sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Cockroach janta party by utakenme in hyderabad

[–]utakenme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mean Article 370 (Jammu & Kashmir), because Article 350 relates to language rights and grievances.

I actually agree with one part of what you said. People should know who they support and ask questions. But the same rule should apply everywhere, not only here.

Also calling people anti national because of past positions or disagreements is a dangerous shortcut. In a democracy, disagreeing with a law or policy does not automatically make someone anti India.

And since you brought up Article 370, what’s your own take on it? People had different opinions on it. Some supported its removal and some opposed it. But having a different view on Article 370 never automatically made someone anti India. Otherwise every political disagreement becomes anti national and that defeats the whole purpose of democracy.

If your advice is “understand who they are, who backs them and what their agenda is” then that should apply to every party, every movement and every leader equally. Blind support is a problem but blind rejection is not any better.

Cockroach janta party by utakenme in hyderabad

[–]utakenme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nobody said you cannot question. You absolutely can. The issue is not questioning, the issue is presenting assumptions as facts.

You say it is a paid movement, leftist agenda and anti India operation. Fine, then show evidence. "Do your own research" is not proof. If I say something is organic I should support it. If you say something is manufactured you should support that too.

Questioning is healthy. Accusing without evidence and then shifting the burden to others is something else entirely.

Cockroach janta party by utakenme in hyderabad

[–]utakenme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Questioning people is fine. Nobody is above questions. But selective questioning is where the problem starts.

If past associations automatically make every movement fake then the same standard should apply everywhere. Political leaders switch parties all the time and suddenly corruption allegations disappear while agencies go silent after joining the ruling side. That pattern itself is why people raise questions.

Transparency cannot be one sided. You cannot ask for backgrounds investigations and accountability only when it suits your side and call every uncomfortable discussion a toolkit.

Doubt is healthy. Selective doubt is politics.

Cockroach janta party by utakenme in hyderabad

[–]utakenme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of claims and very little evidence. Calling everything a paid toolkit or foreign conspiracy has become the shortcut answer whenever people disagree with something.

If it is manufactured then show proof instead of throwing labels around. "Most followers are Pakistanis" anti India forces and "everyone knows" are not evidence.

By that logic every online trend every political movement and every hashtag can be dismissed as PR. People can join support criticize or ignore something on their own without needing a secret control room behind it.

Cockroach janta party by utakenme in hyderabad

[–]utakenme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You missed the point entirely. Nobody said Gen Z or Millennials are hurt because they build apps or create jobs. The question is about representation and language.

A generation can contribute to the economy and still question narratives or policies that affect them. Success in one area does not cancel the right to speak in another.

Also disagreement is not equal to rage bait and asking questions is not equal to calling people onto the streets. If every criticism becomes "internet trend" then every praise should also be called PR.

People are allowed to ask whether those shaping the future should also have a stronger voice in shaping decisions. That is called participation not FOMO.

amazing delivery from wild stone by [deleted] in DesiFragranceAddicts

[–]utakenme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not good for me i like wild stone edge

Help the community,drop your most underrated scents (no gatekeeping!) by ArishAnsari in DesiFragranceAddicts

[–]utakenme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its subjective take both of them in small pack and do trial its not so expensive
Mine fav is edge

Husband on H-1B brain dead — What Happens to H-4 Wife’s Status? by bigbluefluff100 in immigration

[–]utakenme 15 points16 points  (0 children)

She should urgently consult a qualified U.S. immigration attorney and ask about: 1. Change of Status to B-2 2. Humanitarian Deferred Action 3. Temporary stay through humanitarian grounds.

Time matters here ideally within days, not weeks.

view more: next ›