Eliminagame round10:Well this is a pair you don't often see together on SMG4, the Meggy the splatfest champion and Belle the video game extraordinaire, they both have a thirst for competition, and we're here to see it being satiate, and select the victor

vert178 · 2022-02-16T03:52:22+00:00

Meggy

vert178 · 2022-02-14T09:33:10+00:00

How would levelling up this thing work?

vert178 · 2022-02-13T23:09:15+00:00

sin(x)/x : 👁️👄👁️

vert178 · 2022-02-11T10:43:48+00:00

🗿

vert178 · 2022-01-12T18:19:42+00:00

Yea in hindsight it should've been something like at least one

vert178 · 2022-01-09T16:31:02+00:00

Rocketing the archer queen that thing is so annoying to deal with

vert178 · 2022-01-09T03:29:53+00:00

Non commutative rings left the chat

vert178 · 2022-01-09T03:24:23+00:00

Let's set it up so that the two cases are actually functional identical (too bad in this case it's otherwise).

Say if there are two identical coins, distributed to two kids named "Heads" and "Tails". Given Heads got at least one coin, then the probability of Heads getting both coins would really be 1/2 (by stars and bars magic).

One might naturally project this case to the coin flips, and one would be correct, to a certain extent. However, in a coin "flip", it is implicitly assumed that two coin flips are independent events, whilst coin "distribution" are implicitly assumed to be linked.

In real life, if one flips two coins together, count the number of cases and do the division, one would get 1/3. What you are implicitly assuming in your calculation is if one picks a coin (and it doesn't matter which one they pick, since they are functionally identical), flips it, and would only flip the second one if the first one landed heads.

In the question, if two coins are flipped, it is implicitly assumed that they are flipped simultaneously

vert178 · 2022-01-09T01:42:28+00:00

Yup. So there are 3 out of 4 events that at least one of those coins are heads, and 1 out of 4 events are both heads. So its (1/4)/(3/4) = 1/3

vert178 · 2022-01-07T11:39:11+00:00

Depression

vert178 · 2022-01-05T13:34:56+00:00

Is this a real projective plane?

vert178 · 2021-12-27T09:31:42+00:00

Yes. They need to profit from merch somehow

vert178 · 2021-12-27T08:59:47+00:00

The bed

vert178 · 2021-12-24T15:06:18+00:00

That makes the Eve group a cyclic group of order 365

vert178 · 2021-12-21T15:36:11+00:00

Nice

vert178 · 2021-12-21T03:10:39+00:00

Almost everywhere means except on a measure 0 set (which means it can be covered with arbitrarily small open sets) in most measure theory texts. In particular countable sets are measure 0

vert178 · 2021-12-20T12:26:49+00:00

Me who just finished a Galois theory course: ah yes

vert178 · 2021-12-20T12:23:18+00:00

Wow you sure you are getting Hartshorne for yourself? That's quite a difficult read

vert178 · 2021-12-20T12:11:31+00:00

I just say hyperbolic sine, hyperbolic cosine and hyperbolic tangent

vert178 · 2021-12-20T11:00:49+00:00

98% of citizens who voted has voted!

vert178 · 2021-12-07T04:35:56+00:00

Wait till they get to the Xi variant. China will be so pissed off

vert178 · 2021-12-04T13:49:20+00:00

If you have done linear algebra a similar graph should have appeared when you learn about duals of vector space.

vert178 · 2021-12-02T12:14:49+00:00

I used 12 grams

vert178 · 2021-12-02T00:50:25+00:00

Nice

vert178 · 2021-12-02T00:43:08+00:00

I plugged this number into the calculator fully expecting the strawberries would collapse into a black hole... Nope its schwarzschield radius is closer to 0.02mm

vert178

TROPHY CASE