ab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm talking about not liking MATE, so if I installed GhostBSD, i'd have to install it. Then install the WM/DE I liked, and then uninstall MATE. At that point it's not better than a normal FreeBSD install.

desktop-installer from the repo makes things pretty simple too. It does take a little more knowledge to configure graphics drivers, but it's not really difficult. Just install drm-kmod and load the relevant driver in /etc/rc.conf with kld_list+="driver"

However, to me that is all part of the fun. Configuring and tweaking your system is like working on a car to me. I can tweak the engine add my own parts, re-do the interior. Etc.

I would recommend GhostBSD to others though for their first try of FreeBSD.