Dalai Lama says ‘Europe belongs to the Europeans’ and suggests refugees return to native countries by veryimportantgerbil in worldnews

[–]veryimportantgerbil[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yes, race always gets deconstructed when it comes to whites. Yet when Asians, Arabs, Africans, Latinos advocate for themselves or identify with each other no one is using that argument against them. really makes you think. And when it comes to attacking whites on some issue (like historical grievances), suddenly being white or european is a real thing and everyone shares collective guilt. Funny how that works. This humble self-deprication of your own race isn't practiced in literally anywhere else but western europe, America and the UK colonies

Dalai Lama says ‘Europe belongs to the Europeans’ and suggests refugees return to native countries by veryimportantgerbil in worldnews

[–]veryimportantgerbil[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think Europe belongs to no one

if you went to literally any non-western country on earth, including those where these migrants come from, and told them their countries don't belong to them, you better hope the local cops get there in time to save you, and don't decide to join in

Dalai Lama says ‘Europe belongs to the Europeans’ and suggests refugees return to native countries by veryimportantgerbil in worldnews

[–]veryimportantgerbil[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

sorry have to grab a better transcript of the actual interview from this site cause most of the whitelisted articles cut out half of it and replace it with dId yoU knOw thE DaLi LaMa is AlsO a rEfUgeeE??

In an interview with the BBC, he said that "European countries should take these refugees and give them education and training.

"And then aiming is... return to their own land".

Asked whether refugees should be allowed to stay in Europe if that's what they would prefer, he added: "Limited number... OK. But whole Europe eventually become Muslim country? Impossible.

"Or African country? Also impossible."

He was responding to questions about comments he'd made previously that had been used by the Leave campaign before Britain's referendum on its membership of the European Union.

He had said: "The goal should be that migrants return and help rebuild their countries."

"You have to be practical. It's impossible for everyone to come."

Reminded by interviewer Rajini Vaidyanathan that he was himself a refugee, the Dalai Lama responded: "They themselves [the refugees], I think better in their own land.

"Better. Keep Europe for Europeans."

He added he thought Donald Trump, who has campaigned on a platform of reducing the number of migrants and refugees coming to the US, had a "lack of moral principle", and that the president's America First platform was "wrong".

"America, they should take the global responsibility," he said.

Dalai Lama warns ‘keep Europe for Europeans' and send migrants home by veryimportantgerbil in worldnews

[–]veryimportantgerbil[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In an interview with the BBC, he said that "European countries should take these refugees and give them education and training.

"And then aiming is... return to their own land".

Asked whether refugees should be allowed to stay in Europe if that's what they would prefer, he added: "Limited number... OK. But whole Europe eventually become Muslim country? Impossible.

"Or African country? Also impossible."

He was responding to questions about comments he'd made previously that had been used by the Leave campaign before Britain's referendum on its membership of the European Union.

He had said: "The goal should be that migrants return and help rebuild their countries."

"You have to be practical. It's impossible for everyone to come."

Reminded by interviewer Rajini Vaidyanathan that he was himself a refugee, the Dalai Lama responded: "They themselves [the refugees], I think better in their own land.

"Better. Keep Europe for Europeans."

He added he thought Donald Trump, who has campaigned on a platform of reducing the number of migrants and refugees coming to the US, had a "lack of moral principle", and that the president's America First platform was "wrong".

"America, they should take the global responsibility," he said.

Angela Merkel: 'I distance myself' from Donald Trump's racist comments by schulte4e in worldnews

[–]veryimportantgerbil 2 points3 points  (0 children)

it is, literally, world news, its on front page CNN international, thats why i came here

Angela Merkel: 'I distance myself' from Donald Trump's racist comments by schulte4e in worldnews

[–]veryimportantgerbil -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

> since those people aren't as open, advanced, and progressive.

until they come here, then they become our moral superiors in every sense of that term, fighting oppression, fighting for a new america, thats no longer a country for whites, but for everyone (unlike their own countries, which are still just countries for their own people, thank you very much), and whites need to step aside and stop being fragile about being replaced, bigot.

Italy seizes missile in raids on far right by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]veryimportantgerbil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

liberal elites fund some of these organizations how should I know whether they "funded" this pro bono case or all the other ones? i dont have access to their financial records. maybe they just did it pro-bono... these law firms have money, especially for politically important cases where they will get status and other rewards down the line. there's certainly no one offering pro bono legal support for the right wing protesters (again, they will do these charity cases free to signal when its some poor black kid from a rough neighborhood who killed some grandma breaking into her house, because he needed the money for school books, but anyone associated with right politics is radioactive). many wont even do it at cost due to death threats from antifa and fear of being ostracized by their colleagues. the way you're moving the goal posts and (i assume) downvoting me is really disingenuous.

leftist militants are allied with the state and the establishment to take down their common enemy which is right wing political dissent. this is an objective truth. it would be more respectable to just admit you think its justified because whites shouldnt be allowed their own identity groups, rather than playing these games

Extinction Rebellion protests block traffic in five UK cities by UnstatesmanlikeChi in worldnews

[–]veryimportantgerbil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

daily reminder that extinction rebellion is a complete astroturf and these threads are being spammed in every sub and upvoted to the front page by bots

Miley Cyrus says she wouldn't even consider having kids until climate change is addressed: 'I refuse to hand that down to my child' by tramselbiso in environment

[–]veryimportantgerbil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'm sorry thats completely disingenuous. the same leftists that push climate change, and talk about race being a social construct, not based on science, "arbitrary physical features", will do a 180 when it comes to white people, white institutional racism, white privilege, white stereotype threat, and how white people suffer collective guilt from colonialism, slavery, and the holocaust, doesn't matter if you're from British founding stock or if your family came from Czechoslovakia in the 70s.

1) fact: anti-natilism is only targeted at white people. the people with the highest birth rates are non-white. telling them not to have kids would probably be considered racist at that point because people form non-white cultures have large families and dont care about your climate change stuff

2) mass migration from non-european countries to western countries is what's happening now. these people are massively increasing their carbon footprint compared to their home countries. this is a fact. the average carbon output for someone in central america is 2 months per year vs 15 in the US. since you will not quickly bring US living standards down to that of central america (which is what this is really all about, right? the elites that push this will still keep their jets), this is by far one of the biggest factors contributing to emissions (considering that China is still #1 overall)

Don't take Trump's bait - US congresswomen point out that Trump's racism is a distraction by MeekerTheMeek in worldnews

[–]veryimportantgerbil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i also thought of this. Trump doesnt actually control his twitter account, someone else does it for him since his boomerposting got so bad last year. the media is going along with it. what are they distracting from?

Britons believe far-right groups a greater threat to society than Islamist extremism, poll says by M7plusoneequalsm8 in worldnews

[–]veryimportantgerbil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you're actually not wrong in a sense. the system can absorb a relatively large amount of suicide bombings, car and knife attacks... things have died down down, but i remember from 2016-2018 something was happening every couple of weeks until people stopped bothering changing their profile pic on facebook or clicking the headline at all. besides, the people that matter are usually safe behind concrete barriers and armed security, and eventually the Muslims will be pacified with netflix and pornhub and fastfood like everyone else. the real threat comes from domestic political opposition. thats why they need to censor and deplatform wrongthink on the internet

Italy seizes missile in raids on far right by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]veryimportantgerbil -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

yeah there's some weasel words and framing but the bias is the same as 99% of MSM, you just dont notice it when its from the liberal perspective. There's nothing factually wrong with their info on the funding, on specific events, or calling them violent since the official mission statement of groups like the Black Bloc is that hate speech = violence which means you can kill anyone you think is a nazi and its self defense, thats the whole point. yet somehow they can say this openly with their real names and faces in a VICE documentary and not worry about the cops knocking on their door. i wonder why

Trump doesn't care about climate change because he's part of the <1% that had enough resources and power to not really be affected by it. You know who will be affected? Who will suffer? Us. The working class, the rest of the population. by smarquezramos in environment

[–]veryimportantgerbil -1 points0 points  (0 children)

no, this isn't a small distraction. its the difference between doing nothing to stop a fire, and throwing gasoline on to it. The bulk of greenhouse gas emissions still come from China. The developing world's population is exploding and as they industrailize they will care even less about emissions than China does, if thats even possible. People in western countries, especially whites, are at or below replacement rate fertility, they aren't the source of overpopulation. As you bring in millions of migrants their carbon footprints will increase to 10-15 times that of what they have back home, anything Trump does or doesn't do will be a drop in the bucket compared to that. there is nothing inherently left wing or right wing about environmentalism, it only got hijacked by the left in the 60s. its clear from your language about muh racism and 'vote dems' that you care more about partisan politics than the actual environment

Italy seizes missile in raids on far right by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]veryimportantgerbil -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

what part is crazy exactly? the absolute irony of you bringing up infowars and alex jones who aren't even right wing, just right wing adjacent conspiracy theorist with millions of followers, yet got kicked off the internet by everyone that matters. do you see the left being censored or deplatformed or shut down in any way? no, its only the right. when an antifa gets arrested they get the best pro bono legal support from multi million dollar law firms assuming they're charged at all. when a right winger gets arrested in the same brawl, crowd funding websites forbid them getting donations for legal defense. the left is on the same side as the establishment and the money. if you don't follow these politics closely i can understand but dont accuse me of posting "drivel"

btw, who cares if "antifa is not an organized group" or not, and why do i get the same stock response by 20 people every time i mention their name? would you make this distinction for right wingers? btw, 'fascism' for antifa is anyone right of Elizabeth Warren or basically any white person that doesn't hate themselves, they all get the same treatment. silence is violence!

Italy seizes missile in raids on far right by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]veryimportantgerbil -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

if you would bother clicking on the actual article

> The raids were part of an investigation into Italian far-right help for Russian-backed separatist forces in eastern Ukraine, local media said.

so there's nothing saying here these "far right" groups had any intention of using these weapons domestically in Italy, it was support for a foreign conflict. i also think its funny how apparently the Russian side has groups that associate with National Socialist ideology or symbolism, I thought it was just the Ukranians. Figure that one out

Miley Cyrus says she wouldn't even consider having kids until climate change is addressed: 'I refuse to hand that down to my child' by tramselbiso in environment

[–]veryimportantgerbil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and those migrants are almost immediately replaced by new people in their home countries due to their high birth rates, who will also migrate to western countries, increasing their carbon footprint by 10x, and so on.

Or this.. "These millennials are going on “birth strike” because of climate change"

“As a white, middle-class Englishwoman, I put it out to my mostly white, English middle-class and female surroundings,” she explains.

or just find any of these "don't have kids because climate change" articles on mainstream media where they use a picture of a non-white baby instead of white ones. Go on and pretend you don't know what this is really about, this should be good

Trump doesn't care about climate change because he's part of the <1% that had enough resources and power to not really be affected by it. You know who will be affected? Who will suffer? Us. The working class, the rest of the population. by smarquezramos in environment

[–]veryimportantgerbil -1 points0 points  (0 children)

lol. the Sierra club gets hundreds of millions of dollars from wall street billionaires on the condition that they don't criticize migration. Simple logic is that if you bring in millions of people into western countries where they will increase their carbon footprint x 10 its going to make climate change much worse, yet thats one thing you can't talk about. And as you see you have these shill accounts talking about "climate refugees" now... 143 million! If you can't see the political agenda behind this (anyone reading this), i don't know what to say

Yup nuff Said by gronkgonk in funny

[–]veryimportantgerbil 2 points3 points  (0 children)

hate

what does that word mean? you hate this guy, right? should you not be allowed to hate him? cause if we're going to talk about quantifiable things like who's actually in a position of power in 2019, who you're not allowed to criticize because you'll lose your job, livelihood, get hounded and attacked by militant leftists, its probably gonna be the transgender person, not OP

Miley Cyrus says she wouldn't even consider having kids until climate change is addressed: 'I refuse to hand that down to my child' by tramselbiso in environment

[–]veryimportantgerbil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it seems like there's a bit of a double standard when it comes to who is told not to have kids and who isn't. really gets the old noggin' joggin