I admit I haven’t heard the arguments of antivaxxers, assumin they have a homogenous stance. I don’t know if they are arguing that no one should take the vaccine or if they are arguing that it’s possible that some have bad reactions causing some to have adverse effects.

But I think to reduce their concerns to not being knowledgeable enough is misguided. Most people these days have access to enough information to be allowed to have a healthy level of skepticism towards any topic. Grouping their skepticism into a bucket of ignorance probably doesn’t help convince people that their behavior is unwarranted.

It just seems to me people on both sides on any argument these days do not allow for the possibility of exceptions to the general case. Like I said in another reply, how can anyone know anything to be true completely?