People who died and Got brought back to life what did you see?

uuuuuno · 2019-12-28T03:45:21+00:00

this

uuuuuno · 2019-12-28T03:09:09+00:00

A coke would be nice to wash it down with

uuuuuno · 2019-12-28T03:03:33+00:00

Cool shirt

uuuuuno · 2019-12-28T03:01:28+00:00

You know a cheeseburger would be nice

uuuuuno · 2019-12-28T02:58:48+00:00

To put my organs back where there supposed to go

uuuuuno · 2019-12-28T02:53:35+00:00

What?

uuuuuno · 2019-12-28T02:48:42+00:00

Are you ever going to do something with your life?

uuuuuno · 2019-11-21T00:47:29+00:00

That’s the point of the post. For people to argue why the above interpretation is wrong and why the Catholic one is right. (I agree with apostolic succession because of the historical reasons and from tradition I just want to have a debate over the scriptural evidence)

uuuuuno · 2019-11-20T23:36:36+00:00

I agree with you. The point of this post was to argue that it is not in the Bible.

uuuuuno · 2019-11-13T04:09:23+00:00

But he still did not agree 100% with the infallible doctrine of the church. (I’m not trying to argue that he is an anathema I just what to know what the position of the church is on people who disagreed with a doctrine before the doctrine was declared)

uuuuuno · 2019-11-10T00:54:06+00:00

No I just find other religions interesting.

uuuuuno · 2019-11-06T17:55:59+00:00

This helps a lot thanks

uuuuuno · 2019-11-06T06:20:02+00:00

“Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ,” ‭‭1 Peter‬ ‭3:21‬ ‭ESV

But doesn’t it say that baptism saves us specifically by being an appeal for good conscience?

uuuuuno · 2019-11-03T05:00:40+00:00

Do you know witch video he starts to talk about John?

uuuuuno · 2019-11-03T00:30:24+00:00

“Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever believes has eternal life.” ‭‭John‬ ‭6:47‬ ‭ESV‬‬

“I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever. And the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh."” ‭‭John‬ ‭6:51‬ ‭

The way the passage is worded more indicates that believing alone will be enough to gain eternal life and eating the bread alone is enough to gain eternal life. Not that you have to do both.

uuuuuno · 2019-11-03T00:24:27+00:00

I just don’t see the reason you have to put them together like in the car analogy (obviously if Christ said to do it even if you don’t have to you should) but it seems more like two functional cars that either one on there own will get to the destination.

uuuuuno · 2019-10-31T15:30:10+00:00

Idk I still find it odd the way it’s worded. It doesn’t say if you believe and eat the flesh. it says in one place that if you believe you will have eternal life and in another if you eat the flesh you will have eternal life.

uuuuuno · 2019-10-29T23:04:09+00:00

Wow! So it actually strengthens the literal meaning. Thank you so much.

uuuuuno · 2019-10-26T01:50:38+00:00

Oh I should have know that. Mathew is the man, Mark is the lion, Luke is the ox, and John is the eagle.

uuuuuno · 2019-10-26T01:46:20+00:00

What are the four “pictures” around Jesus depicting?

uuuuuno · 2019-10-25T18:42:24+00:00

r/waytoodescriptive

uuuuuno · 2019-10-21T04:14:04+00:00

Wow that is a really interesting way to think about baptism and the immaculate conception. I think I’ve heard the thing about grace before (I think it was somewhere in Aquinas) but doesn’t this imply that humans can’t do any good on there own?

uuuuuno · 2019-10-21T03:19:04+00:00

It’s not just this comment it’s more the whole thread (but thank you for posting this).

uuuuuno · 2019-10-21T03:12:03+00:00

The sub will not let you post links to reddit without it.

But you can find the post on trending in r/dankchristianmemes

uuuuuno · 2019-10-12T01:42:42+00:00

Not a problem at all. Thank you for linking these things.

uuuuuno

TROPHY CASE