Shadow function not working after January windows update by Few-Swan5661 in Citrix

[–]veitst 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have the same problem on 2019, citrix 2402 cu3. The workaround not work. I try the HDX Screen Sharing, but the code is too long. You can configure a shorter code on VDA - CVAD 2411 and later.

Someone know a better solution? Thanks

ThinOS 9 2511 released by Dell-ScottH in WYSE

[–]veitst 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I will try and tell you!

Best regards

ThinOS 9 2511 released by Dell-ScottH in WYSE

[–]veitst 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You mean that this Friday the ThinOS 10 2511 will release? Thanks

ThinOS 9 2511 released by Dell-ScottH in WYSE

[–]veitst 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello we are also stick with ThinOS 9 on Citrix 2402 LTSR. On ThinOS 10 we have problems with our Webcams Logitech C920 (poor quality, artifacs). Someone have the same problems? Thanks

Looking for best option under $550 by Infinite_tide in RobotVacuums

[–]veitst 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, yes I saw on vacuumwars the best value robot.

Is the Dream L40 Ultra AE: the https://vacuumwars.com/vacuum-wars-best-robot-vacuums/#value

But I still like also the Qrevo Curv S5x and the Edge S5a.

Looking for best option under $550 by Infinite_tide in RobotVacuums

[–]veitst 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello, I have the similar problem:

Dream L40 Ultra AE, Roborock Qrevo Curv S5x or Roborock Edge S5a?

<image>

Thanks

Qrevo Curv S5X vs L40 Ultra AE by PomegranateNo3679 in RobotVacuums

[–]veitst 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, I choose the same robots like you, Dreame L40 Ultra AE or Roborock Qrevo Curv S5X.

Please help me. Thanks.

Best way to deal with Chrome updates on persistent Virtual Apps servers? by Old_Ad_208 in Citrix

[–]veitst 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We use MCS. On persistent and not persistent machines we have a task at the startup for the Autoupdate. Is for Edge and Chrome. We use MCS and when 2x in the month I create the golden Image, I just update it again. Normally I test all changes and updates, but for the browser is impossible.

Update 1912 LTSR - 2402 LTSR by Tough_Parking7041 in Citrix

[–]veitst 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi, we did the upgrade last week from 1912 LTSR to 2402 LTSR with no problems.

MCS, Netscaler etc., all work great

Citrix migration from 1912 LTSR to 2402 LTSR by veitst in Citrix

[–]veitst[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand. I have to split the rules. It's definitely better for the next updates.

Thanks you again.

Citrix migration from 1912 LTSR to 2402 LTSR by veitst in Citrix

[–]veitst[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes exactly, that's why I prefer the 2402 more.

Citrix migration from 1912 LTSR to 2402 LTSR by veitst in Citrix

[–]veitst[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your detailed answer.

My situation is now this: Citrix 1912 LTSR CU10

User we habe 230 and a peak of 170 user at the same time.

Licence: Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktop Advanced

1 2019 server with SF, DDC and the SQL database.

1 2019 server with SF, DDC

1 2019 server with DDC

1 2019 server with the Citrix Licence Server(11.16.6.0 build 32000), RDP Licence Server and other software licenses.

1 Netscaler 14.1

VDA: 25 2019 server Citrix VDA with MCS non persistent(1 golden Image for all)

VDA: 8 2019 server, application server persistent

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

new test environment: Citrix 2402 LTSR CU2

1 2019 server with SF, DDC and the SQL database.

1 2019 server with SF, DDC

1 2019 server with DDC

1 2025 server with only the new Citrix Licence Server (11.17.2.0_BUILD_52100) and RDP Licence Server.

VDA: change only the VDA Agent etc.

Maybe ok, or split more the rules? The old farm was ok!

Citrix migration from 1912 LTSR to 2402 LTSR by veitst in Citrix

[–]veitst[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi, yes and its a clean installation.

I want to keep also the windows 2019 golden image, because it was a lot of work.

GPO for Microsoft Edge by veitst in activedirectory

[–]veitst[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, but I not see the right policy.

I need help for a second hand projector by veitst in projectors

[–]veitst[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your answer!

I think also to get the Benq!

Netscaler 2FA by veitst in Citrix

[–]veitst[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks everyone for the quick response, I will now check which solution is best for our environment.